Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oldsoftie

(12,533 posts)
17. Judges ruling was based on "standing", not lack of evidence.
Thu Oct 14, 2021, 07:12 AM
Oct 2021

As I said on another post, I HATE decisions like that because now the trumpers will all scream "technicality!". Yes, the judge says he reviewed the "evidence" and saw no fraud, but that wasnt his decision.
He should have let the case move forward & then ruled against them based on their shitty claims. And maybe charged them with lying to the court

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Georgia ballot inspection...»Reply #17