2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Bernie Sanders is going to be President, in two words [View all]Babel_17
(5,400 posts)But I'm going to wonder if it's OK to post such while presumably using extreme irony. Lines blur and the term "false flag" comes to mind. It's distracting, in other words.
That's my 2 cents, YMMV. As a graphic for deriding the Sanders campaign, it's OK of its sort and doesn't offend me. I suppose it's interesting to see what will be used against Senator Sanders as our nominee so I'm OK with seeing it at Democratic Underground.
But like I imply, the graphic is what it is and it's a bit disruptive to deny how it is used.
Cheers!
Edit: If that graphic was originally posted as being pro-Sanders, and not to mock his campaign, I was wrong in assuming otherwise, obviously. And following from that I would withdraw my issue with it here. Though even then it's controversial approach to sending its message should be recognized.