Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
160. Reading through this thread again leaves me with one question.
Mon May 25, 2015, 12:49 PM
May 2015

I agree with many in this thread that the primary poses a bigger challenge for Bernie than the GE.

Since that's the case, why would Democrats who have a chance to nominate a winner who is better on every single issue than HRC, who have a chance to nominate someone who would actually work and fight to lead the country out of her neo-liberal degradation, nominate a neo-liberal instead?

Why wouldn't Democrats who align more closely with Sanders on issues not throw him their support?

The answer to that question is one I can't, while trying to honor the TOS, answer.

I remember when the conventional wisdom was that Bill Clinton stood no chance against Bush Sr. Nye Bevan May 2015 #1
Thank you... Paka May 2015 #7
Reminds me of 1972 1939 May 2015 #31
I don't have to talk to those in my circle. Paka May 2015 #35
Which still isn't a representative sample of the potential voting pool mythology May 2015 #63
This is not 1972 - we have been through 30+ years of trickle down. That will be remembered in jwirr May 2015 #109
In 1972 1939 May 2015 #140
Oh, I am well aware of the times and the results of the election since I worked in McGovern's jwirr May 2015 #150
I am also 74 and agree with you. Chipper Chat May 2015 #89
Polling has Bush/Clinton within 1 pt in Florida. brooklynite May 2015 #112
And neither one has started to campaign. 1939 May 2015 #143
The Presidential won't be dependent on the State Party... brooklynite May 2015 #147
Pennsylvania has gone Democratic the last six elections. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #149
I think that the tone in the USA is one that makes it possible for that grumpy old man to win. He is jwirr May 2015 #105
And 1939 May 2015 #146
People are putting those things on the internet. They (I) am the electorate. jwirr May 2015 #151
Yes, but 1939 May 2015 #166
And of course that is the question. jwirr May 2015 #171
Also helped that Perot got 19 million votes. NuclearDem May 2015 #48
Res ipsa loquitur DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #148
Racial Pepsi-Cola? Orrex May 2015 #182
Bill Clinton was one of the most saavy political figures in the last 50 years,,, brooklynite May 2015 #111
a lot of people really think he could win. his ideas *should* win, but the people who think he dionysus May 2015 #2
We did not ELECT GWB twice and even once (2004) is still contested. - nt KingCharlemagne May 2015 #56
It would appear we did. Agschmid May 2015 #65
You know what? You're 100% right. GWB received more votes nationally and in Flroida KingCharlemagne May 2015 #73
Did you read my post, or did you just get frustrated and respond? Agschmid May 2015 #74
No, I read your post. You think Bush actually won Florida in 2000. Whatever you've KingCharlemagne May 2015 #79
Oh I said that? I missed it... Agschmid May 2015 #92
Gore got 500,000+ more popular votes than Bush did nationwide Art_from_Ark May 2015 #118
Popular votes don't cut it. Agschmid May 2015 #120
So in other words Art_from_Ark May 2015 #197
We don't. Agschmid May 2015 #208
Pretty clear exposition, if you ask me. pangaia May 2015 #78
Possibly Sherman A1 May 2015 #3
I think he could win the general election. SheilaT May 2015 #4
Certainly. People are tired of the same old crap. PowerToThePeople May 2015 #5
Exactly TexasBushwhacker May 2015 #122
Bernie does. bluesbassman May 2015 #6
No he doesn't. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #17
Nice. Guess we have Clinton supporters calling Senator Sanders a liar now. bluesbassman May 2015 #28
I can't wait to hear their pathetic red-baiting shit after Sanders knocks her off in Iowa KingCharlemagne May 2015 #59
Can't wait is right! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2015 #110
What makes you think I'm a Clinton supporter? Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2015 #103
In order for the Republicans to win... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #163
Since the war, only one party has won after 8 years in power, in 1988. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #192
Voting has never been as polarized and demographically driven as it is now... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #199
Let's hope they're right and I'm wrong N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #200
I am painfully aware of the three term jinx. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #201
Another feature of that page is that Bernie Sanders isn't given any chance muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #204
Odds can change...I don't believe Hillary or any other Democrat is inevitable. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #205
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #68
Yes, I do. Scootaloo May 2015 #8
Because he's "concerned." [n/t] Maedhros May 2015 #195
