General Discussion

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)

150. A lot is to question and is our right to do so.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #145)

Sun Dec 21, 2014, 02:00 PM

Dec 2014

I am asking you again, what did I or the OP out had to do with WTC ???

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

370 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do we actually know who killed those cops [View all] malaise Dec 2014 OP

why don't you just say who you think did it? n/t ProdigalJunkMail Dec 2014 #1

This dude was wanted in Baltimore for shooting a woman. Raine1967 Dec 2014 #2

agreed. KMOD Dec 2014 #3

Why did he have to assassinate 2 policemen to die? elias49 Dec 2014 #7

He was making a point. philosslayer Dec 2014 #8

I can't get into the mind of a dead murderer. Raine1967 Dec 2014 #38

Maybe someone put the idea in his head? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #55

OH MY GOOD GOD NuclearDem Dec 2014 #57

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #59

Sorry, maybe I'm tired, but I'm not following you. Michael Brown is not really the issue sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #66

This malaise Dec 2014 #78

I'm only 50% with your conclusion, but ALL your questions are good and logical. And this IS the... marble falls Dec 2014 #366

Don't mind him, he is back on the naughty stool. Rex Dec 2014 #224

you are correct, ignore that, and let the tinfoil flow! snooper2 Dec 2014 #340

Awww...did one of your buddies get a time out and now your gots a madz? Rex Dec 2014 #345

Who is that? Oh, I'm never mad- snooper2 Dec 2014 #351

Why am I not surprised? So you support the police shootings of innocent sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #63

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #64

+1 Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #81

Gotta say... Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #91

You aprove of NuclearDem's nastiness? darkangel218 Dec 2014 #99

That's what I said. Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #103

Not surprised at all with your stance. nt. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #106

Don't care. nt Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #115

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #116

Wait, you left something out. Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #119

Who or what are you "clapping your hands" for? darkangel218 Dec 2014 #120

I hate the censorship here Boreal Dec 2014 #220

I agree, though I do like the system we have now as opposed to sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #234

Really? Boreal Dec 2014 #255

Sorry about that, it happens occasionally, but overall I prefer the jury system sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #274

Its not censorship of ideas, its censorship of intent. Last night there was a concerted effort to... marble falls Dec 2014 #367

The poster who made that vile comment was lying. The post sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #238

Why am I not surprised? So you support the shooting of zappaman Dec 2014 #246

well thank you G_j Dec 2014 #162

Sorry Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #185

That definately was the sewer grate. marble falls Dec 2014 #370

Gotta agree, GGJohn Dec 2014 #105

Why are you clapping? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #108

No she didn't. Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #212

Not too clear, but it's not worth clarifying. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #214

Yes but not a shock coming from that poster. zappaman Dec 2014 #217

Which poster? The hidden post? If so, I agree. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #236

+1...nt SidDithers Dec 2014 #125

Yup. zappaman Dec 2014 #168

I AGREE Skittles Dec 2014 #216

Maybe personally you might, but what was proven with a post almost nobody saw and..... marble falls Dec 2014 #368

Its called freedom of expression and freedom of thought.. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #98

It amazes me how if you question a situation Tsiyu Dec 2014 #102

+1000 darkangel218 Dec 2014 #111

Wrong Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #118

You backed ND and his hidden post darkangel218 Dec 2014 #121

That comment was NOT directed Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #122

You backed NuclearDem who cursed the OP, malaise. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #123

You're talking in circles now Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #126

No I am not. Im poiting out what you did ( you admitted of backing NuclearDem when i asked you darkangel218 Dec 2014 #130

You need to re-read the comments, GGJohn Dec 2014 #128

Sabrina supported the OP darkangel218 Dec 2014 #132

So? GGJohn Dec 2014 #134

NuclearDem violated the TOS and community standards and got his posts hidden darkangel218 Dec 2014 #137

