Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
And, I voted for him for much the same reason I'll vote for Bernie. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #1
"If only McGovern had been more like Nixon" is the unstated "lesson" here. arcane1 Feb 2016 #5
Totally absurd. Also, More than half the people who voted in that election are fuckin dead leftupnorth Feb 2016 #67
McGovern's VP pick had Bipolar, underwent Electroshock. McGovern downplayed, Nixon Attacked! nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #117
Nixon coveted the white house for years, above all-to the point where it clouded his judgment badly. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #134
I volunteered for McGovern. earthside Feb 2016 #87
Nixon attacked McGovern: Called crazy while VP choice underwent Electroshock for Bipolar! TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #115
If we are stupid enough to assume history always repeats: Clinton lost once, thus she'll lose again. arcane1 Feb 2016 #2
Clinton lost by less than half a percentage point. McGovern lost by 49 states. n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #4
I'm referring to 2008 n/t arcane1 Feb 2016 #9
Hillary lost to Obama in the overall primary by less than a half percent of voters. n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #24
Point is, she lost. Your history lesson is irrelevant. n/t arcane1 Feb 2016 #34
And? A loss is a loss. frylock Feb 2016 #40
Bernie has had MANY losses in his career. So? The conservative super pacs pnwmom Feb 2016 #99
What's your fucking point? frylock Feb 2016 #100
What's yours? pnwmom Feb 2016 #101
You're living in the past and allowing fear to rule your life. frylock Feb 2016 #103
Fry, cut it out. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #121
Step off. frylock Feb 2016 #131
It was heart breaking. That was the first Presidential livetohike Feb 2016 #3
I was at the McGovern convention (college press pass). kstewart33 Feb 2016 #122
How much do you make? n/t Wilms Feb 2016 #6
How does that affect what is right or wrong? scscholar Feb 2016 #31
Hoarding? vdogg Feb 2016 #80
so spending one's money is fine, saving is not . . . got it DrDan Feb 2016 #94
Hey Pnwmom, it is 2016 NOT 1972. Different Context!! m-lekktor Feb 2016 #7
Tax hikes have recently come into fashion. Who knew? oasis Feb 2016 #18
Methods and the medium for defeating propaganda have changed. frylock Feb 2016 #43
"Propaganda". Would that include promises of free stuff? oasis Feb 2016 #61
Yes, "promises of free stuff" is a perfect example of the propaganda that is getting it's ass kicked frylock Feb 2016 #69
Nobody is promising free stuff. That's another lie. arcane1 Feb 2016 #75
Bernie NEVER uttered the words "free college" or "free health care"? oasis Feb 2016 #138
If he's hiking taxes then he's not promising free stuff. bunnies Feb 2016 #105
My memory is kind of fuzzy. Was it McGovern's campaign oasis Feb 2016 #109
I wouldn't know. That was before I was born. nt bunnies Feb 2016 #137
Tax hikes on the Uber Rich are only "unpopular" whathehell Feb 2016 #45
You should have been there. The contexts were very similar. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #123
Today's meme is "Taxes". Pass it on! beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #8
Yes. The aspens sure are turning in unison, aren't they? Arugula Latte Feb 2016 #93
This McGovern meme is bullshit! His VP pick had Bipolar, He downplayed it & Nixon attacked! nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #118
It wasn't bipolar disorder at all. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #124
Later it was identified to be Bipolar-II disorder. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #127
Redistribution of income? Mortgage Interest Deduction, anyone? closeupready Feb 2016 #10
No We Can't! Ron Green Feb 2016 #11
That was a different time. Vinca Feb 2016 #12
Good thing Bernie isn't running on that platform Paulie Feb 2016 #13
DU needs an enthusiasm award Fumesucker Feb 2016 #14
In 1972 I was wearing diapers. EmperorHasNoClothes Feb 2016 #15
Yes times do change. PotatoChip Feb 2016 #53
History has this nasty habit of repeating itself. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #125
Yes we must always run on Republican policies because 45 years ago a Democrat lost an election Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #16
I know, right? It's such fucking bullshit that I could scream. Nay Feb 2016 #108
It's called learning from experience. nt kstewart33 Feb 2016 #126
And Hillary is calling for the continued, or at least the codified, redistribution of wealth upward Schema Thing Feb 2016 #17
This may come as a shock to you, but things have changed radically cali Feb 2016 #19
Much like Hillary, this post is living in the past. nt Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #20
McGovern never called himself a Socialist, on camera, repeatedly. onehandle Feb 2016 #21
After saying he backed Eagleton "1,000 per cent" and then throwing him under the bus? Puh-leeze. Had KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #36
You're right! We should be just like Republicans and demand lower taxes! LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #22
You know, for the middle class, that's actually a great idea. nt kstewart33 Feb 2016 #128
More right-wing talking points disguised as "concern"... AOR Feb 2016 #23
"Settle For Hillary!!" AzDar Feb 2016 #25
Different times NowSam Feb 2016 #26
Do we have any stats SheenaR Feb 2016 #27
Richard Nixon meets all three of your criteria and he beat McGovern by 49 states. pnwmom Feb 2016 #32
Message received: McGovern should've been more right-wing like Nixon. arcane1 Feb 2016 #47
Incorrect SheenaR Feb 2016 #49
yep Roy Ellefson Feb 2016 #72
And Nixon cheated. earthside Feb 2016 #88
Nixon had high favorability at that juncture, China and all that.... Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #81
Yet FDR won so many reelections they had to move mmonk Feb 2016 #28
Income hadn't been redistributed upward for 30 years before McGovern JHB Feb 2016 #29
That was then, this is now. Autumn Feb 2016 #30