Well I'm concerned about all those goats traipsing over bridges willy-nilly Scootaloo May 2015 #196
Yes - they should instead throw out one or more fishing lines, baited with lures or bait fish, Maedhros May 2015 #229
I don't think he could win, but... TreasonousBastard May 2015 #9
I doubt it but who knows at this point gwheezie May 2015 #10
All the John states John Kerry won plus Ohio Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #11
I wouldn't be surprised to see Bernie pick up something in the south. Vinca May 2015 #57
...and Ohio elected and re-elected John Kasich; Wisconsin elected and re-elected Scott Walker brooklynite May 2015 #116
Have you ever watched a steel mill sit empty for 10 years and rust away in front of your face? Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #152
All those Reoublicans were elected in those ten years... brooklynite May 2015 #155
This message was self-deleted by its author Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #164
Wouldn't a lot of those aging issues fly in FL too? (nt) Jackpine Radical May 2015 #129
Yeah Florida is probably the oldest state Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #137
Yes, I do Marrah_G May 2015 #12
sure, if he can beat Hillary quaker bill May 2015 #13
Yes, it is technically true that if he can beat Hillary then he can win the general election. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #23
so, no worries then. quaker bill May 2015 #32
About Sanders, or DU? Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #33
Been here for a primary season? quaker bill May 2015 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #14
They said this black guy could never win... DiverDave May 2015 #15
The Black guy, and his supporters, convienced enough Dems ... JoePhilly May 2015 #113
Huh? They most certainly did attack Obama supporters DiverDave May 2015 #203
I think some people genuinely do. I find this kind of depressing. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #16
You want reality based? Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #19
Technically that is true, yes. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #21
you are not making sense quaker bill May 2015 #34
Huh? AgingAmerican May 2015 #134
He is saying he can't beat Hillary muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #158
Yeah, and she was supposed to be inevitable 6 years ago, too. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #25
8 years ago, Obama was already competitive in the polls muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #37
There's a recent PPP poll from Washington hootinholler May 2015 #49
You mean just in Washington State? muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #62
Yes. The national poll was a few days after the announcement hootinholler May 2015 #85
Obama won by discarding national polls during the primary. State by state is the Exilednight May 2015 #101
John Kerry was the only one who would win quaker bill May 2015 #30
So somehow you think that being on DU takes us out of the real world and we cannot possibly jwirr May 2015 #117
Serious answer - I think he has a BETTER chance at winning a general than the primary. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #18
Completely agree. n/t MadrasT May 2015 #86
Did anyone really think that a peanut farmer from Plains Georgia OutNow May 2015 #20
Yes, in both cases. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #22
Frankly, any Democratic was going to win in 1976 TexasBushwhacker May 2015 #124
I think people want a leader who actually leads, who isn't afraid to take actual positions on actual Warren DeMontague May 2015 #24
We have a long history of candidates being a longshot, but who have ideas the people want.... dmosh42 May 2015 #26
When people get to know him they love him. Kalidurga May 2015 #27
I think our "David" has a good chance to defeat the Goliath we are against. tiredtoo May 2015 #29
As things stand now? No. DFW May 2015 #36
"prickly, grumpy old man" is an ageist ad hominem HereSince1628 May 2015 #38
Yet that's the label many here used about McCain in 2008 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2015 #161
It was also an ageist ad hominem then HereSince1628 May 2015 #198
+1 And I don't find Bernie to be prickly or grumpy. Live and Learn May 2015 #228
No doubt in my mind madokie May 2015 #39
"It is better to vote for what you want and lose than to vote for what you dont want and win" CentralMass May 2015 #40
"It is better to vote to get half of what you want than vote for what you want and get none" brooklynite May 2015 #154
I think he has a better chance than Hillary. Many seem to Exilednight May 2015 #41
The times they are a-changin' - happened in the 60's & its happening now. Divernan May 2015 #42
He could. But I don't think the DNC & the PTB will allow him to get the nom. RiverLover May 2015 #43
What if anything can we do to get rid of the superdelagates? jwirr May 2015 #119
