General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You can't criticize one pseudoscience when supporting another. [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)You are merely parroting the usual anti-GMO cliches without bothering to actually look at the evidence available. That is disingenuous at best. I have noted that you have done the same thing repeatedly on this page.
And, yes, seed companies do make their seeds available to independent researchers.
http://grist.org/food/genetically-modified-seed-research-whats-locked-and-what-isnt/
Finally, there is no science-based justification for labeling a seed development technology. And, if you want to label seed development technologies, attempting to label only the one that anti-GMO marketers have worked to demonize without justification is simply bizarre. Why is it that organic companies don't label foods developed using mutation breeding, for example? And do you really think they would do it, if you asked them to do so?