Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 11 October 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)2. Shutdown: Conservatives’ Revenge Against the “47 Percent”, Pt.1
http://ourfuture.org/20131010/shutdown-conservatives-revenge-against-the-47-percent-pt-1
During the first days of the government shutdown, conservatives were beside themselves with joy. Michele Bachmann (R, MN) told the Washington Post, Its exactly what we wanted, and we got it. Conservative media figures looked forward to a long siege that would ideally keep the government closed through the 2014 election. It was as if Republicans were relishing revenge against the 47 percent that Mitt Romney disdained during the 2012 election, and the rest of the American electorate for rejecting the GOPs agenda.
But conservatives arent just rejoicing over the success of their plan to shut down the government. Conservatives are also celebrating the consequences of the shutdown for those hit hardest by it: government workers, and those who rely on the services government agencies and workers provide. Conservatives believe shutting down the government is the right thing to do for the same reason they believed sequestration was the right thing to do. To understand this, one must first understand the conservative worldview as explained by George Lakoff.
In this worldview, the purpose of government is to protect the country by maximizing military and political strength, and promote unimpeded economic activity so that the disciplined moral people and undisciplined immoral people get what they deserve. You can tell who the disciplined moral people are by their worldly success. You can tell who the undisciplined immoral people are by their lack of success. Basically, the better off are better off because they are better people. The poor are poor because of their poor character. Promoting unimpeded economic activity means favoring the best people those who control wealth and power over those who are unsuccessful because they are morally weak.
Any government which impedes economic activity by the best people, through regulations designed to protect the consumers, workers, communities, etc., penalizes morality and discipline. Any government activity which protects the immoral undisciplined people from the economic consequences of their poor character rewards immorality and discipline. To conservatives, sequestration was a good start, but shutting down the government is even better. Sending government workers home without pay, and cutting off services to low-income Americans is the right thing to do. Plus, it means conservatives can force the country to conform to their worldview, without even having to win an election.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
Terrance Heath is the Online Producer at Campaign for America's Future. He has consulted on blogging and social media consultant for a number of organizations and agencies. He is a prominent activist on LGBT and HIV/AIDS issues.
During the first days of the government shutdown, conservatives were beside themselves with joy. Michele Bachmann (R, MN) told the Washington Post, Its exactly what we wanted, and we got it. Conservative media figures looked forward to a long siege that would ideally keep the government closed through the 2014 election. It was as if Republicans were relishing revenge against the 47 percent that Mitt Romney disdained during the 2012 election, and the rest of the American electorate for rejecting the GOPs agenda.
But conservatives arent just rejoicing over the success of their plan to shut down the government. Conservatives are also celebrating the consequences of the shutdown for those hit hardest by it: government workers, and those who rely on the services government agencies and workers provide. Conservatives believe shutting down the government is the right thing to do for the same reason they believed sequestration was the right thing to do. To understand this, one must first understand the conservative worldview as explained by George Lakoff.
Competition is necessary for a moral world; without it, people would not have to develop discipline and so would not become moral beings. Worldly success is an indicator of sufficient moral strength; lack of success suggests lack of sufficient discipline. Dependency is immoral. The undisciplined will be weak and poor, and deservedly so.
In this worldview, the purpose of government is to protect the country by maximizing military and political strength, and promote unimpeded economic activity so that the disciplined moral people and undisciplined immoral people get what they deserve. You can tell who the disciplined moral people are by their worldly success. You can tell who the undisciplined immoral people are by their lack of success. Basically, the better off are better off because they are better people. The poor are poor because of their poor character. Promoting unimpeded economic activity means favoring the best people those who control wealth and power over those who are unsuccessful because they are morally weak.
Any government which impedes economic activity by the best people, through regulations designed to protect the consumers, workers, communities, etc., penalizes morality and discipline. Any government activity which protects the immoral undisciplined people from the economic consequences of their poor character rewards immorality and discipline. To conservatives, sequestration was a good start, but shutting down the government is even better. Sending government workers home without pay, and cutting off services to low-income Americans is the right thing to do. Plus, it means conservatives can force the country to conform to their worldview, without even having to win an election.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
Terrance Heath is the Online Producer at Campaign for America's Future. He has consulted on blogging and social media consultant for a number of organizations and agencies. He is a prominent activist on LGBT and HIV/AIDS issues.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How about that DOW? The last 100 pts were pure HFT puffery (or pumping by the anti-plungers)
Demeter
Oct 2013
#1
When Michael Lewis wrote Liar's Poker he said he thought maybe people would see
jtuck004
Oct 2013
#51
Rinehart Family Trust Left Without Nominee for Manager{trashy billionaire infighting}
xchrom
Oct 2013
#16
oh man -- that is tough. please give your brother our best and to you as well. nt
xchrom
Oct 2013
#19
These Universities Are Cranking Out The Most Winners Of The Nobel Prize In Economics
xchrom
Oct 2013
#26