No, I do not. GGJohn Dec 2014 #139

Really?? darkangel218 Dec 2014 #140

Yes, really. GGJohn Dec 2014 #141

Fine. And in case you delete: darkangel218 Dec 2014 #143

Why would I delete? GGJohn Dec 2014 #146

Correct. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #147

Different strokes for different folks. GGJohn Dec 2014 #149

amazing...you support abuse of another poster Tsiyu Dec 2014 #155

I said I wanted to be treated with kids gloves? GGJohn Dec 2014 #157

Aren't you just awesome Tsiyu Dec 2014 #164

Boy, did you ever read that wrong!!!! GGJohn Dec 2014 #170

while supporting someone who was far from decent? Uhuh.... Tsiyu Dec 2014 #174

Happy Holidays. GGJohn Dec 2014 #189

If I can get the smell out of this room Tsiyu Dec 2014 #191

Now you're doing the same thing you accused me of? GGJohn Dec 2014 #194

So you don't like it when people online are mean? Tsiyu Dec 2014 #196

I could care less if your mean to me, GGJohn Dec 2014 #199

Who are "you guys"? zappaman Dec 2014 #204

Not everybody at DU has the ideology we would expect at DU... NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #241

Welcome to DU! zappaman Dec 2014 #249

So we all have to walk in lockstep around here? GGJohn Dec 2014 #271

You're absolutely right. But the majority of DUers still do. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #289

There are so many plants around here it would take a lake to water them all NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #347

lol rbrnmw Dec 2014 #362

Why anyone takes the usual suspect serously is a mystery to me. Rex Dec 2014 #230

You're right, old timers are not fooled at all. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #295

Well questioning absolutely nothing makes a person stick out like a sorethumb. Rex Dec 2014 #333

I have a thick skin too and I didn't spend any time in the army. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #285

Ha, you want to see a forum with no rules? GGJohn Dec 2014 #290

I like Discussionist. And I've never seen a post filled with the kind of vitriol sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #291

She has it right. The OP was being attacked by someone who has sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #275

No she wasn't. zappaman Dec 2014 #280

This is not a question. zappaman Dec 2014 #175

Do you repeat yourself often? But no, it was an observation. Tsiyu Dec 2014 #182

An observation? zappaman Dec 2014 #184

You poor dear Tsiyu Dec 2014 #188

I'm fine thanks. zappaman Dec 2014 #200

no there isn't Skittles Dec 2014 #287

+1000 darkangel218 Dec 2014 #97

"Who is orchestrating this campaign to try to shut down these protests? " J_J_ Dec 2014 #353

Why were 4 Lakewood Police murdered in a Coffee shop? rustydog Dec 2014 #360

fuck outta here with your loony bullshit name not needed Dec 2014 #4

It's not loony to question what we're told. Fawke Em Dec 2014 #41

"we don't have a press corps who questions anything authorities tell them" Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2014 #50

+1000 All this vitriol toward the OP for even *suggesting* that we question woo me with science Dec 2014 #69

+1000 darkangel218 Dec 2014 #124

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! malaise Dec 2014 #136

AMEN x 1,0000000000000000 n/t Tsiyu Dec 2014 #156

+1 million CatWoman Dec 2014 #159

Amen... MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #160

+100000000..... G_j Dec 2014 #172

This is not a question zappaman Dec 2014 #177

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2014 #203

It is always the same small group of self-righteous authoritarians Rex Dec 2014 #232

Good post AuntPatsy Dec 2014 #277

+10,000 n/t sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #296

This is not a question zappaman Dec 2014 #176

OK - so it's a hypothesis. Fawke Em Dec 2014 #284

It looks like they were shot by aliens with some sort of otherworldly weapon. zappaman Dec 2014 #297

What was loony about what malaise said? NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #101

I'll answer that…. NOTHING MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #158

You know I spent an hour looking into the eyes of that little boy who was wrongly executed malaise Dec 2014 #165

Lol. zappaman Dec 2014 #171

Excellent post, thank you. It sure gets some people very upset when people who sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #299

