Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)

1. yawn

Reply to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Original post)

Fri Mar 6, 2015, 10:19 AM

Mar 2015

Only a few lines in a 62-page report on the Ambassador's performance deals with email use. He was not let go just for that one violation. The report was generally described as one of the worst reviews of an ambassador’s performance written by the IG’s staff in several years.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So go google 'clinton email ambassador fired'... [View all] Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 OP

yawn wyldwolf Mar 2015 #1

As I have said to folks trying to play up the email scandal, by itself its simply not a big deal. stevenleser Mar 2015 #4

"not let go just for that one violation"? What violation? hughee99 Mar 2015 #10

Scott Gration was the ousted Ambassador.... Segami Mar 2015 #2

At least he had a .gov email address that he used for govt business RiverLover Mar 2015 #6

Thank you. I googled it. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #3

I understand your dilemna. I vaguely recall the incident you mentioned. razorman Mar 2015 #5

That issue is soooo 2naSalit Mar 2015 #7

You already blew it...your post refers to a right-wing source... joeybee12 Mar 2015 #8

Well, that's where I saw it first. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #9

I'm a skeptic...I don't believe anyone! joeybee12 Mar 2015 #11

Hah! Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #12

Hint: they all are right-wing shitholes PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #13