Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
88. I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jan 2016

Endorsements over anyone who endorses Sanders

Art Garfunkel Net Worth: 45 MILLION [View all] boston bean Jan 2016 OP
And his top supporters are uber-rich capitalists Ben and Jerry. DanTex Jan 2016 #1
I thought all successful people were evil oligarchs redstateblues Jan 2016 #4
You thought wrong. (n/t) SMC22307 Jan 2016 #75
The point is that these rich guys are volunteering to pay more taxes.... Human101948 Jan 2016 #53
So are the wealthy people who support Hillary, since she is proposing to raise taxes on the wealthy. DanTex Jan 2016 #65
not the hedge fund people Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #78
Soros is a hedge fund person. DanTex Jan 2016 #80
let's see the speeches she gave Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #83
I'll put you down for "no evidence". Not surprising. DanTex Jan 2016 #84
I will not support Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #91
The problem is that Hillary only says she's going to Unknown Beatle Mar 2016 #177
Ihave a simile hollysmom Jan 2016 #69
Exactly. +1,000,000 Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #147
"Volunteering to pay more taxes". Not so much. oasis Jan 2016 #152
So, you're against ice cream karynnj Jan 2016 #70
Umm, I was being ironic. I like ice cream. DanTex Jan 2016 #71
You do understand the difference between Ben, Jerry and Jamie Dimond, don't you? pangaia Jan 2016 #114
Well, there are a lot of differences. DanTex Jan 2016 #118
you are gonna need a ladder to get out of that rabbit hole questionseverything Jan 2016 #129
There's also the difference that Ben and Jerry have never screwed over workers or entire countries Ken Burch Jan 2016 #131
It's funny that you call Dimon Hillary's "bff." Just another example of how detached Bernie DanTex Jan 2016 #134
And did so out of pure goodness. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #138
Of course, because supporting Bernie is an act of "pure goodness." DanTex Jan 2016 #139
It is. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #143
In your opinion. In Trump's opinion, supporting Trump is an act of pure goodness. DanTex Jan 2016 #149
Trust me.. pangaia Jan 2016 #87
Oh no! The Evil Ben and Jerry...I thiught Bernie was a commie who hates success Armstead Jan 2016 #97
I think the term is "champagne socialist". DanTex Jan 2016 #99
I think the term is successful people who are also decent human beings Armstead Jan 2016 #102
So it's OK as long as they support Bernie. DanTex Jan 2016 #104
Your usual bullshit Armstead Jan 2016 #106
Seems to be the yardstick when it comes to HRC supporters. Or Hillary herself, for that DanTex Jan 2016 #107
Hillary is a decent human being Armstead Jan 2016 #111
It's different if you support a candidate who backs the people instead of the rich. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #117
You're talking about the GOP. Both Hillary and Bernie back the people. DanTex Jan 2016 #119
Why are you so obsessed with rehabbing rich folks who back HRC? Ken Burch Jan 2016 #121
Just pointing out hypocrisy. DanTex Jan 2016 #123
There is no hypocrisy. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #125
Of course there is. Rich people who don't back Bernie get bashed, rich people who back Bernie DanTex Jan 2016 #132
It's different when a rich person puts their self-interest second. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #126
if you are rich and support hc questionseverything Jan 2016 #133
Quite the opposite. Supporting Hillary means improving the healthcare system, DanTex Jan 2016 #136
the aca was pretty much exactly what hc campaigned on in 08 questionseverything Jan 2016 #156
If I won a lottery worth $200 million dollars, would I be SamKnause Jan 2016 #2
hmmmmmm.... I know all the millionaires who support Bernie are just different boston bean Jan 2016 #3
Hi. SamKnause Jan 2016 #9
Art Garfunkel didn't win the lottery.. Why are you asking me this? boston bean Jan 2016 #10
I want you to clarify what part of the establishment means to you. SamKnause Jan 2016 #16
Well, I guess I would need to know yours, cause everyone else but bernies millionaires seem to fall boston bean Jan 2016 #21
If you have political clout because of your wealth. SamKnause Jan 2016 #26
They are just the evil 1% enabling the establishment to keep screwing us over, right? boston bean Jan 2016 #28
wealthy people DO have political clout hfojvt Jan 2016 #154
Getting rich as a musician isn't the same as getting rich by exploiting people. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #124
