Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,319 posts)

8. None of the examples Justice Thomas cites to support the point that mail-in voting is prone ...

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Mon Feb 22, 2021, 06:02 PM

Feb 2021

None of the examples Justice Thomas cites to support the point that mail-in voting is prone to fraud are from the latest presidential election.

He only cites a newspaper article from 2012, a case from 1994, and absentee ballot fraud by Republicans in a 2018 congressional race.

Link to tweet

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court won't take up challenge to Pennsylvania presidential election results [View all] BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 OP

So the a- holes from PA are still trying to upset the applecart Butterflylady Feb 2021 #1

I think this was the last minute case they filed awhile ago BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #2

Yes, that's correct DeminPennswoods Feb 2021 #4

The expedited review had been rejected but he was able to get a regular review BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #6

It's hilarious SCOTUS strung Kelly along DeminPennswoods Feb 2021 #7

Court documents (from DEMOCRACY DOCKET) brooklynite Feb 2021 #3

Good decision. How would you set election rules for 50 states based on one state? bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #5

None of the examples Justice Thomas cites to support the point that mail-in voting is prone ... mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2021 #8

From our Lt. Gov. John Fetterman on that issue BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #9