Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Bernie Sanders is going to be President, in two words [View all]darkangel218
(13,985 posts)21. See post 16.
He is referring to taxing the rich and going after Wall Street.
Nice try though.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
178 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Isn't posting material from rightwing internet sites some sort of DU violation?
George II
Oct 2015
#169
You attacked me without any credit for, earlier, saying I was calling you
darkangel218
Oct 2015
#102
Is it that hard to admit that the graphic is anti-Bernie and substitue a pro-Bernie one?
FSogol
Oct 2015
#104
Haven't I already responded to that 2 or 3 times? Why not delete your attacks on my gender?
FSogol
Oct 2015
#107
I've never attacked you, except you consider disagreeing with you to be an attack.
FSogol
Oct 2015
#113
I've always had a gender listed. You really don't read what people write. I'll explain it again:
FSogol
Oct 2015
#134
Yes....telling the electorate that you want to subsidize poverty is brilliant. nt
Cali_Democrat
Oct 2015
#47
"Trust Me - It's gonna be awesome" sounds like another candidate from the other side
Beaverhausen
Oct 2015
#50
That's all good but let's not post right-wing memes meant to slur those things.
Gore1FL
Oct 2015
#165
I agree the wording is sloppy. But you seem to want to discuss wording rather than the
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#18
You are using the sloppy wording to distract from the obvious message. A message that you obviously
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#48
The 'sloppy wording' comes from a Sanders-hater, if you'd care to look at the link upthread.
randome
Oct 2015
#80
Sanders does want to increase taxes on the rich and decrease taxes on the poor
darkangel218
Oct 2015
#30
They don't want to eliminate poverty at the expense of the wealthy. HRC will help maintain the
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#40
Raising the minumum wage is not taxing the rich, going after wall street, or subsidizing poverty.
NCTraveler
Oct 2015
#27
Finally, its is a Living Wage and Minumum Wage that Sanders is campaigning for not subsidy!
DhhD
Oct 2015
#147
Some people presume if your profile doesn't reflect a "proper attendance" that you're a nobody.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#143
I agree the language is sloppy but we know the intent. I understand the condescention.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#15
Trying to work around your attempts at distraction, I'm guessing you don't agree with taxing
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#37
Second time you have said I am distracting by saying Sanders wants to eliminate poverty.
NCTraveler
Oct 2015
#45
So you agree with Sen Sanders' desire to eliminate poverty by taxing the wealthy? nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#51
Let me guess your point. Since it bothers you that Sen Sanders wants to tax wealth to
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#24
Sen Sanders wants to eliminate poverty, while Goldman-Sachs and the billionaires don't give a crap.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#53
Subsidize poverty? I'm guessing this is a RW graphic intended to bash about Sanders and that
FSogol
Oct 2015
#43
She? It is strange a Sanders supporter would promote what is obviously a RW hit graphic on Sanders.
FSogol
Oct 2015
#74
Try this - post it in the Bernie Sanders Group and see how his real supporters feel about it
Beaverhausen
Oct 2015
#106
She and ma'am are both female terms. Since I am male, I asked to why you refereed to me as
FSogol
Oct 2015
#95
Good luck selling that to the majority of voters in the USA! Will never happen. Go Hillary!
beaglelover
Oct 2015
#115
Gosh, angel, even I don't cite the NRA, then play bull-in-the-ring with it. nt
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#138
He is awesome and nothing can change that, though they're trying really hard!
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#153
...because he pisses off right wing barglemonkeys with a basic knowledge of photoshop?
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2015
#159
I wonder if he will say he wants to "subsidize poverty" at the debate tonight?
zappaman
Oct 2015
#160