Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
But there's no quid pro quo. Her supporters told me, so it must be true. Scuba Nov 2015 #1
Que Bono - Why Of Course - The 1% At The Expense Of The 99% cantbeserious Nov 2015 #3
HRC - The 1% Serving The 1% cantbeserious Nov 2015 #2
Oh my, directors and philanthropists donated to the Clinton Foundation! leftofcool Nov 2015 #4
"Charity" from the rich is blood money bread_and_roses Nov 2015 #8
MOVE ALONG, THERE IS NOTHING TO SEE HERE. You've been told this before!! 7962 Nov 2015 #5
1st time seeing this SmittynMo Nov 2015 #17
OK, hope you're sitting down.......That was a dude. 7962 Nov 2015 #19
Holy shit SmittynMo Nov 2015 #21
Isn't that why people give money to politicians, because they do not want the LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #6
But in this case, the "givers' view points included NAFTA, ending Glass-Stiegel and so forth. Hoppy Nov 2015 #10
If we get more of the same, SmittynMo Nov 2015 #16
knr Douglas Carpenter Nov 2015 #7
Now the Washington Post is part of the vast right-wing conspiracy? davidpdx Nov 2015 #9
Sadly, a LOT of her supporters will say pretty much what you just did. nt 7962 Nov 2015 #20
There's a distinct and determined blindness Plucketeer Nov 2015 #30
I agree with most of what you said davidpdx Nov 2015 #37
Yes - not going to be easy at all Plucketeer Nov 2015 #41
OMG... Punkingal Nov 2015 #11
Ha Ha Ha Sam Walton donated $6000. Gary 50 Nov 2015 #12
I think he croaked before they could really put the arm on him. Fuddnik Nov 2015 #15
"Both Clintons declined to be interviewed or comment for this article." antigop Nov 2015 #13
Too busy trying to find a way to spin it.... Punkingal Nov 2015 #18
can't defend the indefensible. nt antigop Nov 2015 #29
Why does the Washington Post hate Amerika? Fuddnik Nov 2015 #14
Nice way to conflate the political donations with those to the foundation. uberblonde Nov 2015 #22
Grrrrr! Grrrrr! They're just so MAAAAD, too! MADem Nov 2015 #33
Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation is on Charity Navigator's Watchlist notadmblnd Nov 2015 #35
This was posted two weeks ago Sophiegirl Nov 2015 #23
it happens a lot. you can post something at the "wrong" time and it sinks like a stone magical thyme Nov 2015 #28
Dead Broke! DEAD Broke! SoapBox Nov 2015 #24
K & R AzDar Nov 2015 #25
I'd a thunk ejbr Nov 2015 #26
More than $150,000,000 as "paid speakers". Smells bad to me. TryLogic Nov 2015 #27
Smells worse than Congressional book advance deals. Fuddnik Nov 2015 #31
These people don't know how to give to charity themselves, they must give to the Clintons to do it EndElectoral Nov 2015 #32
This "article" is a cheap attempt at misrepresenting donations to the Clinton foundation.... George II Nov 2015 #34
Well it appears some people have trouble with the truth... MattSh Nov 2015 #36
sad... KoKo Nov 2015 #43
K&R Proserpina Nov 2015 #38
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Nov 2015 #39
On behalf of Demeter, who is locked out of DU for posting this piece Proserpina Nov 2015 #42
That is a shame, I hope she comes back soon. Uncle Joe Nov 2015 #44
kick nt antigop Nov 2015 #40
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Washington Post: Insi...»Reply #21