Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
4. I'm not clear on their methodology but their probabilities sum to more than 100%.
Thu Jun 11, 2015, 12:14 PM
Jun 2015

It's not just rounding, either, because if you look at the full chart with all the very long shots, the probabilities total 135%.

I also note that their numbers can change very rapidly. There was an update at 11:34 a.m., about an hour and a half after your post, with Clinton and Sanders each going up a bit.

My own chart (my methodology being to pull numbers out of my ass) would have Sanders and O'Malley higher, Biden and Warren lower. The toughest one to set a number on is Clinton. Certainly she's the heavy favorite at this point, but the Convention is so far in the future that 77% strikes me as too high. OTOH, I think at least one DUer has made Clinton something like 95%.

A final note: Lincoln Chafee doesn't even make their chart. I give him a better chance than some of the people who are at 1% on the chart, like John Hickenlooper and Rahm Emanuel.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Interest in chart on Odds...»Reply #4