Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Quixote1818

(28,918 posts)

3. I agree, but it's 150 years later and millions of people have settled on lands once set aside for

Reply to DeSwiss (Reply #2)

Mon May 19, 2014, 02:19 AM

May 2014

Native Americans where treaties were broken. Should they all be uprooted now because American politicians were fuck faces back then? These are tough issues for sure though and if there is a way to give a lot of those lands back to the Natives where people have not settled we probably should but I am not a layer and I don't know how the laws are written now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Absurd Double Standard on Bundy Cattle Ranch [View all] Quixote1818 May 2014 OP

I'd like to go back and seize some familial real estate in London from 500 years ago. freshwest May 2014 #1

I'm sure it was ''chaos'' for the Indians to lose it too. :-| n/t DeSwiss May 2014 #2

I agree, but it's 150 years later and millions of people have settled on lands once set aside for Quixote1818 May 2014 #3

Many seems to have no problem with uprooting... Bohemianwriter May 2014 #6

But the Indians were heathens. Enthusiast May 2014 #4

Liberty and justice for all* tclambert May 2014 #5