Lol. zappaman Dec 2014 #303

This... zappaman Dec 2014 #178

Here's some more from HuffPost LiberalElite Dec 2014 #5

Hmmm... philosslayer Dec 2014 #6

It's Marco Rubio sharp_stick Dec 2014 #10

sarcasm is the least efficient form of communication GreatGazoo Dec 2014 #82

Yes, because Jon Stewart has been such an abject failure. OilemFirchen Dec 2014 #215

Heh. You forgot the Zionists! And the Freemasons! nt branford Dec 2014 #222

And, for God's sake, don't forget COLGATE4 Dec 2014 #279

Did you know that the NYPD, and other so-called 'civilian PDs' send some of their sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #300

Link? zappaman Dec 2014 #305

Try not to overthink it sharp_stick Dec 2014 #9

Gonna? philosslayer Dec 2014 #12

Add "kind of"? Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #72

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #131

I am surprised it took you this long AnalystInParadise Dec 2014 #11

Huh? n/t malaise Dec 2014 #14

What he means is, take this shit to "InfoWars" 7962 Dec 2014 #42

He can't answer, he's been given a vacation ... so I guess his snide suggestion sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #301

How is info wars these days? zappaman Dec 2014 #306

I'm sorry for ignoring you, it wasn't intentional, just too many other sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #314

For starters, you could point out where Nuclear Dem said... zappaman Dec 2014 #316

I thought you were asking about another web site? Which one was it? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #318

No, but you can answer the question. zappaman Dec 2014 #319

Like I said, and seriously, not trying to hurt your feelings again, fishing isn't your sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #323

So, you put words into his mouth. zappaman Dec 2014 #325

Are you having a bad night? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #332

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #343

Do you have any interest in political issues at all? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #348

Still cheering the deaths of these police officers? zappaman Dec 2014 #349

Not interested in political issues at all, then? That's what I assumed sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #350

Enjoy your happiness over the deaths of two police officers. zappaman Dec 2014 #352

Was this necessary? ScreamingMeemie Dec 2014 #45

Yes AnalystInParadise Dec 2014 #52

No, sir, you weren't. As witty as you think you might be with your response, it's ScreamingMeemie Dec 2014 #65

He/she got a break from DU, just not by choice. Rex Dec 2014 #233

Yes, a well deserved break! sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #302

Is it really so extreme? ncjustice80 Dec 2014 #75

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #169

Seriously? cwydro Dec 2014 #13

Wow I have been gone a long time Horse with no Name Dec 2014 #15

and showing themselves what they truly are CatWoman Dec 2014 #16

That's a bit more than pintobean Dec 2014 #19

I remember when I didn't believe the rumors that the US was torturing people sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #304

"Back then"? zappaman Dec 2014 #308

Did I ever tell you, I hope it doesn't hurt your feelings, but fishing is not your thing! sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #321

Dodging again. zappaman Dec 2014 #324

I have to wonder how the question should provoke rage. Completely unexpected. Judi Lynn Dec 2014 #29

yup CatWoman Dec 2014 #40

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #54

Yeah sounds just like the spoiled rotten police union leaders Rex Dec 2014 #235

Certainly not just a question. 840high Dec 2014 #43

It goes like this. Igel Dec 2014 #90

Actually, the OP was pretty up front about the reason why the question is being asked. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #312

This is not a question zappaman Dec 2014 #180

Deservedly so. cwydro Dec 2014 #18

Yeah like we haven't ever used patsies Horse with no Name Dec 2014 #20

Reading is a skill. cwydro Dec 2014 #24

You mean like -- Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #74

It doesn't take long before they show who they are. Spontaneous, unthinking explosions. Judi Lynn Dec 2014 #22

You'll have to explain philosslayer Dec 2014 #23

+1 pintobean Dec 2014 #27

Accept everything they say malaise Dec 2014 #28

So "they" intend to silence the protesters. philosslayer Dec 2014 #31

Do you know who posted on Instagram? malaise Dec 2014 #33

Not sure what happened here, but you can be sure that even if it is what it appears to NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #243

That's the official meme malaise Dec 2014 #259

They NYPD has murdered innocent unarmed civilians. And they got away with it. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #334

