Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)

22. SO, just to be clear, you SUPPORT a nation seizing and annexing part of another nation...

Reply to newthinking (Reply #17)

Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:19 PM

Dec 2014

... in violation of sovereignty and treaty? I mean, half (or more) of the nations of Europe couple justify invasion and annexation if we're going to play your silly game. I mean, why shouldn't Germany retake Pomerania and Saxony from Poland?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russia dismisses new US sanctions as useless [View all] Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP

well, with the mideast wars winding down, time to gin up new threats, or recycle old ones. KG Dec 2014 #1

of course they are Bosonic Dec 2014 #2

Vlad the Liar davidpdx Dec 2014 #19

Translation: The Russian Economy Is Tanking n/t DallasNE Dec 2014 #3

Yeah but we love those gas prices . . . n/t Spooky69 Dec 2014 #4

...so useless your economy's in a nose dive. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #5

Methinks the tovarishchi are protesting too much DFW Dec 2014 #6

Sucks to be you Vlad. Maybe next time you'll try an honest, open election before you lay claim to okaawhatever Dec 2014 #7

Only if you ignore reality and history-UKRAINE ANNEXED Crimea against the will of the people newthinking Dec 2014 #9

Wow, that's a creative interpretation of history. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #10

Do your research. I am not going to do it for you newthinking Dec 2014 #11

Here's what the historical facts are: NuclearDem Dec 2014 #12

Who's version is creative lol?? newthinking Dec 2014 #14

Your "version" is a nationalistic one justifying an invasion of a sovereign country. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #15

Did you read the history yet? newthinking Dec 2014 #17

First up, history major. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #18

SO, just to be clear, you SUPPORT a nation seizing and annexing part of another nation... Adrahil Dec 2014 #22

No, I abhor the innacurate angry narrative that avoids the complexity newthinking Dec 2014 #27

Yes, yes... It's all the nasty West's fault... Adrahil Dec 2014 #28

Depth in mass journalism is gone. Here is a link to a wikipedia page newthinking Dec 2014 #13

Bookmarking for a few weeks later. :-| n/t DeSwiss Dec 2014 #8

Useless? Ryan Fitzomething Dec 2014 #16

Sure they are useful. roamer65 Dec 2014 #20

They are useless... Xolodno Dec 2014 #21

So which is it? Adrahil Dec 2014 #23

Thought the implication was obvious... Xolodno Dec 2014 #24

OK. I don't agree, but I do understand your position now. n/t Adrahil Dec 2014 #25

Every country has their own Baghdad Bob, I suppose. BillZBubb Dec 2014 #26