Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
18. "just let these who want to participate be able to voice an opinion" easier said than done.
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 01:12 AM
Mar 2015

We could include make hosting more transparent and include input from more members if we posted an open discussion thread, but this would be a bit rude and could even be alerted on and result in a hide.

One GD host recently had a locking statement hidden by a jury, unbelievable: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026184309#post1

So it's really easier to simply trust the hosts. I don't have a problem with an open discussion or a PM discussion about how things are done but the guidelines are pretty clear.

This is a place to discuss ways to move the party in a progressive direction, not to defend the status quo.

The primaries are going to be interesting depending upon who openly declares and is running.

We're sticking to reform, and that might draw some disruptive behavior, and that behavior might lead to blocking.

You want transparency, this thread is a demonstration that the host want it to.

Some Thoughts About Trolls [View all] demwing Mar 2015 OP
I see 2 blocked DU'ers now, aspirant Mar 2015 #1
If there was 1 and now there is 2, then someone was blocked, not unblocked? djean111 Mar 2015 #2
No aspirant Mar 2015 #3
SOP: Users are first given a 30 day time out demwing Mar 2015 #4
Where are these SOPS written, aspirant Mar 2015 #5
The procedures are shared between the hosts demwing Mar 2015 #6
Demwing, aspirant Mar 2015 #7
The SOPS are the operating procedures for the Hosts demwing Mar 2015 #11
SOPS aspirant Mar 2015 #15
This "SOP" confusion is my fault demwing Mar 2015 #16
Group Statements of Purpose can not be edited once they are created. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #17
PRG Policy aspirant Mar 2015 #19
A: Blocking policies are not "communicated". B: This is not the BOG. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #21
Living Populism aspirant Mar 2015 #29
If you don't think it's happening (people behaving), what have you done to help create change? demwing Mar 2015 #24
"what have you done" aspirant Mar 2015 #27
I welcome your posts demwing Mar 2015 #31
"just let these who want to participate be able to voice an opinion" easier said than done. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #18
PRG Policies aspirant Mar 2015 #20
Where do you find this information? Enthusiast Mar 2015 #25
Go to PRG site aspirant Mar 2015 #26
Seems clear enough pscot Mar 2015 #8
Asking for transparency aspirant Mar 2015 #9
The host super powers pscot Mar 2015 #12
Contravening? aspirant Mar 2015 #13
As I see it, disagreements over policies or issues are ok as long as it doesn't rhett o rick Mar 2015 #10
My concerns are POPULIST policies and principles, aspirant Mar 2015 #14
Thank you, demwing, for creating this group! NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #22
Thank you, NYC_SKP, for all your help! /nt demwing Mar 2015 #23
Must purge them HassleCat Mar 2015 #28
Welcome to DU. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #30
Welcome to Democratic Underground rbrnmw Mar 2015 #32
Keep in mind we have our share of trolls here too GP6971 Mar 2015 #33
Here, here! Fairgo Mar 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Some Thoughts About Troll...»Reply #18