Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 11 December 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)19. The Government’s Secret Plan to Shut Off Cellphones and the Internet, Explained
http://billmoyers.com/2013/11/27/the-governments-secret-plan-to-shut-off-cellphones-and-the-internet-explained/
MUST READ THE WHOLE THING! HERE'S THAT END...
Critics contend that activating any kind of kill switch will do more harm than good. I find it hard to imagine why an Internet kill switch would ever be a good idea, short of some science fiction scenario wherein the network comes alive a la Terminator/Skynet, Feld says. At this point, so much of our critical infrastructure runs on the Internet that a kill switch would do more harm than anything short of a nuclear strike. It would be like cutting off our own head to escape someone pulling our hair. The same argument applies to smothering cellphone service. The benefit of people being able to communicate on their cellphones in times of crisis is enormous and cutting that off is in and of itself potentially very dangerous, argues Eva Galperin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Has the government ever turned off cell phones or the Internet? Yes but the only known reports concern cell service. In 2005, shortly after suicide bombers attacked the London tube, federal authorities disabled cell networks in four major New York tunnels. The action was reportedly taken to prevent bomb detonation via cellphone and according to a National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee review, it was undertaken without prior notice to wireless carriers or the public. (In an April statement to Mother Jones, Verizon denied have any role in shutting down cell service in New York.) In 2009, during Obamas inauguration, the feds used devices that blocked cellphones from receiving signals to prevent bomb detonation. In 2011, officials for the San Francisco transit system cut off cellphone service in four Bay Area Rapid Transit stations for several hours to preempt a planned protest over BART police fatally shooting a homeless man.
What are the constitutional problems? Civil liberties advocates argue that kill switches violate the First Amendment and pose a problem because they arent subject to rigorous judicial and congressional oversight. There is no court in the loop at all, at any stage in the SOP 303 process, according to the Center for Democracy and Technology. The executive branch, untethered by the checks and balances of court oversight, clear instruction from Congress, or transparency to the public, is free to act as it will and in secret. David Jacobs of EPIC says, Cutting off communications imposes a prior restraint on speech, so the First Amendment imposes the strictest of limitations We dont know how DHS thinks the kill switch is consistent with the First Amendment. He adds, Such a policy, unbounded by clear rules and oversight, just invites abuse.
What dont we know about the kill switch plan? A lot. We dont know the series of questions that help DHS determine whether it should activate a kill switch, how DHS will go about implementing the kill switch, how long a shutdown will last and what the oversight protocols are. For example, Jacobs from EPIC says that, it appears that DHS wouldnt have to call up the president to implement this, he would be involved in the same indirect way that he is with all kinds of executive branch actions. This information was requested in the FOIA lawsuit filed by (EPIC) and could be revealed as early as December. Hopefully exposure of such a lunatic idea will allow the public to beat some common sense into these agencies, says Feld.
Dana Liebelson is a reporter in Mother Jones Washington bureau.
MUST READ THE WHOLE THING! HERE'S THAT END...
Critics contend that activating any kind of kill switch will do more harm than good. I find it hard to imagine why an Internet kill switch would ever be a good idea, short of some science fiction scenario wherein the network comes alive a la Terminator/Skynet, Feld says. At this point, so much of our critical infrastructure runs on the Internet that a kill switch would do more harm than anything short of a nuclear strike. It would be like cutting off our own head to escape someone pulling our hair. The same argument applies to smothering cellphone service. The benefit of people being able to communicate on their cellphones in times of crisis is enormous and cutting that off is in and of itself potentially very dangerous, argues Eva Galperin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Has the government ever turned off cell phones or the Internet? Yes but the only known reports concern cell service. In 2005, shortly after suicide bombers attacked the London tube, federal authorities disabled cell networks in four major New York tunnels. The action was reportedly taken to prevent bomb detonation via cellphone and according to a National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee review, it was undertaken without prior notice to wireless carriers or the public. (In an April statement to Mother Jones, Verizon denied have any role in shutting down cell service in New York.) In 2009, during Obamas inauguration, the feds used devices that blocked cellphones from receiving signals to prevent bomb detonation. In 2011, officials for the San Francisco transit system cut off cellphone service in four Bay Area Rapid Transit stations for several hours to preempt a planned protest over BART police fatally shooting a homeless man.
What are the constitutional problems? Civil liberties advocates argue that kill switches violate the First Amendment and pose a problem because they arent subject to rigorous judicial and congressional oversight. There is no court in the loop at all, at any stage in the SOP 303 process, according to the Center for Democracy and Technology. The executive branch, untethered by the checks and balances of court oversight, clear instruction from Congress, or transparency to the public, is free to act as it will and in secret. David Jacobs of EPIC says, Cutting off communications imposes a prior restraint on speech, so the First Amendment imposes the strictest of limitations We dont know how DHS thinks the kill switch is consistent with the First Amendment. He adds, Such a policy, unbounded by clear rules and oversight, just invites abuse.
What dont we know about the kill switch plan? A lot. We dont know the series of questions that help DHS determine whether it should activate a kill switch, how DHS will go about implementing the kill switch, how long a shutdown will last and what the oversight protocols are. For example, Jacobs from EPIC says that, it appears that DHS wouldnt have to call up the president to implement this, he would be involved in the same indirect way that he is with all kinds of executive branch actions. This information was requested in the FOIA lawsuit filed by (EPIC) and could be revealed as early as December. Hopefully exposure of such a lunatic idea will allow the public to beat some common sense into these agencies, says Feld.
Dana Liebelson is a reporter in Mother Jones Washington bureau.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Bay Area Has A Values Problem: Non-Techies Are Dismissed as 'Unimportant to the Nation's Future"
Demeter
Dec 2013
#3
For beleaguered IRS, a crucial test still awaits after troubled rollout of health-care law
Demeter
Dec 2013
#9
The Government’s Secret Plan to Shut Off Cellphones and the Internet, Explained
Demeter
Dec 2013
#19
Former Top NSA Officials Insist Employees Are Leaving Because Obama Is Mean, Not Because They Object
Demeter
Dec 2013
#22
A bachelor's degree earns young men less in real terms than their counterparts made 40 years ago
Demeter
Dec 2013
#17
Big Banks About to Start Booking Second Mortgage Losses They Can No Longer Extend and Pretend Away
Demeter
Dec 2013
#21
NSA Defends Encryption Backdoors By Promising It's Only Used To Spy On All Of Us
Demeter
Dec 2013
#33
If We Did Not Share in the Prosperity, Why Should We Have to Share in the Sacrifice?Rev. Al Sharpton
Demeter
Dec 2013
#35
Washington Doesn't Have a Spending Problem. It Has a Health Care Problem. Period.
Demeter
Dec 2013
#41
Was CIA financier-turned Wall Street banker assassinated by the bearded bag lady?
Demeter
Dec 2013
#46
IT'S A SCANDAL: New Budget Agreement Doesn't Contain Extended Benefits For The Unemployed
xchrom
Dec 2013
#52
Crazy - No extension of unemploymnet, but restores billions from sequestor cuts
DemReadingDU
Dec 2013
#60