Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Tuesday, 27 November 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)9. You Think You're Getting Social Security But You're Not, Says Multimillionaire Banker
http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/11/20/you-think-youre-getting-social-security-but-youre-not-says-multimillionaire-banker/
What should the U.S. do about the so-called "fiscal cliff"? Who better to ask than Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, "one of the world's most influential bankers"?
That's what CBS Evening News must have been thinking, anyway, when they did a segment last night (11/19/12) all about Blankfein's opinions. CBS's Scott Pelley began: "When we asked Blankfein how to reduce the federal budget deficit, he went straight for the subject that politicians don't want to talk about."
It's maddening, isn't it, when someone who obviously knows exactly what needs to be done insists on being so coy about it? Luckily, Blankfein did offer some specifics on one of those things that we think we're going to get, and aren't:
Huh. So Blankfeinwho was paid $16 million last year, and owns $210 million worth of his company's stockthinks that people can retire on Social Security after working for 25 years? As Gene Lyons pointed out, that would mean that people are getting their first paychecks when they're 42or, assuming they're willing to take the severe benefit cuts that come with early retirement, at 37. Or possibly he mistakenly believes Social Security allows you to retire at 41.
He also thinks people typically live to be 92 or 97, depending. In real life, of course, most people start working as early as 16, so they reach retirement age after 51 years of labor, when they have a life expectancy of 17 yearsor 14 years if they're an African-American man.
On the basis of this peculiar understanding of U.S. societywhich, strangely, doesn't seem to trouble Pelley at allBlankfein has some news for us:
You often hear this "we can't afford them" line, sometimes from people who aren't multimillionaires. For the record, in 1937, when the Social Security Act was passed, the per capita GDP of the U.S. was than $7,971. In 1965, when Medicare was created, it was $18,575. Today it's $42,671. (All figures in 2005 dollars.)
It's hard to figure out how we could afford to take care of our old people in 1937 and 1965, when our country was onequarter or onehalf as wealthy as it is today, but can't afford to do so today. Unless it has something to do with the fact that in 1937 and 1965people like Lloyd Blankfein didn't make $16 million a year.
VIDEO AT LINK
What should the U.S. do about the so-called "fiscal cliff"? Who better to ask than Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, "one of the world's most influential bankers"?
That's what CBS Evening News must have been thinking, anyway, when they did a segment last night (11/19/12) all about Blankfein's opinions. CBS's Scott Pelley began: "When we asked Blankfein how to reduce the federal budget deficit, he went straight for the subject that politicians don't want to talk about."
BLANKFEIN: You're going to have to undoubtedly do something to lower people's expectations. The entitlements, and what people think that they're going to get, because it's not going tothey're not going to get it.
PELLEY: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid?
BLANKFEIN: Some things.
PELLEY: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid?
BLANKFEIN: Some things.
It's maddening, isn't it, when someone who obviously knows exactly what needs to be done insists on being so coy about it? Luckily, Blankfein did offer some specifics on one of those things that we think we're going to get, and aren't:
And you can go back and you can look at the history of these things, and Social Security wasn't devised to be a system that supported you for a 30-year retirement after a 25-year career. So there will be certain things that the retirement age has to be changed, maybe some of the benefits have to be affected, maybe some of the inflation adjustments have to be revised.
Huh. So Blankfeinwho was paid $16 million last year, and owns $210 million worth of his company's stockthinks that people can retire on Social Security after working for 25 years? As Gene Lyons pointed out, that would mean that people are getting their first paychecks when they're 42or, assuming they're willing to take the severe benefit cuts that come with early retirement, at 37. Or possibly he mistakenly believes Social Security allows you to retire at 41.
He also thinks people typically live to be 92 or 97, depending. In real life, of course, most people start working as early as 16, so they reach retirement age after 51 years of labor, when they have a life expectancy of 17 yearsor 14 years if they're an African-American man.
On the basis of this peculiar understanding of U.S. societywhich, strangely, doesn't seem to trouble Pelley at allBlankfein has some news for us:
BLANKFEIN: But in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained.
PELLEY: Because we can't afford them going forward?
BLANKFEIN: Because we can't afford them.
PELLEY: Because we can't afford them going forward?
BLANKFEIN: Because we can't afford them.
You often hear this "we can't afford them" line, sometimes from people who aren't multimillionaires. For the record, in 1937, when the Social Security Act was passed, the per capita GDP of the U.S. was than $7,971. In 1965, when Medicare was created, it was $18,575. Today it's $42,671. (All figures in 2005 dollars.)
It's hard to figure out how we could afford to take care of our old people in 1937 and 1965, when our country was onequarter or onehalf as wealthy as it is today, but can't afford to do so today. Unless it has something to do with the fact that in 1937 and 1965people like Lloyd Blankfein didn't make $16 million a year.
VIDEO AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
MORE: NYSE Trading Glitch Hits 216 Securities, Zaps Half Of Average Trading Volume
Demeter
Nov 2012
#4
Local DAs Allowing Debt Collectors to Use Their Letterhead, Split Fees from Shakedown
Demeter
Nov 2012
#35
Beyond Debt/Deficit Politics: The $60T to End Federal Borrowing & Pay Off National Debt
Demeter
Nov 2012
#7
You Think You're Getting Social Security But You're Not, Says Multimillionaire Banker
Demeter
Nov 2012
#9
I always marvel at the condition of these. It's like they were hardly needed at all. Just one or two
jtuck004
Nov 2012
#50
Middle Class Shrinks to ALL-TIME LOW: Unemployment, Inequality Are Worse Than During the Recession
Demeter
Nov 2012
#15
Marcy Wheeler: Lanny Breuer Admits That Economists Have Convinced Him Not to Indict Corporations
Demeter
Nov 2012
#37