Have enough people vote for him that the 20% superdelegate vote is irrelevant. /nt RiverLover May 2015 #218
Well I guess we are working for that. jwirr May 2015 #219
I believe he could. I believe whoever we nominate would beat any of the idiotic rethugs. we can do it May 2015 #44
Sure, if this is the election in which social media outpaces the mainstream media. I also like ... Scuba May 2015 #45
Absolutely hootinholler May 2015 #46
That is how democracy is supposed to work, isn't it? Anybody can win? nt bemildred May 2015 #47
Not really hack89 May 2015 #71
LOL. Thanks. nt bemildred May 2015 #72
Only the person with the most votes. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #88
Bernie is a very experienced politician, elected many times, no? bemildred May 2015 #93
"I'm going to preface this preachy scolding with a bullshit question." cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #50
I don't think he can win the election no GusBob May 2015 #51
You are wrong - when people get to know him they love him. Where do you see humor as a part of jwirr May 2015 #121
Yes. sendero May 2015 #52
depends on your economic/percentage status. reddread May 2015 #53
People get excited to go to casinos and give away money Renew Deal May 2015 #54
Serious question...does anyone really think Hillary Clinton would win a general election? - nt KingCharlemagne May 2015 #55
She'd lose; "donations" to CFF would come to a screeching halt. Divernan May 2015 #77
So Bernie can win, but Hillary can't? Is this bizarro world?!? Metric System May 2015 #94
My, aren't you precious? - nt KingCharlemagne May 2015 #123
The oddsmaker who have to pay out their own money when they lose do DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #167
Your post betrays a singularly jejeune notion of what oddsmakers and bookies KingCharlemagne May 2015 #172
I don't believe my post was jejune. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #176
You implied that bookies and oddsmakers actually paid with their own money, when the reality is that KingCharlemagne May 2015 #177
It was a quote from a gaming site, hence the quotation marks I used, ergo: DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #179
HRC will motivate the misogynist base of the Republicans to come out to vote like few KingCharlemagne May 2015 #185
Oddsmakers don't predict the election. They predict the betting. Jim Lane May 2015 #227
I understand that... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #234
Yes ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2015 #175
The news will not give him equal time. The end. patricia92243 May 2015 #58
One can't know. That's one of the reasons we have presidential primaries. Smarmie Doofus May 2015 #60
I do not think that Bernie Sanders will be viable in a general election Gothmog May 2015 #61
Yes, I do rock May 2015 #64
Yes Bernie can win newfie11 May 2015 #66
Some ageism in there no? Agschmid May 2015 #67
I am voting for him. I don't put my wet finger in the wind to see what everyone else is doing, that GoneFishin May 2015 #70
Tell you? 99Forever May 2015 #75
No randr May 2015 #76
"prickly, grumpy old man" handmade34 May 2015 #80
I do. H2O Man May 2015 #81
If Sanders beats Hillary in the Primaries he can win the General. It would change all perceptions Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #82
My simplest answer; Yes, he has a real shot. Half-Century Man May 2015 #83
Sanders can win a general Man from Pickens May 2015 #84
Yes. I think he can win. LWolf May 2015 #90
Nobody thought Alberta would... CanSocDem May 2015 #91
America will not elect a Socialist in 2016 redstateblues May 2015 #96
Bernie gets elected every six years. He is a socialist. nt bemildred May 2015 #100
By the 2nd smallest electorate in the nation, and almost uniformly snow-white, too. Orrex May 2015 #141
It definitely shows that americans will elect socialists. It is a fact. nt bemildred May 2015 #144
It's a meaningless fact. Orrex May 2015 #156
It means Bernie is a Senator, that is how it works. nt bemildred May 2015 #157
No shit. And he'll remain a Senator. Orrex May 2015 #159
I am addressing the notion that americans will not elect socialists, they will and they do. nt bemildred May 2015 #169
Who put forth that notion? Orrex May 2015 #173
Thanks for clearing that up redstateblues May 2015 #189
On the ballot, he would be listed as a Democrat Art_from_Ark May 2015 #225
Right, America will never elect a Catholic-black-woman-socialist-whathaveyou in 2016. bemildred May 2015 #237
Can Clinton win a seriously contested election? The next time would be the first. TheKentuckian May 2015 #95
With Bernie at the top of the ticket we're headed for an electoral wipeout. It will make the 80s Metric System May 2015 #97
Let me ask you a serious question fredamae May 2015 #98
No i don't think he will win. hrmjustin May 2015 #99
I Will No Longer Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious May 2015 #102
So you are saying Hillary is evil? redstateblues May 2015 #191
