Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights
In reply to the discussion: Do Vegans Care More About Animals Than People? [View all]Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)23. I'm not wrong and you're not wrong. You are a prescripitivist and and I am a descriptivist.
I understand that distinction and you , apparently, do not. That does not make you an idiot, it makes you uniformed on matters of lexicography. And if calling me an idiot is your only defense, then you truly do not understand the distinction.
You define the word they way you insist it must be used by others, (prescriptive) and I define the word they way it is actually used by others (descriptive).
For either of us to call the other wrong is to confess ignorance of the overarching domain. And since you seem intimidated by my use of "many words" let me just quote wikipedia:
Linguistic prescription (or prescriptivism) is the practice of elevating one variety or manner of language use over another. (your preferred approach)
VS
In the study of language, description or descriptive linguistics is the work of objectively analyzing and describing how language is actually used (or how it was used in the past) by a group of people in a speech community.
All scholarly research in linguistics is descriptive; like all other sciences, its aim is to observe the linguistic world as it is, without the bias of preconceived ideas about how it ought to be. (my preferred approach)
Do you now understand my point? If you do, I am happy that I could help you. If you do not, then you're just being deliberately obtuse. Either way, I will not waste any more time on this pointless discussion since it was settled decades ago by the linguistic community, and there's no need for me to "settle" it again. It's settled science.
On edit: And why did I bother to respond at all? Because you said I "don't know shit" and that I'm "an idiot". You don't even know me, yet you feel comfortable hurling hurtful insults at me for no other reason than that you didn't understand my point. That, frankly, hurt my feelings (and if that makes you happy, well then congratulations on that marvelous accomplishment, You may be a vegan because you don't want to treat animals with cruelty, but you apparently have no difficulty treat fellow human beings with cruelty.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let me see. Miriam Webster, respected authority vs a complete stranger's own definition...
Binkie The Clown
Dec 2015
#13
Websters, and most of the other authorities are just saying: yes it is. n/t end of discussion.
Binkie The Clown
Dec 2015
#15
As the word was coined in living memory and the first printed usage is available, we know the answer
LeftyMom
Jan 2016
#18
I'm not wrong and you're not wrong. You are a prescripitivist and and I am a descriptivist.
Binkie The Clown
Jan 2016
#23
Yes. Done. You still don't get it, and I'm through trying to explain it to you. n/t
Binkie The Clown
Jan 2016
#25
I'm a vegan and I happily roasted a turkey for the Family Christmas gathering.
Binkie The Clown
Dec 2015
#17