Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mad_Machine76

(24,409 posts)
12. I don't understand
Mon Aug 29, 2022, 11:24 AM
Aug 2022

Has this *always* been a thing and nobody noticed it before? I didn't know that running or serving in elected office shielded anybody from normal legal processes until now? We've always had political officials investigated, deposed, indicted, arrested, prosecuted, and even jailed while serving in or running for offices before. When did it change that suddenly elected officials are becoming more shielded from being subject to the same legal processes as everybody else just because there is an election coming up that they are running in?! They subjected Clinton to everything, including depositions WHILE he was in office because Judges determined that he had no absolute legal immunity, even while actively serving as POTUS.


BTW how does it make sense to allow individuals whom are investigation to evade accountability while they are running to hold elective office no matter how close or far it is to the election? Shouldn't people be able to make sure that they're not electing a crook or a very bad person to elected office, especially to the Presidency?!

Well, here we go with the "too close to an election" bs SheltieLover Aug 2022 #1
Well he's running for re-election BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #2
Idaf what his aspirations are SheltieLover Aug 2022 #6
The odd dynamics down there BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #9
I sure hope so! SheltieLover Aug 2022 #15
Yeah Mad_Machine76 Aug 2022 #3
Absofuckingloutely! SheltieLover Aug 2022 #7
If Kemp were worried about the political ramification of the fallout, he shouldn't have participated Orrex Aug 2022 #4
Really looks like a cover-up now. Should energize the Dem base even more in GA. Samrob Aug 2022 #33
It's how the "they're out to get us" candidates will play their victim-patriot voters. ancianita Aug 2022 #5
Ah, yes. - The classic "commit any crime or get out of any legal commitment Politicub Aug 2022 #8
Well Historic NY Aug 2022 #10
Well then, if he is convicted of crime then kacekwl Aug 2022 #11
Grand Jury is going after tRump KS Toronado Aug 2022 #13
You're absolutely right. But he sure isn't acting like one. mjvpi Aug 2022 #24
You nailed his quandary BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #26
I don't understand Mad_Machine76 Aug 2022 #12
I believe this went into effect, Bayard Aug 2022 #18
In this case, it's not removing the requirement for Kemp to testify BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #20
I know they're not removing it Mad_Machine76 Aug 2022 #21
He's trying to fly under the radar BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #28
Your last sentence. Yes, yes, yes! mjvpi Aug 2022 #25
Thanks Mad_Machine76 Aug 2022 #27
It's August for goodness sake... BlueIdaho Aug 2022 #14
Fine. This will be hanging over his head during the hottest part of his election season. Novara Aug 2022 #16
So, if I have an upcoming job interview maxrandb Aug 2022 #17
+1000 Mad_Machine76 Aug 2022 #22
The question I hope Abrams keeps asking voters is why Kemp is afraid to testify under oath. Lonestarblue Aug 2022 #19
We know the real answer to that Mad_Machine76 Aug 2022 #23
Of fucking course orangecrush Aug 2022 #29
Article should be titled "Judge provides a hail Mary pass to Republicans". cstanleytech Aug 2022 #30
Do they need him? Smackdown2019 Aug 2022 #31
He's not at risk of prosecution. He's a prosecution witness, not a "party of interest" Bucky Aug 2022 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge delays Gov. Kemp's ...»Reply #12