Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
11. With the lax ownership/transfer laws currently on the books...... yes.... pretty meaningless!
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 11:33 PM
Jun 2013

But if we registered our guns, the Cubans might grab them when they invade in the "Red Dawn" scenario.

Or ............ is it the North Koreans now?

Gee! That's s surprise. Most guns are brought in from states with lax gun laws! rdharma Jun 2013 #1
That is precisely what the data do NOT show. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #3
Actually, if you paid a bit more attention you'd find that most guns were purchased in Massachussets S_B_Jackson Jun 2013 #17
"Factual accuracy is strictly optional for gun control advocates" friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #20
Just more flame bait!! CokeMachine Jun 2013 #26
You might want to get your eyes checked and re-read the chart. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #29
average is is over 14 years. gejohnston Jun 2013 #2
That's from time of original traceable source. rdharma Jun 2013 #4
that's the claim about gejohnston Jun 2013 #5
With no gun registration or private background checks in many cases....... rdharma Jun 2013 #8
*All* Massachusetts firearms sales have background checks- no private sales here. friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #21
Thats gonna leave a mark. N/T beevul Jun 2013 #22
It's gotta be tough fishing CokeMachine Jun 2013 #27
Oh, he just noodlin' around. Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #28
National average is 11.12 years (at bottom of charts) geckosfeet Jun 2013 #6
MA is 14 gejohnston Jun 2013 #7
Meaningless without a UNIVERSAL required record of transfer for tracing! nt rdharma Jun 2013 #9
The whole thing is pretty meaningless anyway gejohnston Jun 2013 #10
With the lax ownership/transfer laws currently on the books...... yes.... pretty meaningless! rdharma Jun 2013 #11
IIRC, the Soviets got them from 4473s gejohnston Jun 2013 #13
What a hokey bunch of BS that movie was! rdharma Jun 2013 #14
unless there was something stratigic about that town gejohnston Jun 2013 #15
Sorry! There was NOTHING believable in that crappy film. nt rdharma Jun 2013 #16
Aww come on gejohnston Jun 2013 #18
Be kind- they've got a lot of time on their hands now that school's out... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #19
That is one of the few things we can agree on. N/T GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #25
You realize the movie is intended as an anti-war piece, and the makers are probably pretty AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #30
Well. The ATF seems to think it means something. Not sure exactly what. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #12
Gee! That's s surprise. Most guns were brought in from MASS! ileus Jun 2013 #23
The case with all the state data that I have looked at so far. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #24
So much for the 'iron river' meme. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #31
The only state where that looks at all like it might be factor is NY. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Interesting ATF Firearms ...»Reply #11