General Discussion

LWolf

(46,179 posts)

48. But...But...

Sun Nov 23, 2014, 12:24 PM

Nov 2014

any candidate who actually stands for something, who actually stands a line and fights to move it for us, who actually represents us...that candidate can't WIN!!!!

We can't WIN unless we support someone who doesn't represent us! We MUST get behind the nothing-candidate, or we'll LOSE. Don't you get it?

WE CAN ONLY WIN IF WE LOSE.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

THE NOTHING CANDIDATE: Same Mistakes As '08 [View all] Segami Nov 2014 OP

Unrec. One day soon, HRC will announce she is running for President*. At FSogol Nov 2014 #1

She got more votes than Obama in the primary. joshcryer Nov 2014 #17

Re-rec. Raul Hernandez Nov 2014 #51

I'm sorry, but I'm developing Clinton fatique.. OLDMADAM Nov 2014 #62

I have shared the folowing link several times but will gladly share again. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #2

ok, thx . . . I see she's expressed no position, snot Nov 2014 #6

Excellent post. woo me with science Nov 2014 #13

She voted against telecom immunity. joshcryer Nov 2014 #14

The NSA "...might be the most impt. issue..." randome Nov 2014 #29

Did you go to the link? Information on FISA was there. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #36

gee maybe she is just minding her own biz and letting people actually in charge do their jobs? nt msongs Nov 2014 #3

Hmm,.. Segami Nov 2014 #4

Unfortunaty, Hillary Clinton is NOT a "nothing candidate". NancyDL Nov 2014 #5

Bullshit. RBInMaine Nov 2014 #20

So agree. We need a TRUE progressive. No more Third Way fake dems!!! ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #30

She's much worse than a "nothing" candidate. She stands for the Third Way corporate agenda woo me with science Nov 2014 #34

Thanks for the references, proof positive of why I support Hillary Clinton. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #38

War is Peace! woo me with science Nov 2014 #40

I have heard this propaganda before, it has not changed my mind in the past and don't think Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #45

it's not even propaganda Raul Hernandez Nov 2014 #52

Here is a clue Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #57

Well, bless your heart. nt truebluegreen Nov 2014 #42

Thank you. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #44

I become more unimpressed with her daily...n/t monmouth4 Nov 2014 #7

+1000000 TO THE GREATEST PAGE. Note that our resident Third Way message control crew woo me with science Nov 2014 #8

Can I go around in circles. aspirant Nov 2014 #28

excellent article. thanks for posting it. cali Nov 2014 #9

This is a very important thread. This is the mockery that has been made of our democratic process woo me with science Nov 2014 #10

Nothing matters but wresting our government back from corporations - Excellent post ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #19

I hope Hillary Clinton will be the president in two years, BreakfastClub Nov 2014 #11

Although Hillary is largely liberal on social issues (though usually not ahead of the curve) cali Nov 2014 #12

Yeah, no. Social issues are economic issues. joshcryer Nov 2014 #16

Actually, economic issues are social issues. woo me with science Nov 2014 #23

Wrong, economic populists historically shove social issues under the bus. joshcryer Nov 2014 #26

to a degree. and the reverse is also true. cali Nov 2014 #25

Yeah? Name one vote. joshcryer Nov 2014 #27

Don't allow the TeaLeft fringe to discourage you. Read on: RBInMaine Nov 2014 #21

You seem worried. Just sayin~ nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #32

wrong. I have long been opposed to Hillary for President. I certainly didn't support Nader cali Nov 2014 #33

The DLC/Third Way Kermitt Gribble Nov 2014 #60

She hasn't declared. joshcryer Nov 2014 #15

OP-"everyone in the party seems to be supporting her, & yet nobody can articulate exactly why." RiverLover Nov 2014 #18

& TWO victories, and 22,000,000 new jobs, Clinton would have been elected to a 3rd term. RBInMaine Nov 2014 #22

3rd term? Clinton would still be President. joshcryer Nov 2014 #31

Clinton had a lot to do with the suffering of the Iraqi people. Why is this ignored? LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #53

No. But Clinton was the worst. GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #35

Excellent post. woo me with science Nov 2014 #24

Nothing would be an improvement. 99Forever Nov 2014 #37

Wanna bet? Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #39

I'll bet you. Hillary could never win a general election for president. RiverLover Nov 2014 #41

Yep, gotta work to own everything, very hard. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #46

+10000000000 woo me with science Nov 2014 #43

What we do not need from either the left or right is going too far in either direction. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #47

But...But... LWolf Nov 2014 #48

LOL +1!!!!!!!!! ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #49

... woo me with science Nov 2014 #67

If you like platitudes with your status quo, JEB Nov 2014 #50

If you like the Fill in the Blank candidate, Hillary is it. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #54

Sometimes I think she likes the "inevitable" talk. kentuck Nov 2014 #55

her rousing tag line: MY TURN MINE MINE MINE elehhhhna Nov 2014 #59

She's a something candidate alright. And those somethings all have names LittleBlue Nov 2014 #56

'The Ready for Hillary event was like a “Star Trek” convention where Captain Kirk never shows up.' LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #58

kick for corruption woo me with science Nov 2014 #61

I love your posts but unrec on calling her a nothing candidate. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #63

No, she's absolutely not nothing. woo me with science Nov 2014 #65

I'd be she'll try to remain completely quite on the Keystone deal davidpdx Nov 2014 #64

Her silence on Keystone just exposes her woo me with science Nov 2014 #66

kick woo me with science Nov 2014 #68