That's great. "Water on a duck's back." nilesobek Dec 2014 #32

"never question anything." Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #73

That^^^ onecaliberal Dec 2014 #129

Yeah right. zappaman Dec 2014 #183

Yes you have... SomethingFishy Dec 2014 #211

the guy was just a garden-variety gun-humping nutcase Skittles Dec 2014 #17

Got that right. n/t Horse with no Name Dec 2014 #25

Exactly. nt cwydro Dec 2014 #26

True but give thanks for Mediaite malaise Dec 2014 #30

he posted stuff on his girlfriend's instagram account KMOD Dec 2014 #34

You are making a fool of yourself here. cwydro Dec 2014 #36

WTF? zappaman Dec 2014 #51

Seconded. linuxman Dec 2014 #71

+1000. eom GGJohn Dec 2014 #272

Oh fer fucks sake. zappaman Dec 2014 #21

This guy? Go Vols Dec 2014 #35

da fauq?!? *sigh* n/t X_Digger Dec 2014 #37

In the words of the late great Marvin Gaye (out of context): KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #39

I saw a comment on FB that it's weird that when cops get killed it's always the good ones not DesertDiamond Dec 2014 #44

Al Qaeda did it. Quantess Dec 2014 #46

I'm skeptical also. 99Forever Dec 2014 #47

I dont know what exactly happened darkangel218 Dec 2014 #95

k&r.... spanone Dec 2014 #48

I knew somebody would peddle this kind of shit here. Throd Dec 2014 #49

I blame chemtrails. Dr. Strange Dec 2014 #357

Double facehoof. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #53

... GGJohn Dec 2014 #56

Read this.. 840high Dec 2014 #58

Utterly senseless. liberalmuse Dec 2014 #60

...^ that 840high Dec 2014 #62

Not sure how it makes them worse but I agree it is all bad. nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #83

Turns out the shooter had a history of serious mental issues. liberalmuse Dec 2014 #237

America is home to over 300,000,000 people. You're gonna find a few nuts in there. Drunken Irishman Dec 2014 #61

Lone crazed gunman nichomachus Dec 2014 #67

Hmm.....I don't KNooow.... maced666 Dec 2014 #68

and the NYPD is using it politically. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #70

the illuminati??? ileus Dec 2014 #76

Ismaaiyl Brinsley JustAnotherGen Dec 2014 #77

K&R RandiFan1290 Dec 2014 #79

. Rex Dec 2014 #239

I know, right...I just love watching them go nuts...very entertaining. NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #244

I think you present a realistic question... FarPoint Dec 2014 #80

and that realistic question is... shaayecanaan Dec 2014 #84

I validate the discussion process. FarPoint Dec 2014 #87

Another realistic question. Has the NYPD ever murdered any of its citizens sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #337

Benghazi was behind it. Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #85

skepticism is to be expected UglyGreed Dec 2014 #86

Exactly. nt darkangel218 Dec 2014 #114

A nutjob killed them, who was inspired by all the irresponsible rhetoric saying "all cops are bad" Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #88

But I haven't heard any protester at all try to foment war Tsiyu Dec 2014 #161

You did not hear the protesters chanting in NY last week "What do we want? Dead cops! When do kelly1mm Dec 2014 #205

Stochastic terrorism goes both ways, I guess... Brickbat Dec 2014 #89

Well, gawker has this... sibelian Dec 2014 #92

Who killed the police officers is an answered question mrdmk Dec 2014 #93

It's threads like this that make DU a laughing stock muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #94

Trying to shut people up is what "makes DU suck", not asking a question , or showing doubt. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #96

Igel expresses the reality of 'asking a question' in #90 muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #100

Niether you nor I were there or know the details of what caused this tragedy darkangel218 Dec 2014 #104

it's not about police reports; it's about the news reports, from eye-witnesses muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #109

News reports nor eye witnesses know what fueled/caused this. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #110

Because both are questioning large numbers of eye-witnesses muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #127