A good does of REALITY is always a good thing. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #33
It's not 1972 Kall Feb 2016 #35
*yawn* frylock Feb 2016 #37
Hillary Clinton was against gay marriage and has lost the millennial vote pinebox Feb 2016 #38
Ancient history. DinahMoeHum Feb 2016 #39
...and we're all fucked now because he wasn't elected. cyberswede Feb 2016 #41
If it's truly going to be Trump vs Sanders flamingdem Feb 2016 #42
If Trump is a Dem plant or just a guy who really wants to fuck things Nay Feb 2016 #110
McGovern was correct... Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #44
Do you mean Mondale? - nt KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #48
Yes! Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #51
Guaranteed Annual Income -- an idea whose time has come and which is long overdue, imo. Just KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #46
Different times. TheFarseer Feb 2016 #50
My father-in-law said that was a nightmare Iliyah Feb 2016 #52
It's the year 2016. retrowire Feb 2016 #54
THE issue in 1972 was the Vietnam War. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #55
It was different times, Nixon had a similar tax credit called Family Assistance Program which was Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #76
You realize that EVERY GOVERNMENT is about "redistribution of income", bullwinkle428 Feb 2016 #56
Nope, I don't buy that. 44 years ago, when McGovern ran, PatrickforO Feb 2016 #57
Pssst it's not the 60s anymore, the Cold War is over gyroscope Feb 2016 #58
George McGovern didn't have THE INTERNET. nt valerief Feb 2016 #59
This current awakening is fresher, and runs deeper & broader than 1972 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #60
Yeah, and how did that work out for you? tularetom Feb 2016 #62
That was then, this is now. leftupnorth Feb 2016 #63
Abraham Lincoln lost all of the southern states in 1860 election Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #64
Hrmm...let me check my calendar.....nope! It isn't 1972. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #65
Definitely a far different situation.... NiteOwl1 Feb 2016 #66
Did you just find out about that? I remember it from my childhood! It was about Vietnam and not Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #68
Thanks for your incremental fear. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #70
Different time, different electorate. Avalux Feb 2016 #71
So what...this isn't 1972. Punkingal Feb 2016 #73
In 1970 there was not social media jillan Feb 2016 #74
That was then. This is now. Hiraeth Feb 2016 #77
In 1972, I was 2. nt ScreamingMeemie Feb 2016 #78
The way forward is clear HassleCat Feb 2016 #79
I volunteered for and work on the McGovern campaign Gothmog Feb 2016 #82
They do indeed. Thanks. n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #83
Nevertheless, they are still irrelevant. longship Feb 2016 #97
And how many times have we heard Bernie say pnwmom Feb 2016 #98
Nevertheless, your historic argument is a non-sequitur. longship Feb 2016 #102
I remember that ad! kstewart33 Feb 2016 #132
Wow. It's almost like BS is trying to EMULATE McGovern. tarheelsunc Feb 2016 #142
It really looks that way Gothmog Feb 2016 #146
And that was a different era The Traveler Feb 2016 #84
McGovern lost because H2O Man Feb 2016 #85
Typical Hillarian ... living in the past. earthside Feb 2016 #86
Sanders polls very well against any of the slugs he would possibly face in the general. Orsino Feb 2016 #89
Bernie Sanders says he polls better against GOP candidates than Hillary Clinton Gothmog Feb 2016 #116
Goldwater strongly called for tax cuts - and lost states 44 to 6. ieoeja Feb 2016 #90
Ooh noes! Socialism!!! 1111!!! Fearless Feb 2016 #91
You do realize that several decades have passed since McGovern? Arugula Latte Feb 2016 #92
Yeah. Because electroshock therapy, Thorazine, and Thomas Eagleton had nothing to do with the loss. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #95
The campaign of McGovern and Sanders cannot be compared as easily as that Jack Rabbit Feb 2016 #96
When did taxes become redistribution of wealth? Dretownblues Feb 2016 #104
By contrast - Reagan and Bush actually redistributed the income upward to the wealthy. They won. EndElectoral Feb 2016 #106
"More than half of our states have Republican governors and most of them rejected free Federal... bettyellen Feb 2016 #107
1972 as many others have stated. More than 40 years ago Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #111
Poor Hillary supporters, grasping at straws! AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #112
Is it just possible that things have changed in 40 years? LoveIsNow Feb 2016 #113
lol 44 years ago during the Cold War and far more promising times azurnoir Feb 2016 #114
Did I go through a time warp and wake up in 1972? Odin2005 Feb 2016 #119
If the same electorate were voting today, Bernie would not stand a chance, either. DaveT Feb 2016 #120
But after free trade and the rise of the service economy.... tokenlib Feb 2016 #129
it didn't help McGovern that his original running mate had seizures 0rganism Feb 2016 #130
Boomers need to move on, already. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #133
If the election had been held 2 years later, it would have been close to 49 states the other way jfern Feb 2016 #135
George is not Bernie so don't try to conflate the two. OK madokie Feb 2016 #136
Half the electorate from back then is now dead. Half of today's electorate hadn't yet been born. Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #139
We just have to win once. nt bemildred Feb 2016 #140
Republicans don't have a Nixon or Reagan to run against us. Plus, times change. (nt) thesquanderer Feb 2016 #141
Well, that certainly is proof that we should give up and let the rich have it all then. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #143
And McGovern was a WW2 vet, not a conscientious objector who doesn't follow Persondem Feb 2016 #144
2016 is NOT 1972, but it could turn into 1968... John Poet Feb 2016 #145
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»George McGovern strongly ...»Reply #18