Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Darwins_Retriever

(851 posts)
48. Actually I don't think a federal pro-abortion bill would survive a court challenge
Fri May 6, 2022, 10:09 AM
May 2022

For federal laws to supersede state laws require a federal interest. I think Congress should push for a law protecting women crossing state or international boarders for abortions. This uses the federal superiority in areas of interstate commerce and movement. The law could protect the woman and whomever is helping her from the laws that permit individuals to file suit against women and their helpers.

Concerns! Polybius May 2022 #1
My first thought rpannier May 2022 #36
Case where the perfect is the enemy of the good? exboyfil May 2022 #2
If it meant getting a bill passed 867-5309. May 2022 #4
If her & Murkowski's bill could get passed, then go with THAT one. oldsoftie May 2022 #38
"Politics is the art of the possible" The Mouth May 2022 #52
I totally agree. And you're right on the numbers. oldsoftie May 2022 #53
And why should a Catholic hospital get to turn away patients? Lonestarblue May 2022 #40
My daughter who worked for a catholic hospital had to go elsewhere to get a D&C efhmc May 2022 #43
My vascetomy doctor was shut down exboyfil May 2022 #46
Here is the irony: her goal was to have children and that was a sad event for her. efhmc May 2022 #50
That looks like an opening. madaboutharry May 2022 #3
As long as those they're both negotiating in good faith. Mister Ed May 2022 #12
I know. madaboutharry May 2022 #16
Yes, flaky is the first word PatSeg May 2022 #41
"Flakey", ok, but I'd go with "fake" too for Collins. She figuratively clutches... brush May 2022 #64
Oh yes, definitely "fake" PatSeg May 2022 #65
Yep. You'd think voters would tire of the innocent... brush May 2022 #66
And she probably gets sympathy PatSeg May 2022 #67
What's her medical condition? I wasn't aware of that. brush May 2022 #68
Something to do with her shaky, trembling voice PatSeg May 2022 #70
Why bother? quakerboy May 2022 #24
People keep forgetting we're in a minority-ruled country. PSPS May 2022 #32
The law also doesn't force catholic hospitals to perform abortions, so what's the problem? Galraedia May 2022 #5
I used to work for a hospital that was established by Roman Catholic nuns but when in2herbs May 2022 #23
A huge % of hospitals are owned by Catholics. gab13by13 May 2022 #39
"Collins has introduced her own bill with Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski" How many votes PoliticAverse May 2022 #6
Concerns over scope, WTF, she must have it mixed up with a colonoscopy yaesu May 2022 #7
since when do catholic hospitals have rights ????? AllaN01Bear May 2022 #8
remember Mitt Romney said corporations are people, too agingdem May 2022 #11
Collins "citing concerns." You don't say! dchill May 2022 #9
what ever happened to sep of church and state ?? in the sep clause ? AllaN01Bear May 2022 #10
I just recieved permission from my partner to say Cheezoholic May 2022 #13
if you're a woman then you can say it.. agingdem May 2022 #15
I'm 60 years old Cheezoholic May 2022 #20
I'm 73 and it's one of my favorite words agingdem May 2022 #21
Your words to my lips, can i have an Amen lol n/t Cheezoholic May 2022 #25
AMEN! agingdem May 2022 #26
What the fuck is wrong with you obamanut2012 May 2022 #37
Agree with you. JudyM May 2022 #58
Seriously Cheezoholic May 2022 #71
Shocked. Shocked I tell you. AZLD4Candidate May 2022 #14
Outing herself as an obviously anti choice political. ColinC May 2022 #17
Susan Collins is a Decepticon ZonkerHarris May 2022 #18
The largest, wealthiest religious organization on the planet needs the protection of Susan Collins. DFW May 2022 #19
Any group which is still as destructive to females as the RCC is is evil. efhmc May 2022 #51
Who is forcing Catholic hospitals to perform abortions? IronLionZion May 2022 #22
The bill would require 60 to pass. former9thward May 2022 #29
Or a filibuster carve out exboyfil May 2022 #44
FUCK YOUR CONCERNS YOU FUCKER! Coventina May 2022 #27
Okay. Fuck here and the stagnant river she floats on. n/t TeamProg May 2022 #28
Bullshit! She's falling in line with Republicans vlyons May 2022 #30
I will never again take Collins seriously unless she says something PROVABLE.... steve2470 May 2022 #31
Screw you and your concerns, Susie. The Court radicals lied to you, and you lie to us. Hekate May 2022 #33
I think Collins is basically well intentioned considering she's a politician. GoldandSilver May 2022 #34
Now she is concerned, Jesus what an idiot! Emile May 2022 #35
she's the worst kind of disingenuous piece of shit. nt Javaman May 2022 #42
Here is a copy of the Collins-Murkowski bill exboyfil May 2022 #45
"GOP supporter of abortion rights" my ass. malthaussen May 2022 #47
Actually I don't think a federal pro-abortion bill would survive a court challenge Darwins_Retriever May 2022 #48
ZaSu strikes again. heckles65 May 2022 #49
Collins is lying through her teeth when she says cstanleytech May 2022 #54
The perfect is the enemy of the good. Mz Pip May 2022 #55
Collins lies as easily as she breathes. mn9driver May 2022 #56
I knew she'd find a reason not to defend a woman's right to choose. patphil May 2022 #57
The lying weasel finally shows her true colors Wicked Blue May 2022 #59
And what if a woman with an ectopic pregnancy... myccrider May 2022 #60
The poor little thing MOMFUDSKI May 2022 #61
Catholic hospitals don't have to provide abortions now SpankMe May 2022 #62
I'm so tired of her. Mad_Machine76 May 2022 #63
OK. Then support PLANNED PARENTHOOD! CTyankee May 2022 #69
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Collins expected to oppos...»Reply #48