Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
2. So the states try to enforce new rules & Big Coal takes it to the pro-corporate USSC
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 09:55 PM
Dec 2014

Am I missing something here? How the HELL can the EPA say this is a step forward? By stating arsenic and lead are non-hazardous wastes, it is leaving an open invitation to Big Coal to challenge any state claiming otherwise. Further, since coal ash travels across state lines via wind and water, it obviously creates interstate situations requiring federal regulatory oversight and enforcement.

More from the link:

The agency first proposed rules governing coal ash storage in 2010, in the wake of a massive spill at a ruptured holding pond in Tennessee that has cost more than $1 billion to clean up.

Environmental groups expressed disappointment with the long-anticipated rules, saying they did not go far enough in protecting the environment and human health in areas where coal ash is stored.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Coal Ash Is Not Hazardous...»Reply #2