Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH, Wednesday, December 14, 2011 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)46. Don't 'Occupy the Democratic Party' -- Four Lessons From the Populist Movement
http://www.alternet.org/story/153354/don%27t_%27occupy_the_democratic_party%27_--_four_lessons_from_the_populist_movement?page=entire
...The public understands correctly that Wall Streets financial elites dominate politics. How else can we account for the fact that the financial sector was rewarded for gambling our economy into debt and killing 8 million jobs in a matter of months? At the same time, wages are stagnant, benefits are being cut right and left, public sector workers are under attack, and unemployment remains above 8 percent. No wonder Americans believe that both parties are beholden to the 1 percent.
To be sure, the 99 percent framework, so magnificently popularized by Occupy Wall Street, will be deployed by just about everyone to energize the base. Yet, were hearing arguments that Occupy Wall Street should occupy the Democratic Party...If Occupy Wall Street has anything at all to do with the 2012 elections, I hope it will organize large demonstrations at both conventions to dramatize the well-documented fact that both parties care more about financial elites than they do about the 99 percent. Of course there are worthy Democrats who have shown the gumption to take on Wall Street. But their power is muted as the Democratic Party overall defers to Wall Streets lobbyists and campaign funds...For over a generation, weve watched the Democratic Party move steadily to the right and increasingly accommodate the top 1 percent. (In case you have any lingering doubts, read Winner Take All Politics, by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson.) The Wall Street orgy of the last 30 years was built upon the deregulatory push initiated by Jimmy Carter and then accelerated by Bill Clinton. Wall Streetfriendly policies continue today, actualized by Obamas appointment of Tim Geithner as Treasury Secretary. Even after the enormous crash, born and bred on Wall Street, the needs of the financial elites still come first. The banks who caused the crash, we recently discovered, had access to $7.77 trillion in secret bailouts, while the real economy languished....Nevertheless, labor and progressive organizations see no other option save the Democrats. They believe its a fools errand even to consider a political alternative because, they argue, third parties always fail, sometimes miserably. (They feel particularly burned by Ralph Naders run, which they believe put G.W. Bush into office.)
So whats to be done? For starters, we should investigate carefully the last massive movement that explicitly challenged the one percent and that demanded a democratization of high finance the Populists of the late 1880s...This made-in-America movement grew out of the horrendous conditions faced by small farmers, especially in the South. In order to survive through the winter, farmers had to pledge their future crops to one dominant local merchant in exchange for food and supplies. The merchant (then called The Man) would charge outrageous interest rates, insuring that eventually farmers would have to sign over title to their land in order to settle their debts. As a result, thousands of independent farmers turned into impoverished sharecroppers. All the necessities of farming, from the grain elevators to farm implements to the railroads were run by monopolies that squeezed the farmers dry. To compound these problems, the U.S. money supply was limited to a fixed quantity of gold, as demanded by Wall Street. This insured that as the population grew, the money supply would remain fixed, leading to enormous downward pressures on farm prices. It was a continuous rural depression as black and white farmers drifted into peonage. (Will rising student loans do something similar to the next generation? Will all of us be indebted to a handful of Wall Street banks?)
...Out of these conditions grew the Peoples Party, one of the most powerful third party alternatives in U.S. history. But it didnt end well. In 1896 the Peoples Party was hijacked by a group of ambitious politicians who rammed through a fusion ticket behind the Democratic presidential nominee, William Jennings Bryan. That retreat, combined with Bryans defeat, alienated the farmer base within the National Farmers Alliance. With the failure to achieve political power, the cooperative movement was starved to death due to lack of credit and faded away. More and more small farmers lost their land and slipped into abject poverty as the elites tightened their grip on political power and held it, with few exceptions, until the New Deal. (See Lawrence Goodwins The Populist Moment for a definitive account.)
VARIOUS TENTATIVE IDEAS FOLLOW....A MUST-READ FOR THE 99%
...The public understands correctly that Wall Streets financial elites dominate politics. How else can we account for the fact that the financial sector was rewarded for gambling our economy into debt and killing 8 million jobs in a matter of months? At the same time, wages are stagnant, benefits are being cut right and left, public sector workers are under attack, and unemployment remains above 8 percent. No wonder Americans believe that both parties are beholden to the 1 percent.
