Election Reform
In reply to the discussion: Should presidents be allowed to run for more than two terms? [View all]eppur_se_muova
(36,247 posts)And that was largely because the country didn't want to change leaders in the middle of a war, which was a good decision.
Voters don't need to be "protected" from their decisions. They have chosen well enough without the 22nd Amendment. The only President who could have been elected to a third term since was Clinton -- and wouldn't that have been BETTER than W? Even if Clinton had lost, he could have run again in 2004 -- how do you think THAT would have turned out? Think how different our recent history would have been without the 22nd Amendment -- maybe no 9/11, certainly no Iraq War, maybe warning signs on Wall Street would have registered in time. No, I don't think Presidential term limits have done us any good at all, and quite a bit of harm.