yes, they become part of the establishment over time. MariaThinks Jan 2016 #94
Any idea what those ratio's are? MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #62
I would just say... quickesst Jan 2016 #8
You think lottery winners have access SamKnause Jan 2016 #13
Really? quickesst Jan 2016 #66
I guess I am naive. SamKnause Jan 2016 #74
I don't think you're the oddball out... quickesst Jan 2016 #158
What does that have to do with the OP? mcar Jan 2016 #11
They must have come up with this new meme at their morning meeting. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #31
This is what the newspaper looks like in the bottom of the bird cage. nt artislife Jan 2016 #145
Sigh. You are misinformed, uninformed or playing games. cali Jan 2016 #5
And here I thought I was talking the right lingo! nt boston bean Jan 2016 #6
Lingo? Lol. cali Jan 2016 #17
slingo??? boston bean Jan 2016 #19
Okay, now you seem intent on embarrassing yourself. Go to it. cali Jan 2016 #23
Thanks for your permission.. nt boston bean Jan 2016 #24
:-) Well said. riversedge Jan 2016 #27
Always. nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #48
All three, actually. Wilms Jan 2016 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #12
Hello ~ Stoolbend In_The_Wind Jan 2016 #108
Yep. RiverLover Jan 2016 #18
Coo coo ca choo Mrs Robinson Fumesucker Jan 2016 #14
Art Garfunkel = the establishment? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #15
They don't want to know the difference, scottie... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #54
Definitions mean nothing, it's truly bizarre. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #56
Being in Congress for how many years? Having your family work for you? Having your wife benefit? KittyWampus Jan 2016 #60
LMAO! I rest my case! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #63
........ polly7 Jan 2016 #73
#berniesotablishment he does his own laundry! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #76
They really don't have anything at all compelling against him, do they? polly7 Jan 2016 #81
Nope, that's why they have to manufacture smears. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #85
OK. Got it. Successful people who support HRC-Evil redstateblues Jan 2016 #159
This is what you've actually "got": beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #160
.......... boston bean Jan 2016 #77
Not like S&G run Bechtel Corp. or sell Junk Bonds. This meme is insipid leveymg Jan 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author leveymg Jan 2016 #22
deserves twice that for serving up the soundtrack of this campaign reddread Jan 2016 #25
Such a beautiful song... SMC22307 Jan 2016 #86
$45 M delivers the 1%'s newspapers and shines their shoes underpants Jan 2016 #29
$45M does that, huh? Are they hiring? DanTex Jan 2016 #68
This may not be the stupidest post I've ever seen but it's right up there tularetom Jan 2016 #30
I know... How could have I ever come to that conclusion! LOL boston bean Jan 2016 #32
Seriously. polly7 Jan 2016 #89
Despicable IGNORE - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #33
He's got a ways to go before matching Hillbot $200M Katy Perry. closeupready Jan 2016 #34
Thanks for this! LOL boston bean Jan 2016 #35
Well that's just poor compared to the Clintons. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #36
Ignorance is forgivable elias49 Jan 2016 #37
You're right! nt boston bean Jan 2016 #38
And to think we all fought Bush together. Gregorian Jan 2016 #39
Sniff. Is that smell desparation? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #40
I love the smell of flop sweat in the morning Fumesucker Jan 2016 #120
LOL Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #150
Oh, you didn't go there! ucrdem Jan 2016 #41
This is another demonstration of someone who has never listened... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #42
Art should give up 44 M of those earnings in taxes, is that what you are saying? boston bean Jan 2016 #43
Art should give $44 million to Hillary then? elias49 Jan 2016 #45
Why would you think I said THAT? MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #46
Is Art a member of the 1%? boston bean Jan 2016 #50
I don't think she gets it. polly7 Jan 2016 #72
I don't either, polly.... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #101
You're a good soul. polly7 Jan 2016 #105
Thanks, polly! MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #110
I could never serve as you did in any political or community leader position. polly7 Jan 2016 #122
Bernie is not against people making money, its about fairness. trash this tread is an easy one litlbilly Jan 2016 #44