Do eyewitnesses know more beyond what they saw? darkangel218 Dec 2014 #135

That they saw someone shoot them from close range through the window muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #145

A lot is to question and is our right to do so. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #150

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #152

No one did that. Who are you quotting there?? darkangel218 Dec 2014 #153

They have nothing, so your confusion is warranted. Rex Dec 2014 #240

Well said malaise Dec 2014 #144

Rightwingers hate it when you ask questions...I know that from personal experience NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #248

That's very strange... MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #166

Do you think the Garner family is wondering if it wasn't Brinsley? If Al Sharpton thinks that? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #207

That shouldn't be the focus of what this is about at all.. MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #209

It's a little too pat for me, too Warpy Dec 2014 #107

That is exactly what the Sandy Hook truthers say melman Dec 2014 #112

Well, it's just a little bit different Warpy Dec 2014 #113

Shhhhhhhhhhhh malaise Dec 2014 #154

I see no reason to doubt the story as it's come to us, save for a the Marr Dec 2014 #117

Huh/NT DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2014 #133

Thanks for the kick. nt darkangel218 Dec 2014 #138

if law enforcement uses this one isolated incident to declare war on the citizens of NY, notadmblnd Dec 2014 #142

They weren't shot by a marksman. It was point blank. chrisa Dec 2014 #148

You werent there. darkangel218 Dec 2014 #151

The gunman was right up against the police car they were in. chrisa Dec 2014 #206

His GF isn't dead, he shot her in the stomach, GGJohn Dec 2014 #213

Yup, you're right - she isn't dead. Sorry chrisa Dec 2014 #228

oh they've got that covered, chrisa Skittles Dec 2014 #309

You called it. zappaman Dec 2014 #310

aw don't you know? Skittles Dec 2014 #311

Here on DU, we have experts in other countries... zappaman Dec 2014 #315

For those of you who don't believe wingzeroday Dec 2014 #163

I don't think anyone said anything about what they believe Tsiyu Dec 2014 #167

This is not a question. zappaman Dec 2014 #173

No, that was an observation Tsiyu Dec 2014 #179

Uh huh. zappaman Dec 2014 #181

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #186

No. zappaman Dec 2014 #187

Sandy Hook deniers are pigs Tsiyu Dec 2014 #190

But but zappaman Dec 2014 #197

ROFL malaise Dec 2014 #192

You jest better stop astin' all these hyere questions, Missy! Tsiyu Dec 2014 #193

I'd like Santa to continue to guarantee our right to malaise Dec 2014 #198

This is a question? zappaman Dec 2014 #201

I agree interesting how some reacted...... AuntPatsy Dec 2014 #278

Indeed wingzeroday Dec 2014 #208

Wouldn't surprise me if the NORKs were behind it. VScott Dec 2014 #210

In defense of malaise Matrosov Dec 2014 #195

Linking the shootings by a nutbag to the protests is wrong. grahamhgreen Dec 2014 #202

"they appear to have been shot by a marksman" zappaman Dec 2014 #218

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #219

The default setting of a critically thinking person Boreal Dec 2014 #221

But getting off the questioning train before it steams into Crackpot Junction is important. Throd Dec 2014 #223

"they appear to have been shot by a marksman" zappaman Dec 2014 #225

I didn't say that Boreal Dec 2014 #226

I find this particular question neither honest nor valid. Throd Dec 2014 #231

Show me an 'honest and valid question', and you might have a point. X_Digger Dec 2014 #252

Gladly Boreal Dec 2014 #256

Still waiting. I imagine I will be for a while, if that's what you consider a valid question. X_Digger Dec 2014 #260

He blew past Crackpot Junction, and careened full speed into Asylum Station. nt branford Dec 2014 #229

Do we have any evidence of the official story regarding this tragedy? If you have sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #242

what evidence do YOU have? Skittles Dec 2014 #281

Absolutely none. Which is why I asked the question. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #283

which is why you're speculating this was some kind of setup? Skittles Dec 2014 #286

