If there was something bad ... (Reply #2)

In the discussion thread: Do Hillary supporters think the transcripts would look bad or think she said nothing bad? [View all]

Response to Logical (Original post)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:38 PM

surrealAmerican (11,174 posts)

2. If there was something bad ...

... it is almost certain to be leaked by somebody at some point during this campaign.

There could well be somebody with a recording, or at least notes, waiting for the right moment or the right buyer.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

48 replies	Author	Time	Post
Do Hillary supporters think the transcripts would look bad or think she said nothing bad? [View all]	Logical	Mar 2016	OP
they don't care, as long as she wins. nt	Viva_La_Revolution	Mar 2016	#1
Small correction. They don't care so long as sanders loses	Scootaloo	Mar 2016	#40
Just like Bernie supporters don't care that he wasn't even a dem for 30+ years. nt	BreakfastClub	Mar 2016	#43
If there was something bad ...	surrealAmerican	Mar 2016	#2
Desperation-grasping at straws. Maybe somebody can get Gowdy to hold hearings	redstateblues	Mar 2016	#10
This is very unlikely anything illegal.	surrealAmerican	Mar 2016	#14
they probably have bad content; but the really bad is just staggeringly large speaking fees she has	amborin	Mar 2016	#3
reeking of quid pro quo and actual proof	redstateblues	Mar 2016	#7
there's also proof in some cases and in other cases, it's just a matter of research; lo info voters	amborin	Mar 2016	#12
Ah the old BSS condescension.	redstateblues	Mar 2016	#31
Robert Reich gets up to $100,000 per speech as does Jimmy Carter	KittyWampus	Mar 2016	#29
Saying Glass Steagall isn't needed speaks volumes already. The too big to fail keep getting bigger..	think	Mar 2016	#4
Oh I'm sure they have incriminating stuff in them. ..Mika on Joe S. said she knew a	bkkyosemite	Mar 2016	#5
They know it's bad	Politicalboi	Mar 2016	#6
I always give her the benefit of the doubt	rock	Mar 2016	#8
She should release them if Trump releases his tax returns	Onlooker	Mar 2016	#9
It's a witchhunt.I think the usual Hillary Haters would find a scandal in her 1st grade report card.	Lil Missy	Mar 2016	#11
I think the haters would do the same thing they always do	MaggieD	Mar 2016	#13
.	cherokeeprogressive	Mar 2016	#17
I think it would be wildly distorted	hill2016	Mar 2016	#15
Hold crap-puddles, people are still going on about transcripts?	Tarc	Mar 2016	#16
An HRC Goldman-Sachs speech transcript has finally been leaked …	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#18
Nan, you know she said some embarrassing stuff. Nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#21
So tell us all what it was. n/t	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#23
If she's not worried no downside to proving me wrong. Nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#26
Would there be any "downside" ...	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#30
Email?? What does that have to do with her speeches? nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#33
Well, I don't know what insidious things ...	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#38
That is maybe the silliest response I've ever seen....	Logical	Mar 2016	#42
How do YOU know ...	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#45
Let's get the transcript of Jane Sanders meeting with Arpaio	KittyWampus	Mar 2016	#32
Wow, that is terrible! Nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#34
Oh no!! The dreaded transcripts	cosmicone	Mar 2016	#19
It's HARASSMENT. Nothing more. She has zero reason to release any transcripts.	KittyWampus	Mar 2016	#20
Like romneys tax returns? Lol! Nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#22
Her speeches are her intellectual property. NOTHING like tax returns which are public knowledge.	KittyWampus	Mar 2016	#25
Lol, no, my tax return is not public knowledge! Nice try! Nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#27
Not even the same ballpark. And I'm sure Hillary put her speaking fees	KittyWampus	Mar 2016	#36
The speeches would expose her! She knows that! Nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#37
Posting your personal emails ...	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#39
If someone paid me millions of dollars, I'd happily post every	kas125	Mar 2016	#47
Actually ...	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#48
It's less than harassment.	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#24
Lol, harassment? Who is yelling it at her? nt	Logical	Mar 2016	#28
Harassment equals being yelled at? Since when? n/t	NanceGreggs	Mar 2016	#35
Well, we know that after voting and advocating to destroy iraq...	Scootaloo	Mar 2016	#41
She's been under federal investigation for what, 24 years? And running for the last 16?	ucrdem	Mar 2016	#44
If she said something to affirm being in Wall Street's pocket . . .	Chichiri	Mar 2016	#46

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.