Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalLovinLug

(14,164 posts)
211. Yes I saw that.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 04:28 PM
Nov 2015

But if one understands what Authoritarianism is, there is a reason that the left wing authoritarian is reduced to a paragraph. Of course there are always individuals that do not fit the mold. But the general mold is the correlation between those with conservative beliefs and the authoritarian outlook.

BTW researchers replicated the study in 2014 to specifically examine this aspect and came to much the same conclusions.

http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/95405576/chasing-elusive-left-wing-authoritarian-examination-altemeyers-right-wing-authoritarianism-left-wing-authoritarianism-scales

Chasing the Elusive Left-Wing Authoritarian: An Examination of Altemeyer's Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Left-Wing Authoritarianism Scales

From the National Social Science Journal; 2014, Vol. 43 Issue 1

From the abstract:

The results largely replicated Altemeyer's (1996) research. The results showed no evidence of high scorers on the LWA Scale. Furthermore, the results confirmed Altemeyer's typology of authoritarian styles, demonstrating that right-wingers and wild-card authoritarians tend to score higher on measures of authoritarian aggression and lower on at least one measure of epistemic closure relative to non-authoritarians and left-wingers.


But seriously, you don't even need a study to come to the conclusion that Conservatives are obviously more authoritarian in their thinking. Many Conservatives would call themselves religious, both Christian and Muslim etc.. compared to the more secular left wing. Most Cons hold highly to strict Law and Order, and a patriarchal family unit. All of those institutions are clearly organized in a top-down authoritarian structure. Then again, I don't expect an actual Conservative to accept this research as the the authoritarian mindset blocks out or disputes any information that in any way chips away at the omnipotent world view they cling to.

