Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Batten Down the Hatches October 26-28, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)78. Paying Taxes to Your Boss: A Step Toward 21st Century Feudalism
http://truth-out.org/news/item/12366-paying-taxes-to-your-boss-a-step-toward-21st-century-feudalism
...Though a lot of Americans really (really, really) hate paying taxes, most of us can at least justify it as our contribution to some greater good, whether its the broad range of social programs favored by progressives or a libertarian night watchman state. But what if the government instead told us, We dont want your money, but we would like to make friends with some rich guys, so just give it to them and let them have fun with it? That could soon be the law of the land in Pennsylvania, where the state legislature has passed a bill that would, as Philadelphia City Paper blogger Daniel Denvir describes it, allow companies that hire at least 250 new workers in the state to keep 95-percent of the workers' withheld income tax. These workers will essentially be paying their employers for the privilege of having a job. Some have called this corporate socialism, but it also calls to mind an even older economic model that was once popular in Europe except back then, the bosses were called lords. Its a more modern innovation in the U.S., but combined with increased political pressure from employers and a crackdown on workers rights, it all adds up to feudalism, American-style.
The Pennsylvania bill is just the most recent example of state income taxes being turned into employer subsidies. Its already the law of the land in one form or another in 19 states, and according to Good Jobs First, its taking $684 million a year out of the public coffers. The theory is that this will boost job creation. But the authors of the Good Jobs First report note, payments often go to firms that simply move existing jobs from one state to another, or to ones that threaten to move unless they get paid to stay put. In other words, its more like extortion than stimulus. With state governments facing a projected $4 trillion budget shortfall and continuing to cut social services and public sector jobs, they can hardly afford to be wasting money on companies that already have plenty and have no intention of putting it to good use. And the more governments turn over their privileges to businesses, the more the distinction between the two becomes blurred.
But if corporations have state governments over a barrel, they have their employees stuffed inside the barrel and ready to plunge down the waterfall. As Ive noted before, some conservatives view all taxation as theft, but theres surely no better term for what happens when employers promise their workers a certain wage or salary and then pocket some of the money for themselves. When you pay taxes to the government, you get something in return, whether its a school for your kids or a road to drive on or a firefighter to rescue you from a burning building. When you pay taxes to your boss, you well, you give your boss your money. Your only reward is that you get to continue to work the land, so to speak. The lords didnt consult with the peasants on which tapestries they should buy with the money they collected from them.
Did I forget to mention that these employers arent even required to tell their workers that this is how their income taxes are being used? Journalist David Cay Johnston, who covers this issue in his new book, The Fine Print: How Big Companies Use Plain English to Rob You Blind, writes that this bait-and-switch is stealthy by design. Of course it is; if these workers were important enough to know where their money is going, it wouldnt be legal to steal it...
...Though a lot of Americans really (really, really) hate paying taxes, most of us can at least justify it as our contribution to some greater good, whether its the broad range of social programs favored by progressives or a libertarian night watchman state. But what if the government instead told us, We dont want your money, but we would like to make friends with some rich guys, so just give it to them and let them have fun with it? That could soon be the law of the land in Pennsylvania, where the state legislature has passed a bill that would, as Philadelphia City Paper blogger Daniel Denvir describes it, allow companies that hire at least 250 new workers in the state to keep 95-percent of the workers' withheld income tax. These workers will essentially be paying their employers for the privilege of having a job. Some have called this corporate socialism, but it also calls to mind an even older economic model that was once popular in Europe except back then, the bosses were called lords. Its a more modern innovation in the U.S., but combined with increased political pressure from employers and a crackdown on workers rights, it all adds up to feudalism, American-style.
The Pennsylvania bill is just the most recent example of state income taxes being turned into employer subsidies. Its already the law of the land in one form or another in 19 states, and according to Good Jobs First, its taking $684 million a year out of the public coffers. The theory is that this will boost job creation. But the authors of the Good Jobs First report note, payments often go to firms that simply move existing jobs from one state to another, or to ones that threaten to move unless they get paid to stay put. In other words, its more like extortion than stimulus. With state governments facing a projected $4 trillion budget shortfall and continuing to cut social services and public sector jobs, they can hardly afford to be wasting money on companies that already have plenty and have no intention of putting it to good use. And the more governments turn over their privileges to businesses, the more the distinction between the two becomes blurred.
But if corporations have state governments over a barrel, they have their employees stuffed inside the barrel and ready to plunge down the waterfall. As Ive noted before, some conservatives view all taxation as theft, but theres surely no better term for what happens when employers promise their workers a certain wage or salary and then pocket some of the money for themselves. When you pay taxes to the government, you get something in return, whether its a school for your kids or a road to drive on or a firefighter to rescue you from a burning building. When you pay taxes to your boss, you well, you give your boss your money. Your only reward is that you get to continue to work the land, so to speak. The lords didnt consult with the peasants on which tapestries they should buy with the money they collected from them.
Did I forget to mention that these employers arent even required to tell their workers that this is how their income taxes are being used? Journalist David Cay Johnston, who covers this issue in his new book, The Fine Print: How Big Companies Use Plain English to Rob You Blind, writes that this bait-and-switch is stealthy by design. Of course it is; if these workers were important enough to know where their money is going, it wouldnt be legal to steal it...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Businessman Billed A Cold-Call Firm $13 For Every Minute They Wasted His Time—And Won
xchrom
Oct 2012
#31
Obama says he’ll renew pursuit of ‘grand bargain,’ offering specifics on agenda
Demeter
Oct 2012
#39