Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

kacekwl

(7,010 posts)

22. K&R

Reply to rhett o rick (Original post)

Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:05 PM

Mar 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Time for Change [View all] rhett o rick Mar 2015 OP

k&r whereisjustice Mar 2015 #1

People are fearful, not hopeful. They'll accept a Clinton for fear of a Bush. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #2

That is where I'm at. I'll fight with everything I have against hrc until she's Doctor_J Mar 2015 #3

If it helps, Doctor_J, just remind yourself that you're voting for a Supreme Court picker. calimary Mar 2015 #11

Amen..... daleanime Mar 2015 #21

Then those that we oppose have already won. They don't have to do anything different TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #42

While the fear of Bush might explain some of it, it's also the fear of change. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #6

+100 appalachiablue Mar 2015 #12

Fear of Change Martin Eden Mar 2015 #16

Fear works for the repubs, not for the dems n2doc Mar 2015 #9

We would have been better off rephrasing that fear of a R majority to hope that a Democratic jwirr Mar 2015 #18

And someone who won't get anthraxed. nt valerief Mar 2015 #4

Or whose car won't accidently run into a tree at high speed. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #7

pretending to be morally pure. stonecutter357 Mar 2015 #5

Who is "pretending to be morally pure."? and how does that relate to the OP? nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #10

I think it is like Hodur saying nothing but "Hodur" That gibberish Dragonfli Mar 2015 #35

Means not being an amoral unprincipled fuck lacking all consistency as far as I can tell. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #43

How do we galvanize the people so they vote that way? treestar Mar 2015 #8

I disagree that most people are satisfied with their lot. I don't know what circles you rhett o rick Mar 2015 #13

You know these people treestar Mar 2015 #25

I miss Time for Change. OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #14

I agree. I didn't notice that my subject was the name of a previous DU'er until after I posted. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #15

He said he will be posting sometime soon. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #44

Huzzah! OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #45

Agree 100%. Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2015 #17

We do need another FDR but right now I would be happy with an Eisenhower. n/t A Simple Game Mar 2015 #24

THIS is the absolutely best thread I have seen in a long long time. Thank everyone who has posted. jwirr Mar 2015 #19

I'll jump on the band wagon as soon as an "electable" change candidate announces. Fla Dem Mar 2015 #20

K&R kacekwl Mar 2015 #22

We May Need More Options colsohlibgal Mar 2015 #23

Hmmm ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #26

Let me try to guess your point. Since most of us get paid from some corporation rhett o rick Mar 2015 #27

It seems to me you are trying to find something in my post to be OUTRAGED about. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #29

Quite the contrary. Seems to me you were trying to rationalize that bribery rhett o rick Mar 2015 #30

Only in your head ... Only in your head ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #31

Apparently I failed to grasp what you were trying to insinuate. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #32

Yes ... You did. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #33

There are still government employees aspirant Mar 2015 #28

Don't forget the unemployed. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #34

Elizabeth Warren has the buzz, the zeitgeist, the energy Dems to Win Mar 2015 #36

I think the risk is high for her. The Democratic Party Machine will back H. Clinton. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #37

Agreed. I won't blame Liz, I'll blame the Dem leadership Dems to Win Mar 2015 #40

K&R through the roof marym625 Mar 2015 #38

Time Has Come Today Alkene Mar 2015 #39

Yes, we need someone who is independent of the powers who currently run our country Time for change Mar 2015 #41