Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Repent! The End Is Here! July 20-22, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)19. Slick “No Labels” Plan to Duck Debate, Cut Social Security & Coddle 1% By Richard (RJ) Eskow
http://www.nationofchange.org/slick-no-labels-plan-duck-debate-cut-social-security-and-coddle-1-1342537940
The Jeff Daniels character from The Newsroom would know what to ask the operators of an allegedly grass roots group called No Labels:
Why won't you publish your list of donors?
What's wrong with having legislators debate the issues publicly? Isn't that how representative democracy works?
How can you call yourself 'centrist' when so many of your ideas are unpopular, and in fact are too conservative for most Tea Party members?
He might have another question, too:
What's wrong with labels? Don't they let us know what we're buying?
The Newsroom is fiction, of course. But then, so is No Labels. It's the creation of overpaid political insiders who work hand in glove with longtime opponents of Social Security and Medicare, pushing the agenda of the wealthiest among us by exploiting the public's understandable frustration with gridlocked government. I'm sure that some decent people are attracted to No Labels without realizing that a label is precisely what's needed. Labeling would tell them that the group was designed and created by and for political hacks from both parties, who scrupulously hide their funding sources but are associated with people like anti-Social Security billionaire Pete Peterson.
The No Labels website describes it as a group of Republicans, Democrats and independents dedicated to a simple proposition: We want to help move America from the old politics of point-scoring toward a new politics of problem-solving. The group claims to oppose the powerful interest groups (who) work to push our leaders and our political parties apart, adding: They demand rigid commitment to far left or far right ideology, and they ruthlessly punish people who step out of line.
No Labels has never caught on, despite massive publicity and lots of funding. So why is it even worth mentioning? Because it sheds light on a much larger plan, a richly funded sales blitz that's hyping far-right positions as mainstream opinion and pushing lobbyists and political operatives as the plain-spoken voices of Main Street America. We'll be seeing a lot more of this crowd right after the election, as the No Labels crowd tries to sell us a Grand Bargain which protects the wealthy while demanding ever deeper and greater sacrifices from the rest of us.
MORE SKULDUGGERY AT LINK
The Jeff Daniels character from The Newsroom would know what to ask the operators of an allegedly grass roots group called No Labels:
Why won't you publish your list of donors?
What's wrong with having legislators debate the issues publicly? Isn't that how representative democracy works?
How can you call yourself 'centrist' when so many of your ideas are unpopular, and in fact are too conservative for most Tea Party members?
He might have another question, too:
What's wrong with labels? Don't they let us know what we're buying?
The Newsroom is fiction, of course. But then, so is No Labels. It's the creation of overpaid political insiders who work hand in glove with longtime opponents of Social Security and Medicare, pushing the agenda of the wealthiest among us by exploiting the public's understandable frustration with gridlocked government. I'm sure that some decent people are attracted to No Labels without realizing that a label is precisely what's needed. Labeling would tell them that the group was designed and created by and for political hacks from both parties, who scrupulously hide their funding sources but are associated with people like anti-Social Security billionaire Pete Peterson.
The No Labels website describes it as a group of Republicans, Democrats and independents dedicated to a simple proposition: We want to help move America from the old politics of point-scoring toward a new politics of problem-solving. The group claims to oppose the powerful interest groups (who) work to push our leaders and our political parties apart, adding: They demand rigid commitment to far left or far right ideology, and they ruthlessly punish people who step out of line.
No Labels has never caught on, despite massive publicity and lots of funding. So why is it even worth mentioning? Because it sheds light on a much larger plan, a richly funded sales blitz that's hyping far-right positions as mainstream opinion and pushing lobbyists and political operatives as the plain-spoken voices of Main Street America. We'll be seeing a lot more of this crowd right after the election, as the No Labels crowd tries to sell us a Grand Bargain which protects the wealthy while demanding ever deeper and greater sacrifices from the rest of us.
MORE SKULDUGGERY AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Biggest Banking Scandal this Summer (Hint: It’s not LIBOR) By Christopher Petrella
Demeter
Jul 2012
#6
Slick “No Labels” Plan to Duck Debate, Cut Social Security & Coddle 1% By Richard (RJ) Eskow
Demeter
Jul 2012
#19
Six Ways the Federal Reserve Could Boost the Economy By Adam S. Hersh and Cameron DeHart
Demeter
Jul 2012
#21
Libor fraud exposes Wall Street’s rotten core By Elizabeth Warren YES, THAT ELIZABETH WARREN
Demeter
Jul 2012
#28
Titanic Banks Hit LIBOR Iceberg: Will Lawsuits Sink the Ship? By Ellen Brown IF YOU ONLY READ 1
Demeter
Jul 2012
#30
Krugmenistan vs. Estonia THE DISH ON KRUGMAN, MAKING FRIENDS AND INFLUENCING PEOPLE
Demeter
Jul 2012
#41
This could be a great opportunity for a retirement community...for the prematurely unemployed
Demeter
Jul 2012
#63
Bill Moyers and Chris Hedges: How Whole Regions of America Have Been Destroyed in the Name of profit
xchrom
Jul 2012
#60
(Mid- 70's) "would be the closest America ever came to Utopia for many a generation"
bread_and_roses
Jul 2012
#71