Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(53,027 posts)
75. I have had it with this language of going back, taking back
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 02:14 AM
Nov 2016

reverting in time. That isn't progressive, it's regressive. What is this core philosophy you think existed in the past? When? Was it during the FDR administration when the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow and Japanese internment camps? During the Cold War? Maybe the party of slavery? Are those the traditional "values."

What exactly about Clinton's platform did you find so objectionable? I get that empty slogans are all the rage, but if you all are going to keep going on reclaiming the glory days of the party, we have a right to know exactly when you want to return to, and whose rights you think we should do away with to make that happen.

There is no ideal past. There is a racist, exclusionary past. Hillary didn't run on a Third Way campaign. We are not in the 90s when the Third Way emerged so Democrats might have a hope of winning the presidency.

How is that few of you who use these ahistorical tropes can actually articulate a policy position or value you uphold?
If you mean to communicate something other than the Democratic party should serve white men to the exclusion of everyone else, you need to find a way to articulate some sort of idea rather than a nostalgia to return to the past. That is what Trump ran on.

By the way, 1/3 of those who voted for Bernie in the Democratic Primary in W Virginia said they were going to support Trump in the general election. They sought to ratfuck the primaries. Most or all of the Bernie anointed candidates lost in the general election, and most of them by margins wider than Clinton. You may think if the party were like what the college kids wanted we would win, yet there is absolutely no evidence to support it.

We still get to vote, and I sure as hell am not voting for anyone who talks about returning to the past.

