The 3 justices who voted against this are clearly not fit to sit on the Supreme Court because they (Reply #48)

In the discussion thread: The Supreme Court rules that Joe Biden is commander-in-chief. Three justices dissent. [View all]

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Mar 26, 2022, 09:34 AM

Martin68 (19,996 posts)

48. The 3 justices who voted against this are clearly not fit to sit on the Supreme Court because they

cannot or will not make decisions that are not based on their political/ideological biases.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

75 replies	Author	Time	Post
The Supreme Court rules that Joe Biden is commander-in-chief. Three justices dissent. [View all]	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Mar 2022	OP
Clarence...	JoeOtterbein	Mar 2022	#1
I was about to ask	Jarqui	Mar 2022	#31
Pressure needs to be applied to this disgusting pig to get him to resign...retire...whatever ...	Hulk	Mar 2022	#60
He can't handle the pressure and stress...	raising2moredems	Mar 2022	#69
The Roberts Kangaroo Kourt.	The Unmitigated Gall	Mar 2022	#2
Roberts voted with the majority.	Martin68	Mar 2022	#49
Speaking in general terms.	The Unmitigated Gall	Mar 2022	#53
Sounds to me Court reached the right decision.	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#3
It should have been unanimous	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Mar 2022	#5
Probably. But there are times when troops need to say, No. Would	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#9
A person who does not wish to take the vax is free	vanlassie	Mar 2022	#33
I agree 100%, vanlassie.	Prof. Toru Tanaka	Mar 2022	#55
But they're all, each and every one, heros. Right?	jaxexpat	Mar 2022	#61
at the very least	Blackjackdavey	Mar 2022	#74
They asked for Religious Exemptions to getting vaccinated	kwijybo	Mar 2022	#38
There are times	atreides1	Mar 2022	#56
There is no such thing in the military as an "illegal order."	Haggis 4 Breakfast	Mar 2022	#68
And Thomas should have recused.	soldierant	Mar 2022	#58
How does a case like that even get to SCOTUS?	brush	Mar 2022	#11
However, there are times that troops need to say "No, MFer"-- William Calley's massacre for ex.	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#12
Troops are obligated to refuse an illegal order.	wnylib	Mar 2022	#13
Well, I'm fully vaxxed and boosted, but many rubes -- for whatever reason -- do question whether	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#16
I wasn't responding to the vaccine order.	wnylib	Mar 2022	#22
Well, I think the Court had to rule on whether mandated vaccines are legal. I think so, but as I	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#25
I hate to keep having to say this, but	COL Mustard	Mar 2022	#40
Agreed and it should be an administrative discharge.	Prof. Toru Tanaka	Mar 2022	#66
I doubt many troops are aware of that obligation to refuse an illegal order	70sEraVet	Mar 2022	#41
Uh...no, you are wrong...	radicalleft	Mar 2022	#45
Genuinely glad to know I'm wrong.	70sEraVet	Mar 2022	#46
Of course that's true.	COL Mustard	Mar 2022	#67
Come on. Taking vaccines to insure military readiness is not an illegal order.	brush	Mar 2022	#21
If trump told me to take a vaccine, I'd darn sure question its efficacy. Biden I trust.	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#27
It's neither Biden or trump. It's commanding officers and...	brush	Mar 2022	#73
Washington knew that! He lost half the expeditionary force...	TreasonousBastard	Mar 2022	#72
This will keep things simpler.	Karadeniz	Mar 2022	#4
KR! too bad for the Dissenters.. that	Cha	Mar 2022	#6
Good, this could have carried over to other orders. Should've been unanimous. Nt	Baked Potato	Mar 2022	#7
I think the dissenters were strategic.	plimsoll	Mar 2022	#8
Saw the headline and thought "Gotta be The Onion!"	Talitha	Mar 2022	#10
Same	SledDriver	Mar 2022	#20
Exactly what I thought. JHC.	Evolve Dammit	Mar 2022	#39
I have to admit--I did not know what to think.	riversedge	Mar 2022	#51
Partisan? Fuck! The Supreme Court is 3/7ths Russian.	dchill	Mar 2022	#14
Yet the tfg judges voted for Biden ... weird, interesting ...	fierywoman	Mar 2022	#15
That is one bright spot, the SC held firm on trump's BS.	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#17
Not necessarily good	speak easy	Mar 2022	#19
My reading was, "Sorry, bud, you lost, suck it up." Seems like the ruled that over 25 times.	Hoyt	Mar 2022	#23
ok. ty	speak easy	Mar 2022	#29
They've ruled against trump on more than one occasion.	oldsoftie	Mar 2022	#44
gorsuch dissented.	niyad	Mar 2022	#36
I guessed 'right'. Thomas and Alito are garbage.	speak easy	Mar 2022	#18
Those three are saying "religious liberty" outweighs the very structure of our gov't	NullTuples	Mar 2022	#24
I'm still waiting for someone to show me the part of the Bible that covers vaccines. nt	oldsoftie	Mar 2022	#43
The RCC's argument was that they used cells made from stem cells for developing the vaxxes	NullTuples	Mar 2022	#62
But from what I understand, Pfizer & Moderna did NOT use any aborted fetal cells	oldsoftie	Mar 2022	#64
There you go, being all logical again...	NullTuples	Mar 2022	#70
I guess I really need to work on that!	oldsoftie	Mar 2022	#71
Case should never have been in the civilian courts in the first place and	cstanleytech	Mar 2022	#26
Isn't Clarence in the hospital?	karin_sj	Mar 2022	#28
He was released. Also, due to COVID they do more remote meetting, voting now.	L. Coyote	Mar 2022	#30
I was hoping he'd be released	COL Mustard	Mar 2022	#52
Interesting how in Alito's dissent	Aviation Pro	Mar 2022	#32
I thought this was The Onion. nt	Trueblue Texan	Mar 2022	#34
Interesting....	paleotn	Mar 2022	#35
This message was self-deleted by its author	MustLoveBeagles	Mar 2022	#37
What a clickbait headline. This was a "religious rights" case. Which they shouldn't win	oldsoftie	Mar 2022	#42
Yeah, I agree with NOT allowing vaccine exemptions	Farmer-Rick	Mar 2022	#50
I agree. And why is no one ever asked "what part of your religion covers vaccines?"	oldsoftie	Mar 2022	#54
Exactly	Farmer-Rick	Mar 2022	#59
The dissenters should be ejected from the court they clearly are irrational and should not be....	usaf-vet	Mar 2022	#47
The 3 justices who voted against this are clearly not fit to sit on the Supreme Court because they	Martin68	Mar 2022	#48
I'm more surprised that Kavanaugh and Barrett ruled with the majority.	ificandream	Mar 2022	#57
The decision by the court is not what the OP headline suggests.	former9thward	Mar 2022	#63
did the 3 justicesbweight in on who is the CIC?	Dan	Mar 2022	#65
A win is a win	The Grand Illuminist	Mar 2022	#75

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.