She wants her cake and to eat it too. TM99 Nov 2015 #1
Unions need to WAKE UP. Segami Nov 2015 #6
And just who do you think REALLY pays the union heads? erronis Nov 2015 #44
You are correct.The local meetings are meaningless and in INdemo Nov 2015 #67
Unions are supporting Hillary, the are not part of the 1% lewebley3 Nov 2015 #169
Their leadership most certainly is TM99 Nov 2015 #173
Then Sanders leadership is corrupt too! lewebley3 Nov 2015 #194
Your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderberry. TM99 Nov 2015 #197
Typical Sanders person, Just a lot of nonsense: Your guy is losing lewebley3 Nov 2015 #198
EXACTLY !! kacekwl Nov 2015 #52
Exactly! acuity24 Nov 2015 #159
Yup, typical Hillary...afraid to take a principled stand. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2015 #163
she helped create it. she hates us. That's the last straw for me. roguevalley Nov 2015 #77
Well this prover She can't walk the walk! imthevicar Nov 2015 #135
Hillary should not take advise from Sanders supporters lewebley3 Nov 2015 #168
Why? TM99 Nov 2015 #171
I don't think Sanders people are better people: Just the opposite lewebley3 Nov 2015 #196
You must be fresh out of high school TM99 Nov 2015 #199
You talk like you in High school: All you got is calling Hillary names lewebley3 Nov 2015 #200
Odd, really, TM99 Nov 2015 #201
Your post was nothing but slander against Hillary lewebley3 Nov 2015 #202
Another sign that Hillary doesn't support American labor... Jester Messiah Nov 2015 #204
More nonesene: The Dem party is made up of mostly workers lewebley3 Nov 2015 #205
May I speak to a supervisor, please? [nt] Jester Messiah Nov 2015 #206
It's the gold standard of trade agreements. Cassiopeia Nov 2015 #2
Absolutely. tecelote Nov 2015 #19
After she locks up the nomination? Fast Walker 52 Nov 2015 #41
Locks it up or concedes, Cassiopeia Nov 2015 #92
I'm sure there will be "new information" she "discovers", to justify it though. nt 99th_Monkey Nov 2015 #121
Yep... BeanMusical Nov 2015 #136
Hillaryous Plucketeer Nov 2015 #83
Slip slidin' through the cracks. pangaia Nov 2015 #3
It's a slippery slope back into their pockets (or cracks....) erronis Nov 2015 #46
She wants to be "our" CHAMPION. stillwaiting Nov 2015 #4
Well I'm UglyGreed Nov 2015 #5
When has she ever led? virtualobserver Nov 2015 #7
And Netanyahoo's bestest buddy. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #59
Of course she won't Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #8
She's kinda busy Buzz cook Nov 2015 #9
Hasn't been- ruffburr Nov 2015 #10
She's determined to be the first President Aerows Nov 2015 #11
bazinga! sad but true. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #13
in other words, she supports it restorefreedom Nov 2015 #12
Why would she lobby against the "gold standard of trade"? Autumn Nov 2015 #14
The "gold standard of trade"... Paka Nov 2015 #97
She's so fucking dishonest. AzDar Nov 2015 #15
LOL! - "I'm Hillary Clinton, and I am a PROGRESSIVE who gets things done!" Segami Nov 2015 #16
Spot-on. AzDar Nov 2015 #18
The same as on every issue. 840high Nov 2015 #68
reminds me when she went to NASDAQ and told them to roguevalley Nov 2015 #78
I didn't recall that she said "Knock it off" so to be sure I searched the BeanMusical Nov 2015 #137
She's raised triangulation to a fine art... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #89
+1 Paka Nov 2015 #105
Well, why the hell not, then? MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #17
It's the Pander Bear! Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #147
She's big money, big corporation, big Bankster and Billionaire... SoapBox Nov 2015 #20
Wow! Where are the Hillary supporters defending her stance? tecelote Nov 2015 #21
Group meeting at the other site? bahrbearian Nov 2015 #23
I'm more and more convinced every day that they're nihilists. Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #38
The Authoritarian Personality. Erich Fromm said it all: rhett o rick Nov 2015 #126
yes, patronizing to the third letter.... hopemountain Nov 2015 #133
And that CACKLE laugh. My dislike of her grows daily. willvotesdem Nov 2015 #156
Posting a link to marxists.org, attacking Democrats ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #164
At least I posted a link to an article. You should read it, it won't hurt. rhett o rick Nov 2015 #166
You can still be a Marxist and a Democrat you know. blackspade Nov 2015 #175
I'm "red baiting" in the exact same way... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #182
Interesting that you would even make that kind of comparison. blackspade Nov 2015 #184
If you like your cognitive dissonance... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #185
LOL that was a yummy word salad. blackspade Nov 2015 #187
So when faced with incontrovertible proof... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #192
Another failed response from you. blackspade Nov 2015 #193
That's adorable... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #195
Snort. blackspade Nov 2015 #210
You're the little guy who can't argue merits ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #213
Now your getting pathetic with your childish insults. blackspade Nov 2015 #215
Its based on a research book called The Authoritarian Specter, by Bob Altemeyer LiberalLovinLug Nov 2015 #179
I read your links. Cobbled together gobbldygook... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #183
Yes I saw that. LiberalLovinLug Nov 2015 #211
Okay, so to summarize your thinking ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #214
