General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Suppose a group has declared a "safe space" on public property or a place of public accommodation [View all]Orrex
(63,185 posts)The OP was about groups and safe spaces on public property, but you retroactively decided that your question excluded groups able to declare safe spaces on public property.
Having changed the parameters of the OP's question, you then unilaterally declared that safe spaces do not exist. That's false in any case, but it also lacks specificity, since you absolutely didn't specify that you were excluding private property from that absolute restriction.
So no, I'm not conflating private and public property at all--that's another of your attempts to misstate my position (after another of your attempts to redefine your question). You may indeed have distinguished between private and public spaces, but you did so only after your absolute declaration that safe spaces don't exist.
If you meant "safe spaces cannot exist on public property," then perhaps you should have done a better job in writing your post.
So that's on you.