Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
15. Yeah, Glass-Steagall only worked great for 50 years.
Tue Dec 16, 2014, 08:05 PM
Dec 2014

Hillary is owned by Wall Street. And no, not all Democrats feel they must suck up to the Wall Street money trough to get elected.

Take, for example, this lady ...


Elizabeth Warren is fighting Wall Street for the soul of the Democratic Party



Bill Clinton changed the Democratic Party, and Elizabeth Warren is trying to change it back — at least when it comes to Wall Street.

The latest intra-party skirmish has come over the so-called "CRomnibus" (don't ask) spending bill that would have funded the government for the next year, as well as, among other pet projects, killed Dodd-Frank's prohibition on big banks using federally-insured money to make exotic bets. Now, that wouldn't gut financial reform by any means, but it would be the latest step in Wall Street's death-by-a-thousand-tweaks campaign against it. And that was too much for Warren, who led a liberal revolt against the bill that ultimately failed.

But what would this derivatives change even do? Well, swaps are just bets on everything from interest rates to currencies to whether a company is going to go under or not.

...The bigger issue is whether every legislative choke point will turn into another opportunity to whittle away at financial reform. That's why Warren and her allies have decided to draw a line in the sand here, over swaps push-outs. If they don't fight this battle, then they'll have to get ready for the next one over even more important parts of Dodd-Frank—and so on, and so on.

But this isn't a fight that all Democrats want. Some of them are happy to give Wall Street what it wants. That's been true ever since Clinton turned them into not the party of business, but a party of business—and particularly Wall Street business. The Warren wing of the Democratic Party, of course, wants to change this. That's why they oppose filling even lower-level Treasury positions with Wall Street veterans, and why they've rallied against a giveaway to big banks tucked away in the government funding bill.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/12/11/elizabeth-warren-is-fighting-wall-street-for-the-soul-of-the-democratic-party/
All criticisms of Bill must be placed in the context of the post Reagan BootinUp Dec 2014 #1
Hillary's policies, should she implement them, would be a huge give away to Wall Street. Scuba Dec 2014 #6
I disagree with you. and I am sure Wesley Clark does too. nt BootinUp Dec 2014 #7
Maybe, but Jamie and Lloyd know I'm right. Scuba Dec 2014 #8
They will support her when the time comes. nt BootinUp Dec 2014 #10
You think they give her all that dough 'cause they believe she'll restore Glass-Steagall? Scuba Dec 2014 #11
Scuba BootinUp Dec 2014 #12
Yeah, Glass-Steagall only worked great for 50 years. Scuba Dec 2014 #15
1. Hillary has said nothing on that BootinUp Dec 2014 #16
Hillary has principles? Who knew? Scuba Dec 2014 #17
She is definitely more progressive than Bill BootinUp Dec 2014 #18
Pro war, pro Wall Street, pro TPP, pro Keystone XL, pro H-1B visas, ... Scuba Dec 2014 #19
You distort facts maybe because you read crap. nt BootinUp Dec 2014 #20
How do you breath with your head buried in the sand? Scuba Dec 2014 #21
1.Keystone BootinUp Dec 2014 #22
OK, here ya go ... Scuba Dec 2014 #26
if she wants to disavow DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #28
There is no hurry, there is no advantage to her politically, and there is no reason BootinUp Dec 2014 #31
other than DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #32
What, 2 years from now? BootinUp Dec 2014 #34
With all due respect DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #37
Wait, she *used* to be more progressive than Bill, back in the 90s. beerandjesus Dec 2014 #25
I didn't think Al Gore was in office BootinUp Dec 2014 #30
Whether Al Gore is in office is immaterial to my analogy, Mr. Seriously. beerandjesus Dec 2014 #40
Pragmatism RiverLover Dec 2014 #47
I actually thought you were talking about Jamie BootinUp Dec 2014 #14
dont forget walmart elehhhhna Dec 2014 #23
What you are suggesting BootinUp Dec 2014 #33
stop. you're too silly to respond to further. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #35
I wish to record the fact that I was responding to other BootinUp Dec 2014 #36
FYI, "Elizabeth Warren's Next Target: Walmart" — Mother Jones RiverLover Dec 2014 #48
Clinton was elected to do away with Reagan's policies. I keep wondering sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #44
"Clinton believed in the policies he helped implement" BootinUp Dec 2014 #45
Did they? Many of them had no idea about what was really going on then. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #46
+1000000000! RiverLover Dec 2014 #49
Reminds me of ... Mika Dec 2014 #2
I'm sure Jamie and Lloyd love it. Scuba Dec 2014 #3
I saw her earlier and had to check twice to be sure it was not a parody. Mass Dec 2014 #4
Has she said where she stands on citigroups omnibus bill yet? Autumn Dec 2014 #5
She's quiet about it all.... KoKo Dec 2014 #43
Wait, nobody told me she was a daughter too! That changes everything! arcane1 Dec 2014 #9
Well color me surprised: It's LIP SYNCED!!~!! NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #13
What's interesting is that this was Played on Bloomberg Business News Politics, Today! KoKo Dec 2014 #27
Since Hillary does not have a pac the title should read PAC for Hillary. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #24
$ L0oniX Dec 2014 #29
Oh wow, that was bad. That was just awful. delrem Dec 2014 #38
You didn't like the guy's singing? Enthusiast Dec 2014 #42
Huh... Phlem Dec 2014 #39
"We’re needing a leader who’s tough and ready, whose got vision." Enthusiast Dec 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Hillary PAC has launched ...»Reply #15