I woulds have agreed with you except for the 2016 campaign. napi21 Nov 2016 #1
He was rejected malaise Nov 2016 #2
So you don't like Bernies approach to politics nore Hillary. JustW do you think napi21 Nov 2016 #3
Of course I like Bernie's economic policies malaise Nov 2016 #5
The problem started when too many of our politicians started taking Wall Street and big corporate Dustlawyer Nov 2016 #27
And the same is true everywhere malaise Nov 2016 #29
Of course, Reagan destroyed the unions WhiteTara Nov 2016 #36
Barney Frank took Wall Street money to win, and then wrote "Dodd-Frank" (nt) ehrnst Nov 2016 #57
Bernie's approach to politics? leftofcool Nov 2016 #37
he started at 15, then 12 now 10, he will get 25 cents raise Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #43
So where would we end up Uponthegears Nov 2016 #55
It's not as though we'd have won more votes by keeping it down to 12. Ken Burch Nov 2016 #79
No he wasn't oberliner Nov 2016 #94
I dont agree with your premise VMA131Marine Nov 2016 #4
If that's the problem marylandblue Nov 2016 #6
Nothing seems to appeal to them more than racist dog whistles. VMA131Marine Nov 2016 #8
They aren't very progressive people treestar Nov 2016 #31
1! AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #62
Yes, this is the problem. LisaM Nov 2016 #24
Agree, Dems should double down on a metro strategy, IMO radius777 Nov 2016 #87
Yep. Lunabell Nov 2016 #7
Jesus, the way some people talk you would think there wasn't one working class person boston bean Nov 2016 #9
Interesting how some people talk like AA and Latinos and women are not the working class. SunSeeker Nov 2016 #28
Don't you know by now that only white people work? leftofcool Nov 2016 #38
"Working class" was the biggest dog whistle this election season. Nt Quayblue Nov 2016 #60
i'm so tired of blaming the democratic party. DesertFlower Nov 2016 #10
I haven't examined the data myself but folks in the media said that malaise Nov 2016 #11
i've heard that too, but can't imagine it DesertFlower Nov 2016 #12
The sexism makes all the difference Zing Zing Zingbah Nov 2016 #15
I know a lot of these people treestar Nov 2016 #33
I don't think but a fraction believed they were voting "for" racism. DirkGently Nov 2016 #19
they voted for a blatant racist and sexist and they support him. bettyellen Nov 2016 #61
No one has anything in common with Hillary, either. DirkGently Nov 2016 #67
Your sexism is duly noted. Why am I not surprised you are a man? n/t duffyduff Nov 2016 #68
I certainly do! Many working women and gay men can relate.... bettyellen Nov 2016 #74
I think the media is confusing overlapping constituencies of who were the "voters" BumRushDaShow Nov 2016 #21
millions did... Macomb County MI is a perfect example Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #53
It's the triad of hate: racism, sexism, and homophobia n/t Zing Zing Zingbah Nov 2016 #13
exactly. i thought when DesertFlower Nov 2016 #14
Whites voted for Trump in the same numbers they did for Romney. DirkGently Nov 2016 #16
Years of looking at a black president simmered in those groups and was fed by Trump. ehrnst Nov 2016 #20
here's an interesting article. DesertFlower Nov 2016 #23
It is also about celebrity worship. That's how Arnold became governor of California. nt tblue37 Nov 2016 #45
arnold was sane and rational. trump DesertFlower Nov 2016 #46
Seconded. Principles matter. DirkGently Nov 2016 #17
Well said malaise Nov 2016 #30
I agree with this. closeupready Nov 2016 #83
Hmm. You mean abandon the coalitions that have made Democrats stray from the real reason we formed? ehrnst Nov 2016 #18
WOW. Progressivism equals "white male concerns?" DirkGently Nov 2016 #22
I keep hearing that we need to get back to "progressive" principles ehrnst Nov 2016 #25
Exactly! Thank you! boston bean Nov 2016 #32
Economic issues are universal. "Centrists" are not progressives. DirkGently Nov 2016 #34
When "true progressive" comes at the expense of Reproductive health, and LGBTQ rights ehrnst Nov 2016 #56
Ridiculous. Economic and social issues are not in competition. DirkGently Nov 2016 #65
1 progressoid Nov 2016 #82
1 jack_krass Nov 2016 #88
Precisely malaise Nov 2016 #26
Holy crap where does this come from? DirkGently Nov 2016 #35
It's the Michael Moore naive belief we need to reach these white dudes. duffyduff Nov 2016 #64
Cultural and economic progress aren't mutually exclusive. DirkGently Nov 2016 #66
Let me guess--you voted for Sanders. duffyduff Nov 2016 #69
Who in the world are you replying to? DirkGently Nov 2016 #86
Did You Know ColoradoCare Failed otohara Nov 2016 #84
Thank You Kathy M Nov 2016 #89
So we need a purge? yeah that will help... Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #39
I believe the OP is talking policies, not people. DirkGently Nov 2016 #40
More b.s. You don't have a clue what happened. duffyduff Nov 2016 #41
Face this one fact malaise Nov 2016 #47
EC is what counts to win election . Kathy M Nov 2016 #90
Agree 1000% hueymahl Nov 2016 #42
When the Democrats gave up New Deal and Great Society principles to the DLC and Blue Dogs, Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #44
so how do you explain Feingold loss ? JI7 Nov 2016 #48
I know ... they're still scratching their heads over that. But in time, NurseJackie Nov 2016 #50
Koch brother fucking. Scott Walker. Wisconsin people like getting fucked by Republicans. Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #52
and hillary had fbi, kgb, whore media attacking her JI7 Nov 2016 #70
what does that have to do with Wisconsin slitting its own throat with Walker and Johnson? Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #77
Same voters in the same election. Can't have it both ways n/t kcr Nov 2016 #72
WI had three opportunities to get ride of that fucker Walker and get rid of Johnson, who they don't Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #76
And that is the absolute truth malaise Nov 2016 #49
I think they enjoy losing. Cobalt Violet Nov 2016 #51
Look at my Buffalo Bills. There's the proof of a losing culture Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #54
you think Feingold wanted to lose ? JI7 Nov 2016 #78
Agree Kathy M Nov 2016 #93
Yes. LWolf Nov 2016 #58
That simple malaise Nov 2016 #59
No, it's bullshit, because lots of liberal and progressive candidates and issues have lost Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #81
Agree Kathy M Nov 2016 #91
Something's wrong with the world. gulliver Nov 2016 #63
Swimming against the tide is hard work BootinUp Nov 2016 #71
K&R n/t denbot Nov 2016 #73
I have had it with this language of going back, taking back BainsBane Nov 2016 #75
Democrats used to defend workers malaise Nov 2016 #80
Agree ..... Also Wanted to add avoiding wars Kathy M Nov 2016 #92
Something is wrong when supposed liberals vote for the fascist instead of the liberal. baldguy Nov 2016 #85
I think you are correct Horse with no Name Nov 2016 #95
we are all hurting demtenjeep Nov 2016 #96
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Something is wrong with t...»Reply #75