Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
31. fwiw, here's my edit, flog away
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 02:17 AM
Feb 2015

Hillary, and her fellow Third-Way Democrats have run our Party for more than 20 years. During that time, things have certainly worked out well for the wealthiest Americans – heck, they’ve never done better – but clearly things haven't gone so well for everyone else.

Whether you believe that Democrats or Republicans have been responsible for the rich getting richer and everyone else having to work harder to scrape by, we cannot escape the fact that Hillary and her fellow Third Wayers have led our Party during this terrible time. Not only has the Third Way been ineffective at stopping Republicans, we believe they have actively contributed to our hardship by focusing exclusively on the wealthiest Americans. It's no surprise that the rest of us are falling behind.

Instead of continuing the same ideas and policies that have failed us, we must return to ideas and policies proven to work, for everyone. These are "road ready" ideas and policies that have created stability and wealth for Americans in the past and which continue to work in other countries where they’re followed today.

The richest Americans don't need more help from us. For the rest of America, a new future is needed to turn things around. Hillary and her branch of the Democratic Party represent a failed past.

==============================

Might be good to add some footnotes?

The latest data reinforce the larger story of America’s middle class household wealth stagnation over the past three decades. The Great Recession destroyed a significant amount of middle-income and lower-income families’ wealth, and the economic “recovery” has yet to be felt for them. Without any palpable increase in their wealth since 2010, middle- and lower-income families’ wealth levels in 2013 are comparable to where they were in the early 1990s.


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/business/the-typical-household-now-worth-a-third-less.html?_r=0

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/17/wealth-gap-upper-middle-income/

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/upshot/the-american-middle-class-is-no-longer-the-worlds-richest.html?abt=0002&abg=0


on edit - ok, maybe not so great. That'll teach me about top of my heading. But might stimulate some more ideas.
Simple and clear, therefore hard to misrepresent. Dragonfli Feb 2015 #1
Why define yourself by nothing more than what your hate? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #2
"we must return to ideas and policies that work" MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #3
Okay.n/t 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #6
You do lead with Hillary though, rather than with who "we" are. merrily Feb 2015 #40
Why label it as hate? We all love HRC, just think it would harm the 99% rhett o rick Feb 2015 #4
I didn't mention HRC ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #7
Well one of us thinks you are very clever. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #30
Opposition is not hate demwing Feb 2015 #8
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #11
glad you agree.../NT demwing Feb 2015 #14
Where is the hate? It isn't hate. It's wanting to win not just for the Democratic JDPriestly Feb 2015 #27
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #35
It's a decent start, but to edit is human .... Scuba Feb 2015 #5
All good points MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #9
You don't have to get bogged down on the home page. You can always link. merrily Feb 2015 #41
Time to bring back this post: "A Platform to Affirm Fundamental Human Rights" demwing Feb 2015 #10
Thank you for that. That thread should be pinned. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Cryptoad Feb 2015 #12
Can you be specific? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #13
Common Knowledge does not have to be cited.... Cryptoad Feb 2015 #18
Sorta like why we knew when we invaded Iraq MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #20
Yes it is and I said you could simply end what is self evident Dragonfli Feb 2015 #22
No need for personal attacks, heh? Cryptoad Feb 2015 #23
No I really do find you odd my observation was not meant as an attack Dragonfli Feb 2015 #24
lol Cryptoad Feb 2015 #25
Do you have anything you would like to contribute to making this a better country? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #33
Then stop. /nt Dragonfli Feb 2015 #21
I think you should feature.... PosterChild Feb 2015 #15
Agree, and definately should drop the FAQ, it is distracting/defensive whereisjustice Feb 2015 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Feb 2015 #16
Pin of the week demwing Feb 2015 #17
Just brainstorming here... PosterChild Feb 2015 #19
I'd put TPP as perhaps the single most important distinction between Democrats and their Party... whereisjustice Feb 2015 #26
tks. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #28
K&R. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #29
fwiw, here's my edit, flog away whereisjustice Feb 2015 #31
There's good stuff there. Thanks for taking the time and effort. Scuba Feb 2015 #34
Thanks for the post. I think we should have a pinned thread here that details the damage rhett o rick Feb 2015 #37
Excellent idea. Won't be hard to find the supporting evidence at this point. I'll try to dig up a whereisjustice Feb 2015 #39
"Hard choices have to be made to bring back opportunity for all Americans. We need somebody other whereisjustice Feb 2015 #38
Great opening salvo Manny. merrily Feb 2015 #42
Since 2002, no Dem who voted Yes on the Iraq War has won the presidency Dems to Win Feb 2015 #43
All I can say is... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #44
Nice start on the site. antiquie Mar 2015 #45
A different slant semanticwikiian Mar 2015 #46
another graphical device semanticwikiian Mar 2015 #48
i like the faq - it's a critical CONTEXT statement for the site semanticwikiian Mar 2015 #47
The only nit I would pick with this is the double mention of HRC. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»ReadyForSomeoneElse.org, ...»Reply #31