Not really LiberalLovinLug Nov 2015 #216
Actually, I'm actually quite respectful of the adult lefties of the party. ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #218
The Democrats have a large tent LiberalLovinLug Nov 2015 #219
I wouldn't be on the DU if I weren't a Democrat ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #220
seriously? your money hungry ilk are destroying the democratic party hopemountain Nov 2015 #186
They're busy having a "Bernie doesn't get black people" day today. AlbertCat Nov 2015 #58
As memes go it is dead in the water. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #64
Ha! R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #63
We need a spy over there. They have lists. And they monitor the Bernie Sanders Group rhett o rick Nov 2015 #117
Eventually someone will spill the beans and show us interesting screenshots. BeanMusical Nov 2015 #142
Yes I agree. Those types of groups always implode. It usually turns out to be rhett o rick Nov 2015 #165
We go it handeled William769 Nov 2015 #217
"We offer different memberships to different people as many sites do." BeanMusical Nov 2015 #221
They are waiting on their talking points. wilsonbooks Nov 2015 #39
Please, please put them on ignore. nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #113
Hey, at least that's consistent with going to the NASDAQ and telling them to knock it off. SheilaT Nov 2015 #22
Hey, hey please be more accurate. She never said "knock it off". rhett o rick Nov 2015 #116
Hey now, please be accurate in your corrections! a2liberal Nov 2015 #144
I don't like to be corrected so, "cut it out". rhett o rick Nov 2015 #162
Will Sanders "lobby against TPP"? George II Nov 2015 #24
From his website Bryce Butler Nov 2015 #27
So who voted for TPP fast track in the Senate? (List) LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #28
He has already stated that he will. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #30
ah George arrives. :) roguevalley Nov 2015 #81
And your point is? George II Nov 2015 #99
Hi George! BeanMusical Nov 2015 #143
LOL! polly7 Nov 2015 #150
Lol, sorry! BeanMusical Nov 2015 #153
It's ok! polly7 Nov 2015 #154
I know what you mean. BeanMusical Nov 2015 #155
And water is wet. PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #25
.. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2015 #26
I wonder what the leader of the Democratic Party will do? yallerdawg Nov 2015 #29
Was anybody naive enough to think she would? Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #31
"I still don't know why she doesn't support it." SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #42
That reason doesn't count Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #74
Screw that. Android3.14 Nov 2015 #32
What does that mean? KansDem Nov 2015 #33
She’s intentionally talking out of both sides of her mouth dorkzilla Nov 2015 #62
She wants you to know she's against it hughee99 Nov 2015 #76
I'm fucking sick of these assholes... lame54 Nov 2015 #34
I agree with you in principal, but... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #93
Why should I vote for a candidate coyote Nov 2015 #127
watch last nights debate... lame54 Nov 2015 #160
Well I guess it´s all in what you want coyote Nov 2015 #188
I didn't expect her to. mmonk Nov 2015 #35
So since the TPP text is now available, please point me to the exact sections Persondem Nov 2015 #36
Show me one passage that actually has an enforcement mechanism with teeth to stop any GoneFishin Nov 2015 #40
Oh, I'm sure the corporate tribunals, SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #43
I know it. The one-sided language is a farce. But here's the kicker. Even though the GoneFishin Nov 2015 #49
Hey, can't have peons having their day in court, SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #54
Why not ask Hillary Clinton about the enforcement of tribunal decisions? DhhD Nov 2015 #181
Chapter 28, section 19 Persondem Nov 2015 #47
I know there is enforcement to help them screw us, I meant the humanitarian causes you cited. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #51
Look, I get that past trade deals have not been all that well done. But I do think Persondem Nov 2015 #56
I respect that you are trying to look at it fair handedly. That's great. But my opinion, which GoneFishin Nov 2015 #69
Ok, good find. I like that you actually read the thing. Persondem Nov 2015 #91
Is that really an enforcement mechanism? Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #98
That's beside the point. The "money" comes from American taxpayers and goes to corporations. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #103
Let me propose some TPP ideas Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #109
Why does any country enter into any trade agreement? If it is not going to follow the Persondem Nov 2015 #120
The best thing to do would be to not enter a bad trade agreement Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #124
So along with that nice bag of generalities not based on the actual document Persondem Nov 2015 #158
I don't want a way for artificial persons to make an end run around democatic governments Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #172
You need a lesson on rhetoric. "This section allows" Do you not see that "allows" is not binding? rhett o rick Nov 2015 #118
Allow can mean a lot of things. Could you give me the exact location or quote please? nt Persondem Nov 2015 #119
Here's a good article for a start: BeanMusical Nov 2015 #145
