Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Bill Gates on 60 Minutes just now. [View all]Salviati
(6,008 posts)2. A hell of a lot more easily than carbon waste
That's for sure.
I believe that if you've got a new generation of reactors, that are designed from the ground up to be the backbone of an integrated power system, and not just an offshoot, or in support of a nuclear weapons program, then the issue of nuclear waste is reduced a lot, but I'm no expert, just remembering things that I've read over the years.
The important thing to consider though is that we're not comparing nuclear power to nothing, we're comparing it to the system that we've got right now, which is untenable and giving us diffuse problems that are very difficult to deal with. In comparison, dealing with point source, localized issues is a benefit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If we keep going as we are now carbon will cause cataclysmic human carnage. This from
c-rational
Feb 2021
#5
I agree on both counts - school privatization is a bad idea, not just poor, and wealth does not
c-rational
Feb 2021
#6
His false assertions regarding schools also don't make his assertions about energy false nt
Shermann
Feb 2021
#7
And the transcript plus. Warning: the "so-called renewable" energy haters won't like this.
progree
Feb 2021
#11
If I thought Bill Gates was oracular, it might disturb me. However I don't do...
NNadir
Feb 2021
#13
I forgot, what were the CO2 atmospheric concentrations at Mauna Loa when the first
progree
Feb 2021
#14
Solar and wind didn't become economically competiitve until a few years ago (with subsidies)
progree
Feb 2021
#16
So if we replace all fossil fuel and so-called renewable with nuclear at $12 Million/MW,
progree
Feb 2021
#20
A gigawatt for a system with 20-30% capacity utilization is not equivalent to a gigawatt...
NNadir
Feb 2021
#25
"A gigawatt for a system with 20-30% capacity utilization is not equivalent to a gigawatt...
progree
Feb 2021
#26
Maybe you should write to Bill Gates the reasons why so-called renewables have not worked,
progree
Feb 2021
#27
Too bad, he has a lot bigger megaphone and influence than you do, so not giving a shit about
progree
Feb 2021
#31
I am not talking about the ability to advertise. Trump had a great deal of influence as well.
NNadir
Feb 2021
#34
By your Mauna Loa criteria, the trillions spent on solar, wind, and nuclear have not even remotely
progree
Feb 2021
#39
Re: China's impressive statistics, neither of these are: 406 TWh wind, 330 TWh nuclear
progree
Feb 2021
#28
I remarked on them as energy. We obviously disagree mightily on how impressive less than 2 EJ...
NNadir
Feb 2021
#32
On reliability differences between nuclear and solar/wind, that's what I was advocating
progree
Feb 2021
#33
"We obviously disagree mightily" (sigh, here we go again, assuming I thinking something
progree
Feb 2021
#35