Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. I never saw anything like this in my life either.
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 10:11 AM
Apr 2015

Yet they keep trying to convince us that it happened spontaneously and organically and is totally consistent with the Party's modern history.



In a way, I am glad I saw the quotes from Schumer, Frank and Brown that I saw. In a way, I am horrified. Let me explain.

I had been posting for a year that it looked as though we were not going to have a real primary, maybe none, maybe a dog and pony show.

From a few of the usual suspects who post like they know the inner workings of the Party (and all said workings are, of course, wonderful and/or necessary), came assertions that we were going to have a primary and a real one, too. Obviously, I yawned.

Then, I found and posted the Schumer quote about no primary challengers to Hillary, please. Of course, I had already seen a lot of posts here about Lamont/Lieberman, Lincoln/whatever her challenger's name was, Sestak/Spector, etc. So, people were seeing the facts on the ground about the Senate without needing any direct quotes from real Party insiders.

After posting that link, though, of course, I got another denial. It was "only" Schumer." (LMAO. Shortly after that, he became Senate Party Leader. What would he know?) I replied no matter how many quotes I posted, his reply would be the same.

Then I found Brown and Frank, too. So, I posted all three. Sure enough, since when are Schumer, Frank and Brown the Democratic Party? At that point, I could barely contain my laughter.

So, at first, I was glad to have found the quotes. BUT, obviously, the Party does not mind this info coming out in dribs and drabs, here and there, from highly placed Dems in the know. That makes me worry that they may be gradually making it the "new normal," convincing us bit by bit to abhor primaries because they supposedly are bad for the Party.

From the bizarre posts I've seen here, I would not be the least bit surprised if "the swarm" posted about that like they do about every other party policy:

"We've always been at war with Eastasia."

"I love Big Brother."

So, stay tuned.

You should post ALL THE TIME! marym625 Apr 2015 #1
THANKS, merrily Apr 2015 #4
I don't host but I will be happy if you do. marym625 Apr 2015 #5
I know, right? I've never been tempted to do a GBCW post, but I have merrily Apr 2015 #7
I completely understand marym625 Apr 2015 #8
I've been telling myself to cut back or stop as well. RiverLover Apr 2015 #23
Please don't stop or cut back. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #28
I whomeheartly agree. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #2
voted write in for myself in a primary once. willing to do it again if you think it will help lol nt msongs Apr 2015 #3
I appreciate that msongs and your idea has great possiblities. merrily Apr 2015 #6
Me too marym625 Apr 2015 #10
This has promise as a movement for the 99%! merrily Apr 2015 #12
Love it! marym625 Apr 2015 #24
msongs was talking about a write in for the primary. merrily Apr 2015 #25
I think, if he doesn't run, a grassroots campaign to write him in marym625 Apr 2015 #26
I never saw anything like this in my life either. merrily Apr 2015 #29
Did you post the Schumer Democracy Now interview? marym625 Apr 2015 #39
I don't know if it's meant anything for a long time. merrily Apr 2015 #38
+1000 marym625 Apr 2015 #40
Please... what is DSCC? mylye2222 Apr 2015 #9
No worries. You can't even know from googling DSCC merrily Apr 2015 #11
So tgis "skip primaries" was from 2005. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #13
Mmm. careful. Remember schumer is a politican. He knows how to say things. merrily Apr 2015 #14
In this OP check DUer Karynnjs post not far from OP below in responses. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #15
Can we please not bring anything about Kerry here? I know you and karennj are great fans of his, merrily Apr 2015 #16
OK I understand. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #17
It's not my having an issue with Kerry. It's exactly what I said in Reply 16. merrily Apr 2015 #18
I know merrily. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #20
I wholeheartedly agree on the Party machine mylye2222 Apr 2015 #19
A reform is definitely needed mylye2222 Apr 2015 #21
Thing is, they reform themselves toward less and less say by us. merrily Apr 2015 #22
Wouldn't writing in require a hand count aspirant Apr 2015 #36
Dunno. Boston uses paper ballots and allows write ins, though a machine somehow reads? merrily Apr 2015 #37
The point is to move the Democratic Party and the GOP both to the Right. leveymg Apr 2015 #27
Yes. That's why the Koch brothers funded both the DLC and the Tea Party. merrily Apr 2015 #31
+1 AND, Schumer will ascend with Reid's blessings! Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #33
The Ohio party has for some time frozen out most of us. riqster Apr 2015 #30
Glad things are loosening up. Make noise! I wish you well in getting merrily Apr 2015 #32
Nope. The party does as it pleases. riqster Apr 2015 #34
Guess it's still 1880. Too bad. merrily Apr 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Does the Party discourage...»Reply #29