2016 Postmortem

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)

39. I have to disagree, in that Hillary has more delegates

Wed May 18, 2016, 07:56 PM

May 2016

She can almost certainly win at this point. Are you saying that there has been cheating the whole way through? There might have been, and some evidence exists, but not enough to make the claim decisively.

What's interesting is that, even though she has been winning, they had to pull all that shit in NV. That very much seems like it could really piss off a ot of people and further damage her chances in the GE. It almost seems like an emotional reaction to people who don't support her, as in, how dare they?!

That, more than anything, raises a lot of red flags as to Hillary's suitability to be president.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I believe the clearest explanation for the Clinton campaign's actions in NV and the ratfucking of [View all] Vincardog May 2016 OP

Why would they think they can't win? Have you looked at the delegate count? YouDig May 2016 #1

nice for a laugh. it was the sanders crowd doing all the dirty deeds the other day nt msongs May 2016 #2

Were you there? merrily May 2016 #27

Sigh. Skinner May 2016 #3

+1000. Metric System May 2016 #38

I believe that the clearest explanation for the Sanderss campaigns actions in NV and the ratfucking Fresh_Start May 2016 #4

The credentials committee kept 64 Bernie delegates out to give HRC a 30 delegate lead CHEATING Vincardog May 2016 #14

wrong: they kept 58 sanders delegates and 8? clinton delegates out Fresh_Start May 2016 #21

The rules in place since 2012 allowed delegates to challenge why they were denied. The chair denied Vincardog May 2016 #23

no, the chair did not deny them the right to challenge Fresh_Start May 2016 #26

You are entitled to your opinion not your own facts. Fact is they stole it for HRC on tape. Get Vincardog May 2016 #29

The fact is that Clinton won Nevada in February... Fresh_Start May 2016 #33

Maybe Bernie is just losing Renew Deal May 2016 #5

Kick for truth. They have been doing so during The Great Coast to Coast silvershadow May 2016 #6

Well I don't care who "wins" the nomination nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #7

lolz obamanut2012 May 2016 #10

I agree with you, it is hilarious nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #11

Sure you don't... SidDithers May 2016 #32

So who did you vote in your elections? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34

I voted for John Oliver...nt SidDithers May 2016 #35

I guess our friends from the UK nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #37

Once again displaying the expert research skills... SidDithers May 2016 #41

Your "explicantion" (SIC) is full baseless conspiracy theories. PeaceNikki May 2016 #8

You explain why they are hating on the left. Vincardog May 2016 #16

Uuummm... I'm not. PeaceNikki May 2016 #18

So your reply is baseless opinion. I am good with that. Vincardog May 2016 #20

Your OP is baseless conspiracy theory. That's a fact. There's no evidence of fraud. PeaceNikki May 2016 #24

Watch the video. Appologize to me after. Thank you Vincardog May 2016 #25

There's no video in your OP. PeaceNikki May 2016 #28

Thanks for the OP! obamanut2012 May 2016 #9

Your welcome Vincardog May 2016 #17

You are very concerned. Dem2 May 2016 #12

I echo Skinner's sigh. Starry Messenger May 2016 #13

"They have decided that they can not win." TwilightZone May 2016 #15

yes, how could Clinton possibly win 270 delegates ahead with six states to go alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #19

Yes you are totally right. Now please go see a therapist before you hurt someone. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #22

Look it's not rocket science, it -IS- Shock Doctrine...they need an enemy on the LEFT HereSince1628 May 2016 #30

BINGO nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #36

Oy BeyondGeography May 2016 #31

I have to disagree, in that Hillary has more delegates mindwalker_i May 2016 #39

Hillary is too much like Nixon, can't help herself? All in it together May 2016 #40