I'm about to do that, based on the ridiculous nature of arguments from these posters... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #47
I hear ya. It just shows their desperation, they got nothing. litlbilly Jan 2016 #51
Actually, they DO.... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #57
He should only be licensing music from starving artists KingFlorez Jan 2016 #49
"Fools" said I, "you do not know, Silence like a cancer grows" Sunlei Jan 2016 #52
This is ridiculous karynnj Jan 2016 #55
Actually, not sad at all. boston bean Jan 2016 #58
I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's lunamagica Jan 2016 #88
If you do not understand the difference between Art Garfunkel and Jamie Dimon, pangaia Jan 2016 #59
^^^^^^ Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #79
+100 Armstead Jan 2016 #100
He earned it honestly with his own hard work and talent. What's the problem? nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #61
+1 (NT) Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #64
Stupid post. Here's what I think about that... ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2016 #67
What a crock. Fail. Wealth does not disqualify one for agreeing that there is income libdem4life Jan 2016 #82
SUCK OF THE DAY! Ron Green Jan 2016 #90
That's what he said. demmiblue Jan 2016 #96
Thanks for posting Gothmog Jan 2016 #92
Is he trying to get corporate or billionaire welfare, etc.? No of course not.n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #93
Paul Simon gives back in a very big real way karynnj Jan 2016 #95
Your distortions are astounding sometimes Armstead Jan 2016 #98
This is dumbest thing I've ever read whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #103
You know, I'm getting very tired of Clinton supporters assuming we are complete morons. jeff47 Jan 2016 #109
I'm actually coming to enjoy the desperation they exhibit Fumesucker Jan 2016 #142
I couldn't have said it Aerows Jan 2016 #164
+1 SixString Jan 2016 #170
So now we're throwing Artie under the bus? Ken Burch Jan 2016 #112
I guess this means tha Bernie is even making head roads into the top 1% awake Jan 2016 #113
Before Sanders' "America" ad, did you even know who Art Garfunkel was? SMC22307 Jan 2016 #115
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jan 2016 #116
Bernie's distortions that all rich people are bad has come back to bite him. Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #127
Put up or...... cali Jan 2016 #130
What a crock. Did you get that POS talking point in your daily email? nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #135
No, the distortions you express are right wing nonsense Armstead Jan 2016 #137
You do know that people in the poorest countries RoccoR5955 Jan 2016 #141
Man, some of you Hillbots are losing your fucking shit spectacularly. CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #128
^^^This. artislife Jan 2016 #148
Wait until Hillary loses a couple of actual primaries Fumesucker Jan 2016 #162
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #140
Sunday morning funnies? artislife Jan 2016 #144
identical to right wing attacks Roy Ellefson Jan 2016 #146
Wow no wonder he is a Bernie supporter! workinclasszero Jan 2016 #151
Remember "The Mummy" when the scientist goes mad and laughs closeupready Jan 2016 #153
Just Wow Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #155
Oh it is silly season for sure. Newsflash Boston Bean, Simon & Garfunkle ain't Goldman Sachs bklyncowgirl Jan 2016 #157
Paul Simon is worth considerably more, why go after Art? Juicy_Bellows Jan 2016 #161
LMAO! This is hilarious! R B Garr Jan 2016 #163
This is better than any comedy routine. Bonobo Jan 2016 #165
LOL! Is the latest: smearing Art Garfunkell??? Bernblu Jan 2016 #166
SIMON AND GARFUNKEL GO UNDER THE BUS! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #169
THAT'S NOT AT ALL WHAT THIS IS SAYING R B Garr Jan 2016 #176
Demi Lovato net worth: 20 Million Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #167
45 million isn't one percent. Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #168
I think that moniker for the billionaires has a %# at less than .001 nolabels Jan 2016 #171
Some families are worth trillions. Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #173
Well maybe you might get some scared enough to run from it but that does not solve the problem nolabels Jan 2016 #175
It's true. Garfunkel has special access to the Sanders campaign... Orsino Jan 2016 #172
The Clinton's net worth - $111 million wavesofeuphoria Jan 2016 #174
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Art Garfunkel Net Worth: ...»Reply #88