Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Waiting for FDR July 13-15, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)16. Follow-On Civil Litigation Emerges as LIBOR Scandal Continues to Unfold
http://www.dandodiary.com/2012/07/articles/securities-litigation/followon-civil-litigation-emerges-as-libor-scandal-continues-to-unfold/
...In the wake of Barclays record fines, the regulatory investigation continues, and authorities reportedly have also launched criminal investigations. Along with the governmental investigatory and enforcement activity has also come civil litigation activity as well. The latest suit to be filed is an antirust action filed I on July 6, 2012 in the Southern District of New York. The complaint, which can be found here, alleges that Barclays, several Barclays entities, and several other banks, conspired to artificially manipulate the reported European Interbank Offered Rates (EURIBOR), which, the complaint alleges is the baseline interest rate used in the valuation of more than $200 trillion in derivative financial products.
The complaint, which purports to be filed on behalf of a class of persons or entities in the United States who purchased EURIBOR-related financial instruments between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009, relies heavily on documents, emails and other materials and information amassed as part of the governmental investigations. The complaint alleges that the defendants entered an agreement in restraint of trade, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The complaint also alleges violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. The plaintiffs lawyers July 6, 2012 press release about the EURIBOR antitrust suit can be found here. SEE LINK...
The recent EURIBOR antitrust action is far from the only civil action to follow in the wake of the governmental investigation. According to a May 2012 PLUS Journal article by Eric Scheiner and Jennifer Quinn Broda of the Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold law firm entitled Move Over Subprime? Financial Institutions and Brokers Face Increasing Concerns Over Allegation of Improper Libor Manipulation (here), in 2011, at least 21 class action lawsuits were filed I n various U.S. federal courts against numerous Libor member banks. These lawsuits were instituted by institutional investors who purchased interest rate swaps tied to Libor and who claim they lost millions through the alleged manipulation of the interbank rate or who lost money on other interest-rate sensitive investments and instruments. Further background about these antitrust suits, which have now been consolidated, can be found here...Nor are these institutional investor lawsuits the only suits to emerge. According to a June 27, 2012 memo from the Kennedys law firm (here), there have also already been at least two shareholders derivative lawsuits filed, one brought by a Bank of America shareholder and another by a Citigroup shareholder, against former and current directors and officers of those firms, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty regarding lack of oversight relating to the banks purported manipulation and suppression of LIBOR as early as 2006.
...
What all of this may mean from an insurance perspective also remains to be seen. The regulatory fines and penalties are not likely to be covered. The companies costs incurred in the regulatory investigations also are not likely to be covered, as the typical D&O policy provides little coverage for entity related investigative costs, particularly outside of the securities law context....
...In the wake of Barclays record fines, the regulatory investigation continues, and authorities reportedly have also launched criminal investigations. Along with the governmental investigatory and enforcement activity has also come civil litigation activity as well. The latest suit to be filed is an antirust action filed I on July 6, 2012 in the Southern District of New York. The complaint, which can be found here, alleges that Barclays, several Barclays entities, and several other banks, conspired to artificially manipulate the reported European Interbank Offered Rates (EURIBOR), which, the complaint alleges is the baseline interest rate used in the valuation of more than $200 trillion in derivative financial products.
The complaint, which purports to be filed on behalf of a class of persons or entities in the United States who purchased EURIBOR-related financial instruments between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009, relies heavily on documents, emails and other materials and information amassed as part of the governmental investigations. The complaint alleges that the defendants entered an agreement in restraint of trade, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The complaint also alleges violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. The plaintiffs lawyers July 6, 2012 press release about the EURIBOR antitrust suit can be found here. SEE LINK...
The recent EURIBOR antitrust action is far from the only civil action to follow in the wake of the governmental investigation. According to a May 2012 PLUS Journal article by Eric Scheiner and Jennifer Quinn Broda of the Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold law firm entitled Move Over Subprime? Financial Institutions and Brokers Face Increasing Concerns Over Allegation of Improper Libor Manipulation (here), in 2011, at least 21 class action lawsuits were filed I n various U.S. federal courts against numerous Libor member banks. These lawsuits were instituted by institutional investors who purchased interest rate swaps tied to Libor and who claim they lost millions through the alleged manipulation of the interbank rate or who lost money on other interest-rate sensitive investments and instruments. Further background about these antitrust suits, which have now been consolidated, can be found here...Nor are these institutional investor lawsuits the only suits to emerge. According to a June 27, 2012 memo from the Kennedys law firm (here), there have also already been at least two shareholders derivative lawsuits filed, one brought by a Bank of America shareholder and another by a Citigroup shareholder, against former and current directors and officers of those firms, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty regarding lack of oversight relating to the banks purported manipulation and suppression of LIBOR as early as 2006.
...
What all of this may mean from an insurance perspective also remains to be seen. The regulatory fines and penalties are not likely to be covered. The companies costs incurred in the regulatory investigations also are not likely to be covered, as the typical D&O policy provides little coverage for entity related investigative costs, particularly outside of the securities law context....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Corporations Dodge LIBOR Scandal Bullet: It’s banks and hedge funds that look like the losers.
Demeter
Jul 2012
#34
Unfortunately, they're probabaly right that it'll take a long time to sort out the consequences; but
snot
Jul 2012
#59
How Out-of-Control Credit Markets Threaten Liberty, Democracy and Economic Security By Ed Harrison
Demeter
Jul 2012
#30
The Great Capitalist Heist: How Paris Hilton’s Dogs Ended Up Better Off Than You
Demeter
Jul 2012
#35
Another "this should be a separate thread", and what of the outcome for this repeat? I'd love to
mother earth
Jul 2012
#39