I Am Saying That She Is Bought And Paid For By Wall Street As We Already Know cantbeserious May 2015 #193
Heh. OilemFirchen May 2015 #207
Maybe HassleCat May 2015 #104
I have a serious guestion for you BluegrassDem olddots May 2015 #106
Yes! Yes I do! haikugal May 2015 #107
Does anyone really think Hillary Clinton would win a general election? earthside May 2015 #108
"But Mrs. Hillary Clinton heading the Democratic ticket in 2016 is a landslide loser." DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #174
I'm old enough to remember ... earthside May 2015 #183
I would actually have to see the odds and polling from the races you cited. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #188
Nobody but the people. cyberswede May 2015 #114
Yes. Hilary was the presumed 2008 nominee, until an inexperienced one term Sen was elected! EndElectoral May 2015 #115
Wasn't it a half term? Seem to remember he didn't finish the term to become President. libdem4life May 2015 #138
"He's a prickly, grumpy old man" --->personal attack. Is it ok to call Hillary a &#%^&@%#* now too? L0oniX May 2015 #125
Funny how that works, huh? 99Forever May 2015 #130
I'm going to quote the last guy who people said could not be elected, Barack Obama, the night he was Bluenorthwest May 2015 #126
Absolutely...people are hungry and hurting, HELL YES randys1 May 2015 #127
Grumpy old man? Bohemianwriter May 2015 #128
Would you vote for Lou Grant? Jackpine Radical May 2015 #132
if the repugs nominate Huckleberry I can see anyone beating him dlwickham May 2015 #131
in 2007, nobody thought we'd elect a black guy as president: Ken Burch May 2015 #133
If he doesn't win then we are stuck with another POTUS repaying favors onecaliberal May 2015 #135
If I thought he could lead us more toward a nation like Denmark, I'd be behind him completely. Hoyt May 2015 #136
When was the last time someone to the far left or right of their party won? Reter May 2015 #139
He is not that far left really Rosa Luxemburg May 2015 #230
Bernie would be luck to win his home state in the general workinclasszero May 2015 #142
I think it's too early to say. n/t malthaussen May 2015 #145
Since the only candidates the Repukes LibDemAlways May 2015 #153
i am not so sure drray23 May 2015 #233
I think Bernie's message would have broad populist appeal. If LibDemAlways May 2015 #236
Reading through this thread again leaves me with one question. LWolf May 2015 #160
Hillary is an imperious, arrogant old woman. Marr May 2015 #162
No, not in the real world. n/t Lil Missy May 2015 #165
Yes. In fact, if he's the nominee he will restore faith in the electoral system. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #168
I don't really know anymore. I thought HRC would beat the POTUS in 2008. Rex May 2015 #170
Obama can't possibly win! ...or so we were told. Kip Humphrey May 2015 #178
Yes. His problem is the primaries. Eleanors38 May 2015 #180
Reading through this hilarious thread, I get a sense of Déjà vu. Remember this guy? Tarheel_Dem May 2015 #181
Yes, I seriously think he can win. Even if he doesn't, every revolution has to start somewhere. liberal_at_heart May 2015 #184
And of course there was this guy who was the next Great White Hope. Tarheel_Dem May 2015 #186
It took this guy to show 'em all how it's done. Tarheel_Dem May 2015 #187
He already has... kentuck May 2015 #190
Did anyone think that Obama would win the general election? Rosa Luxemburg May 2015 #194
She's a Cracked Actor with a past, he's someone people can trust . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #202
He's not someone people can trust to beat the Republicans... brooklynite May 2015 #206
Didn't we ask the same question about Obama in 2007? muntrv May 2015 #209
I think most Democrats would win over a Republican in this era. bravenak May 2015 #210
And this is why I wrote we might be at one of those moments nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #214
You're confusing primaries with the general election. Stop it. Warpy May 2015 #211
Yes. nt RiffRandell May 2015 #212
You asked a serious question, so I will give you a very serious answer nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #213
The conventional wisdom. bravenak May 2015 #221
As I wrote, we might be in one of those moments nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #223
I hope so. I really do. bravenak May 2015 #224
Sure. Very possible. immoderate May 2015 #215
Concerned, huh? TBF May 2015 #216
As opposed to what, a prickly, grumpy old woman? Octafish May 2015 #217
if he can win the democratic primary JI7 May 2015 #220
Yes (nt) bigwillq May 2015 #222
Yes. daleanime May 2015 #226
He is great. JDPriestly May 2015 #231
Of course he won't MaggieD May 2015 #232
Neoliberalism has a lifetime opponent in me. They didn't before. mmonk May 2015 #235
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2017 #238
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question...does a...»Reply #160