Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
3. SCOTUSs decision is all that matters
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:26 PM
Dec 2017

And we can safely assume where they would stand.

Otherwise, I don’t see why — based on SCOTUS’s own precedent that the Executive can be civilly sued for actions occurring before the presidency — that a president couldn’t be indicted and tried. As long as the SENTENCE didn’t happen unt afterward.

In reality, even with a friendly court, this would be a terrible precedent to set. Can you imagine how many “crimes” a black president would have committed by now?

(There are statutes and precedents, by the way, for criminally prosecuting a sitting executive, although not an American president)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former Watergate Counsel ...»Reply #3