Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
1. Obviously 50 years ago there wasn't widely shared prosperity
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:29 AM
May 2015

Civil rights were barely a thing. Women hadn't entered the work force at the same level. Add more people to the work force though, and each individual person is needed less. It's the same with global labor issues. As the rest of the world opens up, Americans of every sex and color are needed less, as either producer or consumer. On top of that, if you add in advancing technological automation, humans in every part of the world are needed less.

As to the siphoning of profits for a small percentage, that's no different than what we humans are doing in relation to the rest of life on the planet. Civilization is a resource concentration mechanism. We privatize the wealth of the planet for our species, and socialize the costs of our actions to whatever life stands in the way of our progress. In those terms, human beings are the 1%.

We're not going to give up those advantages voluntarily, so it's not so hard to see why the other 1% won't either.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich: The wealthy...»Reply #1