The tragedy is being used by the NYPD to try to stop the protests against sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #293

yes, certain people are taking adavantage and it is vile Skittles Dec 2014 #307

Using the tragic deaths of their own, to try to silence people who have a legitmate sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #335

"As things appear right now, those cops were murdered by a lunatic." Skittles Dec 2014 #336

Blaming the Brooklyn deaths on the protesters is vile beyond belief. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #342

I'm glad to see the families of Mr. Brown and Mr. Garner rise above this crap Skittles Dec 2014 #354

I'm sorry to see such decent people have their dead loved ones so sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #355

done here Skittles Dec 2014 #358

I'm done here. You came here to lecture people who don't need sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #359

Well Thank God Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #363

Righteous!!...nt SidDithers Dec 2014 #364

Is there some reason why you are talking to me? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #365

I think there was a second shooter. branford Dec 2014 #227

Wow! You sure did make some 'liberals' upset with your OP! The foaming at the mouth Rex Dec 2014 #245

Since the OP refuses to tell us why this attack looks like it was done by "trained marksmen" zappaman Dec 2014 #247

Maybe he believes it, because the papers keep using "execution style" to hype the story? Rex Dec 2014 #250

So there is a script he strayed from? Throd Dec 2014 #251

Script? Who mentioned that? You never speculate about anything? Rex Dec 2014 #253

Actually Rex, here on DU conspiracy theories are, or WERE, not allowed in GD. KittyWampus Dec 2014 #341

Oh go cry me a river, seriously I guess you can't be bothered to use ignore thread. Rex Dec 2014 #346

Actually CTs are still not allowed in GD. The OP was not peddling any theory, she was sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #356

Golly, I guess we will never know every single answer zappaman Dec 2014 #257

You keep saying that and I am not saying it is not a question. Rex Dec 2014 #264

Free protip- there is no 'free speech' on DU. Not in a 1st amendment way. X_Digger Dec 2014 #254

Okay then, a freedom to express your opinion within TOS guidelines. Rex Dec 2014 #267

Thanks- folks muddy that concept way too much for me to pass it by. X_Digger Dec 2014 #269

Hmmm I will now refer to it as DU free speech Rex Dec 2014 #270

free speech is one thing Skittles Dec 2014 #288

Foaming at the mouth over speculation is really stupid. Rex Dec 2014 #317

some shit I see just makes me shake my head Skittles Dec 2014 #320

Yeah that is obvious by the replies in this thread. Rex Dec 2014 #322

It's a privately owned website. zappaman Dec 2014 #326

Hey don't be angry at me. Rex Dec 2014 #327

I'm not angry at you at all. zappaman Dec 2014 #329

Sorry, DU free speech. Rex Dec 2014 #331

Marksman? flvegan Dec 2014 #258

The same one that shot Dale Earnhardt. Throd Dec 2014 #261

Shot Dale Earnhardt? flvegan Dec 2014 #263

I figured while we're making up "marksman" theories... Throd Dec 2014 #266

Aha! flvegan Dec 2014 #268

What "we" believe seveneyes Dec 2014 #262

We don't know who shot them. You're not the only one asking this question. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #265

WHY do you say we don't know? Skittles Dec 2014 #273

You and I both, I had identical questions along with a huge red waving flag in front of my eyes... AuntPatsy Dec 2014 #276

Really? zappaman Dec 2014 #282

Head shots more often than not appear professional hit, an insurance if you will that death AuntPatsy Dec 2014 #292

Huh? zappaman Dec 2014 #298

How did he know he would kill TWO cops? (per his social media posts) hexola Dec 2014 #294

It's very neat malaise Dec 2014 #338

Still not answering the question I see. zappaman Dec 2014 #344

"they appear to have been shot by a marksman" zappaman Dec 2014 #313

they won't answer but will laugh that your "feathers got ruffled" Skittles Dec 2014 #328

Oh I know. zappaman Dec 2014 #330

Things that make you go hmmmmm/NT DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2014 #339

Interesting question but I think it happened as they said it did. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #361

Do we care? Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #369