2016 Postmortem

Logical

(22,457 posts)

1. Didn't read it but just more whining I assume form Hillary fans. nt

Reply to msanthrope (Original post)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 09:24 AM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie paid his family out of campaign funds, Hillary did not. [View all] msanthrope Mar 2016 OP

Didn't read it but just more whining I assume form Hillary fans. nt Logical Mar 2016 #1

Oh...no whining. I appreciate being introduced to a new source. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #2

Seriously, you didn't see the breathless thread that claimed Clinton used a campaign slush fund? randome Mar 2016 #3

I think Skinner's post about the OP, and the recs it got, says it all.... msanthrope Mar 2016 #11

Awful. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #4

And you know what? Never would have known HALF of this without that original msanthrope Mar 2016 #5

Just To be clear ... these are not ordinary "in-kind" donations that ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #6

No--Skinner kindly went on to explain that the inkind donations msanthrope Mar 2016 #8

Well then ... this IS concerning ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #13

Wow . . . you sure are convincing me to vote for Hillary . . . NOT. Vinca Mar 2016 #7

Not my job. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #9

Seriously? If I ever run for office, please promise not to support me. Vinca Mar 2016 #15

Look....if the words "President Trump" don't motivate you to the polling booth, what msanthrope Mar 2016 #18

President Sanders motivates me Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #23

That's the only thing that motivates me Steve. Fear just doesn't work. Autumn Mar 2016 #48

Are you asking me to vote for Jill Stein? nt artislife Mar 2016 #49

Faculty politics 1939 Mar 2016 #10

I was surprised to read that Jane Sanders did not support instituting tenure. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #12

. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #14

Many thanks to the jury!!!! nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #16

I didn't even notice the FreeBeacon link until now! That is awesome karma! randome Mar 2016 #20

Yes...I thank the original OP for giving us such a great source. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #31

LOL! Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #39

You did a good job of bamboozling Armstead Mar 2016 #43

you think the jury was bamboozled? msanthrope Mar 2016 #45

Juror #1 gets it. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #28

whow. just whow. At least the riversedge Mar 2016 #33

Interesting what real information that other op brought us here. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #17

That OP was very helpful in providing loads and loads of links. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #19

The difference that you fail to see in your eager effort retrowire Mar 2016 #21

I would think the main point of the OP is to conclusively cancel out the original OP. randome Mar 2016 #24

i thought Skinner's rebuttal did that sooo.. retrowire Mar 2016 #26

Obviously some didn't bother -or chose to ignore- those parts of the thread. randome Mar 2016 #41

Sander's family officially work for the campaign... retrowire Mar 2016 #44

What was the point of the original thread if not a poor attempt to trash Clinton? randome Mar 2016 #50

well, it clearly was that. and it was disproved. so? nt retrowire Mar 2016 #51

Bernie pays his interns, Hillary does not Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #22

Bravo/a ejbr Mar 2016 #25

Well done mcar Mar 2016 #27

Bill Clinton, anyone? Barack_America Mar 2016 #29

I know, right? There seems to be quite the blind spot there. djean111 Mar 2016 #37

Who cares? Seriously.....who cares msanthrope Mar 2016 #46

The same people who expect us to care about old stuff about Bernie and Jane? djean111 Mar 2016 #47

Everything I wrote about is this century. Bill's dalliances? msanthrope Mar 2016 #59

Maybe they don't matter to you. That's cool. djean111 Mar 2016 #61

I don't give a crap about sex acts between adults. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #63

That's fine. I don't either. djean111 Mar 2016 #65

OFFS.....people lie about their affairs. It's what they do. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #66

This issue doesn't bother me for either candidate actually Arazi Mar 2016 #30

"FEC regulations and campaign accounting." wyldwolf Mar 2016 #32

Math is Hard. After Lousiana, though, I expect exploding heads. msanthrope Mar 2016 #34

Seriously, math is hard. And there are other electoral concepts that are difficult... wyldwolf Mar 2016 #36

Don't care for these tit-for-tat posts Dem2 Mar 2016 #35

Your other thread got locked UglyGreed Mar 2016 #38

If one accepts the premise that payments through a campaign fund are unethical... randome Mar 2016 #40

Paying people to work is UglyGreed Mar 2016 #42

BTW Hillary's family gets UglyGreed Mar 2016 #52

According to reliable sources she has paid herself $250.000 . nt ladjf Mar 2016 #53

Didn't you read kydo Mar 2016 #54

I read all of that but couldn't tell which was which. ladjf Mar 2016 #57

Good for her for being able to make money kydo Mar 2016 #58

The Daily Caller? I'm not surprised. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #56

Glass houses and all. bettyellen Mar 2016 #55

Yes.... all from one source. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #60

Actually....it's a number of sources flowing from that one rag. And since you rec'd msanthrope Mar 2016 #62

Typical MaggieD Mar 2016 #64

k&r DesertRat Mar 2016 #67

Things that make you go Hmmmmm. Thanks for keeping up! Hekate Mar 2016 #68

always. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #70

Like Trump's supporters it doesn't matter what is said or proven...supporters for both HRC and BS Jitter65 Mar 2016 #69

K&R, something fishy in the Sanders campaign itsrobert Mar 2016 #71

Would never have known it, but for a BS supporter providing the link. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #72