Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Fill in the blank [View all]stone space
(6,498 posts)34. Huh? What rule? I merely observed that the right half of that chart was invalid.
Last edited Mon Oct 10, 2016, 02:36 PM - Edit history (1)
Do you really need rules to notice that?
Seriously???
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Huh? What rule? I merely observed that the right half of that chart was invalid.
stone space
Oct 2016
#34
I don't know anything about your rules, except that you appear obsessed with them.
stone space
Oct 2016
#42
The discussion may have no point, other than to spin in well-worn circles
struggle4progress
Oct 2016
#15
So your argument would be, then, that warring parts of the Bible shouldn't be taken literally.
Goblinmonger
Oct 2016
#11
If I tell you that I believe in the 1st Amendment's guarentee of Freedom of Religion, will you...
stone space
Oct 2016
#20
No, the challenge here is to explain why certain parts SHOULD be taken literally...
trotsky
Oct 2016
#7
What "rule" is required to believe that swords should be beaten into plowshares?
stone space
Oct 2016
#21
I do sometimes wonder if trolls have a special tendency to put words in the mouths of others
struggle4progress
Oct 2016
#14