Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Freethinker65

(9,998 posts)

3. Wow. Lots of meds can "produce abortions" or are teratogenic if preganant.

Reply to News Junkie (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2023, 10:45 AM

Jan 2023

I assume she is proposing denying legal medications to every South Dakotan, or is she just singling out females of child bearing age? Pretty sure that is not constitutional. Perhaps resign and classify woman as merely property and not human beings in South Dakota?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

South Dakota Gov. Noem threatens charges for abortion pills [View all] News Junkie Jan 2023 OP

Pure grandstanding. Pharmacy chains have already said they will not sell abortion pills in states Lonestarblue Jan 2023 #1

I wonder if this is akin to sales bans of plants to states and territories Model35mech Jan 2023 #13

But not condoms....... Lovie777 Jan 2023 #2

Post removed Post removed Jan 2023 #7

wait...wut? ragheads? and cow? ret5hd Jan 2023 #9

Wow. Lots of meds can "produce abortions" or are teratogenic if preganant. Freethinker65 Jan 2023 #3

South Dakota, Republican assholes since 1889. jaxexpat Jan 2023 #4

I'm pretty sure men will provide their mistresses the pills tho.... Lovie777 Jan 2023 #5

Enjoying all your freedom, South Dakota? Mysterian Jan 2023 #6

This does not have a heartbeat & yet has more rights than women. CrispyQ Jan 2023 #8

Thank you BlueSky3 Jan 2023 #10

I can't believe the pro-choice movement hasn't' plastered this image on billboards, CrispyQ Jan 2023 #14

Yes, me too. BlueSky3 Jan 2023 #16

Some should ask her if her husband should be allowed to get a vasectomy.... turbinetree Jan 2023 #11

Ah, but we must not forget Farmer-Rick Jan 2023 #20

good one...... turbinetree Jan 2023 #21

Doctors can prescribe for off-label uses. keithbvadu2 Jan 2023 #12

What about a woman's privacy? Maraya1969 Jan 2023 #15

Women are not human, therefore they have no privacy. niyad Jan 2023 #19

I swear, it won't be long now before these misogynists start wearing the blood-red Aristus Jan 2023 #28

They have not been pretending for a very long time. This time, their robes are black. niyad Jan 2023 #29

And there's a woman in their ranks. Aristus Jan 2023 #31

Some women align themselves with the patriarchy, thinking they will be the special ones, the niyad Jan 2023 #32

How soon before keroro gunsou Jan 2023 #35

Probably already has. niyad Jan 2023 #36

It's time for the Federal gov to step in and slap the taste out of these fascist states. Ny yaesu Jan 2023 #17

She is a perfect example of a self-loathing woman. niyad Jan 2023 #18

I propose a new law Jerry2144 Jan 2023 #22

HEAR!!!! HEAR!!!! niyad Jan 2023 #30

Hypocrisy - thy name is Republican 3825-87867 Jan 2023 #23

It's unenforceable Warpy Jan 2023 #24

Desperate to remain relevant to the Magat's. NoMoreRepugs Jan 2023 #25

They should just ban sex. James48 Jan 2023 #26

Ah-hah jmowreader Jan 2023 #27

God these people suck. Initech Jan 2023 #33

Does she know every woman in her state personally and their medical issues and family situations? Rhiannon12866 Jan 2023 #34