Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Art Garfunkel Net Worth: 45 MILLION [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)85. Nope, that's why they have to manufacture smears.
And you're right, that's why she's sending her surrogates after Bernie, she's panicking.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So are the wealthy people who support Hillary, since she is proposing to raise taxes on the wealthy.
DanTex
Jan 2016
#65
You do understand the difference between Ben, Jerry and Jamie Dimond, don't you?
pangaia
Jan 2016
#114
There's also the difference that Ben and Jerry have never screwed over workers or entire countries
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#131
It's funny that you call Dimon Hillary's "bff." Just another example of how detached Bernie
DanTex
Jan 2016
#134
In your opinion. In Trump's opinion, supporting Trump is an act of pure goodness.
DanTex
Jan 2016
#149
Oh no! The Evil Ben and Jerry...I thiught Bernie was a commie who hates success
Armstead
Jan 2016
#97
Seems to be the yardstick when it comes to HRC supporters. Or Hillary herself, for that
DanTex
Jan 2016
#107
It's different if you support a candidate who backs the people instead of the rich.
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#117
Of course there is. Rich people who don't back Bernie get bashed, rich people who back Bernie
DanTex
Jan 2016
#132
hmmmmmm.... I know all the millionaires who support Bernie are just different
boston bean
Jan 2016
#3
Well, I guess I would need to know yours, cause everyone else but bernies millionaires seem to fall
boston bean
Jan 2016
#21
They are just the evil 1% enabling the establishment to keep screwing us over, right?
boston bean
Jan 2016
#28
Getting rich as a musician isn't the same as getting rich by exploiting people.
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#124
Being in Congress for how many years? Having your family work for you? Having your wife benefit?
KittyWampus
Jan 2016
#60
Art should give up 44 M of those earnings in taxes, is that what you are saying?
boston bean
Jan 2016
#43
Bernie is not against people making money, its about fairness. trash this tread is an easy one
litlbilly
Jan 2016
#44
I'm about to do that, based on the ridiculous nature of arguments from these posters...
MrMickeysMom
Jan 2016
#47
I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's
lunamagica
Jan 2016
#88
He earned it honestly with his own hard work and talent. What's the problem? nt.
polly7
Jan 2016
#61
What a crock. Fail. Wealth does not disqualify one for agreeing that there is income
libdem4life
Jan 2016
#82
Is he trying to get corporate or billionaire welfare, etc.? No of course not.n/t
Skwmom
Jan 2016
#93
You know, I'm getting very tired of Clinton supporters assuming we are complete morons.
jeff47
Jan 2016
#109
Bernie's distortions that all rich people are bad has come back to bite him.
Dawson Leery
Jan 2016
#127
Oh it is silly season for sure. Newsflash Boston Bean, Simon & Garfunkle ain't Goldman Sachs
bklyncowgirl
Jan 2016
#157