Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,183 posts)
25. SANDERS: We haven't come up with an exact number yet,
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jan 2016

Nope, no plan yet.. still waiting.

Wealthiest will pay more but not as much as under Eisenhower
Q: Let's get specific. How high would you go on tax rates? You have said before you would go above 50%.

SANDERS: We haven't come up with an exact number yet, but it will not be as high as the number under Dwight D. Eisenhower, which was 90%. I'm not that much of a socialist compared to Eisenhower. But we are going to end the absurdity, as Warren Buffet often reminds us, that billionaires pay an effective tax rate lower than nurses or truck drivers. That makes no sense at all. There has to be real tax reform, and the wealthiest and large corporations will pay when I'm president.

Gov. O'MALLEY: May I point out that under Ronald Reagan's first term, the highest marginal rate was 70%. And in talking to a lot of our neighbors who are in that super wealthy, millionaire and billionaire category, a great numbers of them love their country enough to do more again in order to create more opportunity for America's middle class.
Source: 2015 CBS Democratic primary debate in Iowa , Nov 14, 2015

That's nice. truthisfreedom Jan 2016 #1
Last week Bernie was going to raise taxes on the middle class, this week he doesn't have a plan. A Simple Game Jan 2016 #2
The oligarch has spoken SmittynMo Jan 2016 #3
NPR... lol...sure Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #4
NPR is the most honest radio info source in America. Hortensis Jan 2016 #23
By listening to thier broadcasts. The perpetual Pro TTP newscasts thats comes from them Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #27
Interesting. I'm dialed to an old favorite Hortensis Jan 2016 #31
Yeah here in New Orleans, it's pretty heavy, Pro Oil stories (go figure), pro TPP. very blatant. Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #32
I'll program New Orleans in (WNNO?). It'll be a nice change Hortensis Jan 2016 #35
Cool Beans! They do have some really nice programming here. Cooking (Go figure) cultural stuff. Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #40
Of course, NO = cooking. I don't switch Hortensis Jan 2016 #43
They've swung too far right over the years passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #46
Yep, they are now infested by Koch tumors much like the DLC was when it was created... cascadiance Jan 2016 #55
The 4 Points JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #5
Sure, it sounds good. But thats it. it wont raise that much money. 7962 Jan 2016 #11
Isn't that kinda like the NRA's argument against Hortensis Jan 2016 #29
Hey - let's just keep everything the same! JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #37
How bout "lets keep everything honest"? 7962 Jan 2016 #49
Then join me in supporting JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #50
I do like him. And bikinis.. 7962 Jan 2016 #51
Ha! JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #53
Another weak policy by Hillary 4dsc Jan 2016 #44
I don't know - I'm supporting O'Malley JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #45
Better than nothing, but too late in the game passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #47
I'm supporting O'Malley JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #48
As long as the Rethugs control at least one house of Congress customerserviceguy Jan 2016 #6
She's only had 25 years to put her plans together! elias49 Jan 2016 #7
And Bernie has not posted his health care plan with details on his web page after 40 years riversedge Jan 2016 #12
Oy. Wouldn't it be great to have a 40-year-old plan! elias49 Jan 2016 #13
I see you did not get on the thread to the poster about riversedge Jan 2016 #15
Wouldn't it be great to have a 40-year old website? That would be a cool trick too. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #34
Well, I would hope so. Hissyspit Jan 2016 #8
"self-styled Democratic Socialst" sulphurdunn Jan 2016 #9
Window dressing. 7962 Jan 2016 #10
You need to read her proposals-She has the details for th "what ELSE" (your words) she riversedge Jan 2016 #14
I read the article in the OP. Wont raise very much. 7962 Jan 2016 #20
... Javaman Jan 2016 #22
So big corrporations Geronimoe Jan 2016 #16
November 15, 2015 Javaman Jan 2016 #17
SANDERS: We haven't come up with an exact number yet, riversedge Jan 2016 #25
you asked for a proposal. Javaman Jan 2016 #28
No need to get snippy. You linked to a Q & A with various dates wersite. That is not riversedge Jan 2016 #30
LOL so what do you consider a "coherent" proposal? Javaman Jan 2016 #38
SANDERS: We haven't come up with an exact number yet, riversedge Jan 2016 #26
had to answer twice because once wasn't enough LOL Javaman Jan 2016 #39
At this point, and I have been at this point for quite a while, I do not believe her campaign djean111 Jan 2016 #18
exactly questionseverything Jan 2016 #54
This belongs on GD-P. I wish DU had moderators. PSPS Jan 2016 #19
Too little, too late shawn703 Jan 2016 #21
Congratulations Uponthegears Jan 2016 #24
And people actually believe she'll try to execute on this plan? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #33
I have a problem with the estate tax Angel Martin Jan 2016 #36
I don't have a problem with it. noamnety Jan 2016 #41
I'm with you on that. eom BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #42
Reaaaaaly not that hard to set up a trust for the house. jeff47 Jan 2016 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News» Clinton Would Raise Tax...»Reply #25