Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Gentlepeople, Start Your Weekend! April 19-21, 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)8. PA Court Deals Blow to Fracking Industry: Corporations Not The Same As Persons With Privacy Rights
http://www.alternet.org/fracking/pennsylvania-court-deals-blow-secrecy-obsessed-fracking-industry-corporations-not-same?akid=10315.227380.Wr3iNK&rd=1&src=newsletter823405&t=8&paging=off
A Pennsylvania judge in the heart of the Keystone States fracking belt has issued a forceful and precedent-setting decision holding that there is no corporate right to privacy under that states constitution, giving citizens and journalists a powerful tool to understand the health and environmental impacts of natural gas drilling in their communities.
Judge ODell Senecas ruling comes in an ongoing case where several newspapers sued to unseal a confidential settlement where major fracking corporations paid $750,000 to a family that claimed the gas drilling had contaminated their water and harmed their health. The Court ordered that settlement unsealed, enabling the papers, environmentalists and community rights advocates to examine the health issues and causes.
The Courts ruling is significant because the fracking companies have relied on secrecy agreements with landowners to hide the environmental and health impacts of gas drilling. Corporate lawyers even filed briefs in this case claiming that environmental and public health groups such as Earthjustice, Philadelphia Physicians for Social Responsibility and others were barred from submitting friend of the court briefs, which they recanted in a hearing, the ruling noted, because no such rule of exclusion exists.
But where the ruling is likely to make the biggest waves is in the so-called corporate personhood debate. The Judge spent more than a third of her 32-page decision saying why corporations and business entities were not the same as people under Pennsylvanias constitution, and why, for the purposes of doing business in the state, that federal court rulings that blur the rights of people and businesses do not apply...
IMPORTANT! MUST READ AND BOOKMARK!
In the absence of state law, business entities are nothing.
A Pennsylvania judge in the heart of the Keystone States fracking belt has issued a forceful and precedent-setting decision holding that there is no corporate right to privacy under that states constitution, giving citizens and journalists a powerful tool to understand the health and environmental impacts of natural gas drilling in their communities.
Whether a right of privacy for businesses exists within the prenumbral rights of Pennsylvanias constitution is a matter of first impression, wrote Washington County Court of Common Pleas Judge Debbie ODell Seneca late last month. It does not.
Judge ODell Senecas ruling comes in an ongoing case where several newspapers sued to unseal a confidential settlement where major fracking corporations paid $750,000 to a family that claimed the gas drilling had contaminated their water and harmed their health. The Court ordered that settlement unsealed, enabling the papers, environmentalists and community rights advocates to examine the health issues and causes.
The ruling represents the first crack in the judicial armor that has been so meticulously welded together by major corporations, said Thomas Linzey, executive director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, which has helped 150 communities in eight states adopt Community Bill of Rights to limit corporate powers. It affirms what many communities already know, that change only occurs when people begin to openly question and challenge legal doctrines that have been treated as sacred by most lawyers and judges.
The Courts ruling is significant because the fracking companies have relied on secrecy agreements with landowners to hide the environmental and health impacts of gas drilling. Corporate lawyers even filed briefs in this case claiming that environmental and public health groups such as Earthjustice, Philadelphia Physicians for Social Responsibility and others were barred from submitting friend of the court briefs, which they recanted in a hearing, the ruling noted, because no such rule of exclusion exists.
But where the ruling is likely to make the biggest waves is in the so-called corporate personhood debate. The Judge spent more than a third of her 32-page decision saying why corporations and business entities were not the same as people under Pennsylvanias constitution, and why, for the purposes of doing business in the state, that federal court rulings that blur the rights of people and businesses do not apply...
IMPORTANT! MUST READ AND BOOKMARK!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Propaganda System That Has Helped Create a Permanent Overclass Is Over a Century in the Making
Demeter
Apr 2013
#5
"Taking the Risk Out of Democracy: Corporate Propaganda versus Freedom and Liberty"
bread_and_roses
Apr 2013
#25
PA Court Deals Blow to Fracking Industry: Corporations Not The Same As Persons With Privacy Rights
Demeter
Apr 2013
#8
Solar panels could destroy U.S. utilities, according to U.S. utilities By David Roberts
Demeter
Apr 2013
#22
Could you be a little more specific about which of the many crazy things irks you?
Demeter
Apr 2013
#39
Margaret Thatcher – a strong leader, but a resolute failure by any other measure
xchrom
Apr 2013
#55