Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 23 July 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)31. The Lawlessness of the European Central Bank By Matthew Yglesias
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/07/13/the_lawlessness_of_the_european_central_bank.html
Zoe Chace has an informative but tonally off piece about how the European Central Bank has decided to stop doing its job and start making decisions outside the scope of its formal authority instead.
The way this works is pretty simple. Central banks are supposed to stabilize demand. Stabilizing demand properly is crucially important to short-term economic growth. But in the long-term, other things matter much more than demand stabilization. Smart politicians don't want to have their country's short-term growth prospects crushed by inappropriate monetary policy. And smart economists know that long-term growth is the most important thing of all. So since central banks are staffed by smart economists, it's tempting to do what the European Central Bank is doing and simply forget about stabilizing aggregate demand correctly and instead use monetary policy as a weapon.
As Chace puts it:
Thanks to its unusual powers, the ECB has succeeded in forcing European governments to do things they otherwise might not have.
There are many problems with this approach, starting with the fact that it's illegal. For one thing, it completely blurs the lines of democratic accountability and will ultimately undermine the wellsprings of good governance. This is important, because even though the European Central Bank staff certainly seems to think it knows what the secrets are to long-term growth, the fact of the matter is that this is very controversial. We're used to hearing people of a "progressive" bent talking about stimulus while more conservative types talk about structural reform, but two can play at this game. Take Jeffrey Sachs, for example, who's basically doing the same thing from the left and insisting that it would somehow be wrong to solve America's demand shortfall unless we first embrace an ambitious eco-egalitarian economic reform agenda.
These are important questions; they're questions that national legislatures have to sort out. Central bankers have to stick to a relatively narrow set of goals and be held accountable when they fail to meet those goals.
Zoe Chace has an informative but tonally off piece about how the European Central Bank has decided to stop doing its job and start making decisions outside the scope of its formal authority instead.
The way this works is pretty simple. Central banks are supposed to stabilize demand. Stabilizing demand properly is crucially important to short-term economic growth. But in the long-term, other things matter much more than demand stabilization. Smart politicians don't want to have their country's short-term growth prospects crushed by inappropriate monetary policy. And smart economists know that long-term growth is the most important thing of all. So since central banks are staffed by smart economists, it's tempting to do what the European Central Bank is doing and simply forget about stabilizing aggregate demand correctly and instead use monetary policy as a weapon.
As Chace puts it:
Thanks to its unusual powers, the ECB has succeeded in forcing European governments to do things they otherwise might not have.
There are many problems with this approach, starting with the fact that it's illegal. For one thing, it completely blurs the lines of democratic accountability and will ultimately undermine the wellsprings of good governance. This is important, because even though the European Central Bank staff certainly seems to think it knows what the secrets are to long-term growth, the fact of the matter is that this is very controversial. We're used to hearing people of a "progressive" bent talking about stimulus while more conservative types talk about structural reform, but two can play at this game. Take Jeffrey Sachs, for example, who's basically doing the same thing from the left and insisting that it would somehow be wrong to solve America's demand shortfall unless we first embrace an ambitious eco-egalitarian economic reform agenda.
These are important questions; they're questions that national legislatures have to sort out. Central bankers have to stick to a relatively narrow set of goals and be held accountable when they fail to meet those goals.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The whole scam is just so massive. It's just mind boggling how complicit the richest criminals have
mother earth
Jul 2012
#9
These 12 Hellholes Are Examples Of What The Rest Of America Will Look Like Soon
Demeter
Jul 2012
#25
How Whole Regions of America Have Been Destroyed in the Name of Quarterly Profits
Demeter
Jul 2012
#50
I know some do not appreciate Taibbi, but who else tells it like it is? Looking forward to "more".
mother earth
Jul 2012
#11
I know, seems like RS & Vanity Fair have stepped up enormously. I love MattT.
mother earth
Jul 2012
#17
Holding Off Armageddon: The Libor Scandal In Full Perspective By Paul Craig Roberts
Demeter
Jul 2012
#8
Exclusive: Prosecutors, regulators close to making Libor arrests (REST THE CASE)
Demeter
Jul 2012
#14
Raining like mad in the markets, too. US Futures looking UG-LEE. Italy down 5%
Roland99
Jul 2012
#40