Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
6. No, that's not really it.
Sun Dec 7, 2014, 04:50 AM
Dec 2014

There was a big rumpus a few years ago when insurance companies wanted to discharge women and infants as soon as the baby came out, people calling it "drive by deliveries." A lot of the babies boomeranged back within a day with complications. Now they keep them for at least 24 hours.

Refusing to undergo a tox screen (against the fifth amendment) and going AMA are both red flags and the phone calls to CPS are mandatory. Unfortunately it activated a martinet who just snatched the kid without asking the right questions and certainly without bothering to assess the real situation along with the baby's condition.

When vague questions like these arise about newborns and their families, civilized countries send trained people to check on them periodically to make sure the baby is gaining weight and the mother is healing well. We'd rather just criminalize mothers for being poor and snatch their kids in this country.

It's just another example of how this has turned into a hell for a lot of working people.

I hope this mom sues, but CPS is nearly as unaccountable as the cops are.

Richard A. Ramhoff I call BS Kalidurga Dec 2014 #1
That's the way I interpreted it. Renew Deal Dec 2014 #9
that will teach women to leave early! Liberal_in_LA Dec 2014 #15
They wanted to pad the bill Man from Pickens Dec 2014 #2
It's unbelievable they took her baby away. madfloridian Dec 2014 #4
it's very believable Man from Pickens Dec 2014 #5
No, that's not really it. Warpy Dec 2014 #6
Very Orwellian. pacalo Dec 2014 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #7
That was my first thought. madfloridian Dec 2014 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #16
They claimed she was "hostile"? Jesus H. Christ! countryjake Dec 2014 #8
Agree. Seems more like child abuse than child protection. madfloridian Dec 2014 #11
Slouching toward the police state. n/t Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #12
Count me among the disgusted Savannahmann Dec 2014 #13
K&R me b zola Dec 2014 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happened to this Mom...»Reply #6