To be sure, the 99 percent framework, so magnificently popularized by Occupy Wall Street, will be deployed by just about everyone to energize the base. Yet, were hearing arguments that Occupy Wall Street should occupy the Democratic Party...If Occupy Wall Street has anything at all to do with the 2012 elections, I hope it will organize large demonstrations at both conventions to dramatize the well-documented fact that both parties care more about financial elites than they do about the 99 percent. Of course there are worthy Democrats who have shown the gumption to take on Wall Street. But their power is muted as the Democratic Party overall defers to Wall Streets lobbyists and campaign funds...For over a generation, weve watched the Democratic Party move steadily to the right and increasingly accommodate the top 1 percent. (In case you have any lingering doubts, read Winner Take All Politics, by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson.) The Wall Street orgy of the last 30 years was built upon the deregulatory push initiated by Jimmy Carter and then accelerated by Bill Clinton. Wall Streetfriendly policies continue today, actualized by Obamas appointment of Tim Geithner as Treasury Secretary. Even after the enormous crash, born and bred on Wall Street, the needs of the financial elites still come first. The banks who caused the crash, we recently discovered, had access to $7.77 trillion in secret bailouts, while the real economy languished....Nevertheless, labor and progressive organizations see no other option save the Democrats. They believe its a fools errand even to consider a political alternative because, they argue, third parties always fail, sometimes miserably. (They feel particularly burned by Ralph Naders run, which they believe put G.W. Bush into office.)
So whats to be done? For starters, we should investigate carefully the last massive movement that explicitly challenged the one percent and that demanded a democratization of high finance the Populists of the late 1880s...This made-in-America movement grew out of the horrendous conditions faced by small farmers, especially in the South. In order to survive through the winter, farmers had to pledge their future crops to one dominant local merchant in exchange for food and supplies. The merchant (then called The Man) would charge outrageous interest rates, insuring that eventually farmers would have to sign over title to their land in order to settle their debts. As a result, thousands of independent farmers turned into impoverished sharecroppers. All the necessities of farming, from the grain elevators to farm implements to the railroads were run by monopolies that squeezed the farmers dry. To compound these problems, the U.S. money supply was limited to a fixed quantity of gold, as demanded by Wall Street. This insured that as the population grew, the money supply would remain fixed, leading to enormous downward pressures on farm prices. It was a continuous rural depression as black and white farmers drifted into peonage. (Will rising student loans do something similar to the next generation? Will all of us be indebted to a handful of Wall Street banks?)
...Out of these conditions grew the Peoples Party, one of the most powerful third party alternatives in U.S. history. But it didnt end well. In 1896 the Peoples Party was hijacked by a group of ambitious politicians who rammed through a fusion ticket behind the Democratic presidential nominee, William Jennings Bryan. That retreat, combined with Bryans defeat, alienated the farmer base within the National Farmers Alliance. With the failure to achieve political power, the cooperative movement was starved to death due to lack of credit and faded away. More and more small farmers lost their land and slipped into abject poverty as the elites tightened their grip on political power and held it, with few exceptions, until the New Deal. (See Lawrence Goodwins The Populist Moment for a definitive account.)
VARIOUS TENTATIVE IDEAS FOLLOW....A MUST-READ FOR THE 99%
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Management Gurus Claim They were Blindsided by Toxic Culture at Countrywide By Michael Hudson
Demeter
Dec 2011
#7
Why No Financial Crisis Prosecutions? Ex-Justice Official Says It’s Just too Hard By Marian Wang
Demeter
Dec 2011
#9
Notice How Subtly TIME Smears Occupation Movement with the Image of a Masked "Terrorist"
Demeter
Dec 2011
#36
Plus the not so subtle woman wearing a hajib lower in the scarf design of the main pic.
dixiegrrrrl
Dec 2011
#88
Secretive Millionaires Funding Online Primary For 'Independent' White House Run
Demeter
Dec 2011
#32
Stiglitz: US must invest massively in infrastructure, technology, and education
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#72
Detainment Camps Going Live: FEMA Seeking Subcontractors “Temporary Camp Services” In All 50 States
Demeter
Dec 2011
#69
"...across the entire United States..." What does it mean? Evenly distributed throughout all States
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#100
Why Is Eric Cantor Blocking the Congressional Insider Trading Act? By John Carney
Demeter
Dec 2011
#79
Last Week Americans Pulled The Most Money From Stock Market Since US Downgrade, Despite Market Surge
Demeter
Dec 2011
#80
Former Financial Advisor Gets 20 Years For Bilking Widows, Holocaust Survivors
Demeter
Dec 2011
#114