Whoever wrote that has not read TPP Persondem Nov 2015 #157
We are nameless, faceless little people up against her billionaire friends. Who is she going to side GoneFishin Nov 2015 #37
+1 darkangel218 Nov 2015 #45
We are but grist for the mill, while Hillary is driving the steamroller. Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #132
Well there are so many of us, and we whine incessantly about jobs, and food and stuff. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #139
Of course not. Just like she didn't speak out before Fast Track passed. Then after it passed PRESTO! think Nov 2015 #48
BINGO. SusanCalvin Nov 2015 #55
Slippery. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #140
NO mention silenttigersong Nov 2015 #50
So after taking months to conclude that she is against TPP d_legendary1 Nov 2015 #53
It is no surprise at all that she came out against the TPP once fast track was past davidpdx Nov 2015 #134
It's grade school level politics. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #141
No, it is a matter of whether a very bad trade deal passes or not davidpdx Nov 2015 #146
Agreed. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #167
Especially with all her congessional endorsements. GeorgeGist Nov 2015 #189
Hillary is a true leader for the 1%! R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #57
Empty Pantsuit n/t whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #60
I disagree. It's full of something alright. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #70
Haha whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #82
This message was self-deleted by its author GoneFishin Nov 2015 #106
LOL Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #151
She is called a leader by some here! sadoldgirl Nov 2015 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #65
I would like to know the answer, as well. Utterly baffling. AzDar Nov 2015 #72
That's quite a first post! ColesCountyDem Nov 2015 #75
You nailed it! Welcome to DU! tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #96
Welcome to DU! Paka Nov 2015 #110
This is like General Election already I mean INdemo Nov 2015 #66
Why should she, she isn't in the Congress or Senate. Historic NY Nov 2015 #71
Well, she is claiming to be a strong leader, and running for a leadership position. jeff47 Nov 2015 #112
Lots if endorsers in Congress ... GeorgeGist Nov 2015 #190
SO, no single-payer advocacy, silence on the TPP, extremely likely further warmongering, etc, etc stupidicus Nov 2015 #73
All excellent points. SmittynMo Nov 2015 #79
Wow Truprogressive85 Nov 2015 #80
Curious how they're going to spin this. Phlem Nov 2015 #84
How? Puglover Nov 2015 #88
Oh that's right, nothing of substance Phlem Nov 2015 #104
I wish I could remember the name of the talking Puglover Nov 2015 #85
This really ticks me off. Can you Hillary supporters not see the writing on the wall? She's a liar. YOHABLO Nov 2015 #86
I made this prediction earlier today floriduck Nov 2015 #87
This is probably the MAIN reason I'm supporting Bernie and not Clinton. PatrickforO Nov 2015 #90
Damned right Populist_Prole Nov 2015 #125
And she shouldn't. Let Bernie do it. That too will come back to haunt him. nt kelliekat44 Nov 2015 #94
Why does your profile show you as floriduck Nov 2015 #95
Its the system. I do support Bernie but I like Hillary more. nt kelliekat44 Nov 2015 #100
What would come back to haunt Bernie? Lobbying against the TPP? Dawgs Nov 2015 #212
What More Should One Expect From A Card Holding Member Of The 1% cantbeserious Nov 2015 #101
LOL !!! WillyT Nov 2015 #102
Who's side are you on, Hillary? azmom Nov 2015 #107
Not the side of the people. senz Nov 2015 #108
"Who's side are you on, Hillary?" BeanMusical Nov 2015 #148
America needs her to lobby against it, and see that oit is defeated. Faryn Balyncd Nov 2015 #111
Empty suit, except for all the corporate $$$$$. JEB Nov 2015 #114
Hillary and Wall Street Dems care more about India, China than USA. Seriously. They are bored whereisjustice Nov 2015 #115
OP makes excellent point EXCEPT... philly_bob Nov 2015 #122
She thinks people are stupid enough to not realize that her "position" is just for show jfern Nov 2015 #123
+1 Absolutely. BeanMusical Nov 2015 #149
K&R. Compare to Bernie who is opposed to the TPP and will do all he can to stop its passage. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #128
Clearly, now there is a difference between Bernie and Hillary that is real and substantial. Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #131
Anyway The Wind Blows Unknown Beatle Nov 2015 #129
... BeanMusical Nov 2015 #152
Colour me surprised (sarcasm). eom Betty Karlson Nov 2015 #130
Not to worry Fairgo Nov 2015 #138
Uh, let's see monicaangela Nov 2015 #161
Hillary Clinton, will you expand social security? retrowire Nov 2015 #170
Her prevaricating is painful to watch. blackspade Nov 2015 #174
Hillary's comment leaves open the bizarre possibility I hate liars Nov 2015 #176
This is painful PROOF.... bvar22 Nov 2015 #177
I don't trust a thing Faux pas Nov 2015 #178
Yep, jkbRN Nov 2015 #180
Good for her Freddie Stubbs Nov 2015 #191
Of course she won't; her backers wrote most of it! [nt] Jester Messiah Nov 2015 #203
She has "Never bite the hand that feeds you (or, pays you to entertain them)" down pat. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #207
She can't, she supports it. sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #208
She is still "evolving" on the issue EndElectoral Nov 2015 #209
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary WILL NOT Lobby Ag...»Reply #211